We started by rolling our own a bunch of years back (in Lotus Notes...), then we switched to Bugzilla, then to Mantis, and finally to Jira. Of the bunch of them, I am actually fondest of Jira for it's all around usability. Atlassian's other products come in handy as your needs grow.
In case you are interested, we dropped Bugzilla because of it's UI. We left Mantis due to some internal politics surrounding open source software. And, it appears that we have settled on Jira. Overall, I'm quite happy with the choice.
But if you are looking for simple, take a look at Mantis. It's PHP over "pick your DB". If you spend a little time getting used to the code base and how to customize it, it is actually quite nice.
Roundup is a Python based generic "tracker". You can use it for bugs, but also a lot more (or less!). It is very simple to use, and setup. Also has a robust email interface.
three registered users with full access and unlimited anonymous visitors
your own deployment of a fully functional version of JIRA (Enterprise, Professional or Standard — compare editions)
perpetual use
The free Personal JIRA license comes with a few restrictions:
JIRA Personal license holders are not entitled to Atlassian support.
all JIRA Personal licenses are solely permitted for personal environments.
only one JIRA Personal License is allotted per person.
JIRA is by far the best bug tracking system I have ever used. I have used FogBugz at a previous workplace, and IMO was not as feature rich or as powerful as JIRA.
Of the two commercial ones, FogBugz on the face of it is more expensive but there are several compelling advantages over Jira:
option to have a hosted version (but at $25+ a seat per month, it doesn't come cheap);
it includes the emailing component;
it has a wiki (you would need Confluence - another commercial product - or some other Wiki with Jira that won't be as nicely integrated);
it has project management features, namely evidence based scheduling. I've yet to see this used in a large project but it certainly would be interesting as it seems more flexible (and realistic) than the classic GANTT Chart approach;
easily ability to upload screenshots (very useful for testers);
opening a new case is as easy as sending an email bug request (and you don't need a license to do this but you do if you want to track it, be assigned it and so on);
source control integration; and
hosted version is free for up to 2 users.
One comment I'll make is that I find the hosted version of FogBugz to be a bit... slow. It feels unresponsive. I've only ever used that version so I don't know how the local version compares but to me Jira seemed more responsive.
Bugzilla I know less about but it seems more narrowly focused on just tracking bugs whereas the other two have integrated a much broader range of features.
There are of course other bug tracking tools not listed above but I know less about those.
At the time I write this, Axosoft has OnTime Express available for a team of 5 developers for $5. Normally, it's $395 for 5 users. Not a typo. I've always like OnTime for it's simplicity and yet full-featured capability. And I'm not a shill (I'm not reimbursed in any way for this opinion).
发布评论
评论（9）
我们首先在几年前推出了自己的版本（在 Lotus Notes 中......），然后我们切换到 Bugzilla，然后到 Mantis，最后到 Jira. 在这群人中，我实际上最喜欢 Jira，因为它的可用性很强。 随着您的需求增长，Atlassian 的其他产品会派上用场。
如果您感兴趣，我们放弃了 Bugzilla，因为它的 UI。 由于一些围绕开源软件的内部政治，我们离开了 Mantis。 而且，看来我们已经选择了 Jira。 总的来说，我对这个选择非常满意。
但如果你正在寻找简单的东西，可以看看Mantis。 这是 PHP 而不是“选择你的数据库”。 如果您花一点时间来习惯代码库以及如何自定义它，它实际上非常好。
We started by rolling our own a bunch of years back (in Lotus Notes...), then we switched to Bugzilla, then to Mantis, and finally to Jira. Of the bunch of them, I am actually fondest of Jira for it's all around usability. Atlassian's other products come in handy as your needs grow.
In case you are interested, we dropped Bugzilla because of it's UI. We left Mantis due to some internal politics surrounding open source software. And, it appears that we have settled on Jira. Overall, I'm quite happy with the choice.
But if you are looking for simple, take a look at Mantis. It's PHP over "pick your DB". If you spend a little time getting used to the code base and how to customize it, it is actually quite nice.
