“Exchange Legacy Distinguished Name”和“Exchange Legacy Distinguished Name”之间有什么区别？ 和“Active Directory 专有名称”？
我对这两个术语有点困惑：“传统专有名称”（传统 DN）和“专有名称”(DN)。
第一个术语旧版 DN 似乎仅适用于 Exchange，而后一个DN 仅针对 Active Directory 提及。
它们的格式显然不同：
DN 类似于：CN=Morgan Cheng, OU= SomeOrg, DC=SomeCom, DC=com
LegacyDN 类似于：/o=SomeDomain/ou=SomeGroup /cn=Recipients/cn=Morgan Cheng
我还是不清楚到底有什么区别。 他们是两个完全不同的东西吗？ 或者只是以两种不同形式表示的相同信息？
而且，为什么它被称为“遗产”？ 既然是遗产，那一定是新的，对吧？
希望AD和Exchang的专家能给我一些意见。
I'm a little confused by these two terms: "Legacy Distinguished Name"(Legacy DN) and "Distingushed Name"(DN).
The first term Legacy DN seems only for Exchange, while the latter DN is only mentioned for Active Directory.
They are obviously not in same format:
DN is like: CN=Morgan Cheng, OU= SomeOrg, DC=SomeCom, DC=com
LegacyDN is like: /o=SomeDomain/ou=SomeGroup/cn=Recipients/cn=Morgan Cheng
I am still not clear what exactly the differce is. Are they two totally differnt stuff? or just same info represented in two different forms?
And, why is it called "Legacy"? If it is legacy, something must be new, right?
Hope some AD and Exchang experts can give me some inputs.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
在 Exchange 5.5 中，Exchange 为帐户和邮箱分配可分辨名称 (Obj-Dist-Name)。 当 Active Directory 出现时，Exchange 2000 及更高版本将使用其可分辨名称。 为了保持向后兼容性，从 Exchange 5.5 迁移到 Exchange 2000 将旧 DN 转移到 ActiveDirectory 的 LegacyExchangeDN 属性中。
某些应用程序继续引用 Obj-Dist-Name。 为了保持与这些应用程序的兼容性，即使对于尚未从 Exchange 5.5 迁移的对象，更高版本的 Exchange 也会合成一个 LegacyExchangeDN 值。 RUS 会自动将其设置为某个值，显然与您的情况中的 DistinguishedName 的值相同。
“新”方式（自 2000 年以来）是通过专有名称而不是 Obj-Dist-Name 来引用对象。
In Exchange 5.5, Exchange was assigning distinguished names to accounts and mailboxes (Obj-Dist-Name). When Active Directory came along, Exchange 2000 and later would use its distinguished names instead. In order to preserve backwards compatibility, migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 carried over the old DNs into the legacyExchangeDN attribute of ActiveDirectory.
Some applications continue to refer to Obj-Dist-Name. To preserve compatibility with these applications, later exchange versions synthesize a legacyExchangeDN value even for objects that have not been migrated from Exchange 5.5. The RUS automatically sets it to some value, apparently to the same value as the distinguishedName in your case.
The "new" way (since 2000) is to refer to objects by distinguished name, not Obj-Dist-Name.