已经问过好几次了。 请参阅以下帖子：
您使用什么错误跟踪软件？
< a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62153/reasons-not-to-build-your-own-bug-tracking-system">不构建自己的错误跟踪系统的原因
哪些问题跟踪器支持子门票，以及它们在弥合项目经理和开发人员之间的差距方面效果如何？
Asked several times times already. See these SO posts:
What bug tracking software do you use?
Reasons not to build your own bug tracking system
Which issue trackers support sub-tickets, and how well do they work for bridging the gap between project managers and developers?
Roundup 是一个基于 Python 的通用“跟踪器”。 您可以将其用于错误，但也可以使用更多（或更少！）。 它的使用和设置非常简单。 还有一个强大的电子邮件界面。
Roundup is a Python based generic "tracker". You can use it for bugs, but also a lot more (or less!). It is very simple to use, and setup. Also has a robust email interface.
查看使用个人许可证的JIRA，这应该可以让您轻松进入价格范围- 事实上免费。
然而，该许可证确实有限制。
JIRA 是迄今为止我用过的最好的错误跟踪系统。 我在以前的工作场所使用过 FogBugz，IMO 的功能不如 JIRA 丰富或强大。
Look at JIRA using a Personal License which should bring you well into the price range - Free in fact.
However this license does have limitations.
JIRA is by far the best bug tracking system I have ever used. I have used FogBugz at a previous workplace, and IMO was not as feature rich or as powerful as JIRA.
查看 FogBugz （托管或非托管）。 2-3 个用户免费托管。
如需免费替代方案，请尝试 Bugzilla。
当然还有 Jira。
在这两个商业版本中，FogBugz 表面上更贵，但与 Jira 相比有几个引人注目的优势：
我要发表的一个评论是，我发现 FogBugz 的托管版本有点……慢。 感觉没反应。 我只使用过该版本，所以我不知道本地版本相比如何，但对我来说，Jira 似乎反应更快。
Jira 的优点是（恕我直言）：
我对 Bugzilla 了解较少，但它似乎更专注于跟踪错误，而其他两个则集成了更广泛的功能。
当然还有上面没有列出的其他错误跟踪工具，但我对这些了解较少。
Check out FogBugz (hosted or not). Hosted it's free for 2-3 users.
For a free alternative, try Bugzilla.
And of course there is Jira.
Of the two commercial ones, FogBugz on the face of it is more expensive but there are several compelling advantages over Jira:
One comment I'll make is that I find the hosted version of FogBugz to be a bit... slow. It feels unresponsive. I've only ever used that version so I don't know how the local version compares but to me Jira seemed more responsive.
The advantages of Jira are (imho):
Bugzilla I know less about but it seems more narrowly focused on just tracking bugs whereas the other two have integrated a much broader range of features.
There are of course other bug tracking tools not listed above but I know less about those.
我已经使用了 trac 和 Mantis 在实际项目上，并且可以推荐两者。
它们都可能包含您不需要的功能，但这些并没有什么坏处。
trac 尤其具有相当干净的用户界面，这可能是一个问题。
它确实有一个内置的 wiki，但您不必使用它:-)。
I have used both trac and Mantis on real projects, and can recommend both.
They both may contain features you don't need,but these don't hurt.
trac in particularly has a fairly clean UI, which might be a concern.
It does have a wiki built-in, but you don't have to use it :-).
JIRA 似乎非常适合跟踪错误。 它也有一些项目管理的副作用。
JIRA seems pretty good for tracking bugs. It has some project management side effects as well.
在我撰写本文时，Axosoft 已为 5 名开发人员团队提供 OnTime Express，价格为 5 美元。 通常，5 个用户的价格为 395 美元。 不是错字。 我一直喜欢 OnTime，因为它简单且功能齐全。 而且我不是托儿（我不会因为这个意见而得到任何补偿）。
At the time I write this, Axosoft has OnTime Express available for a team of 5 developers for $5. Normally, it's $395 for 5 users. Not a typo. I've always like OnTime for it's simplicity and yet full-featured capability. And I'm not a shill (I'm not reimbursed in any way for this opinion).
BugHost 很好，基本而且免费。
BugHost is good, basic and free.