从帧率代码中得到奇怪的结果

发布于 2024-07-17 14:03:42 字数 1320 浏览 4 评论 0原文

我试图将游戏保持在 60 fps,但我从代码中得到奇怪的结果,例如“2-8000 fps”,为什么这不保持在 60?

public static void main(String[] args) {

        joglplat m = new joglplat();
        while(true){
            long startTime = System.nanoTime() / 1000000;
                try
            {
                //                 123456: 6 zeros => 16ms
                long nsToSleep = 16000000 - (System.nanoTime() - lastFrame);
                System.out.println("ns: " + nsToSleep);
                lastFrame = System.nanoTime();

                if(nsToSleep > 0)
                {
                   System.out.println("ns2: " + (nsToSleep/1000));
                   System.out.println("ns3: " + (nsToSleep%1000));
                   Thread.sleep(nsToSleep/16000000, (int)(nsToSleep % 1000));
                }
                else
                {
                   Thread.yield();  // Only necessary if you want to guarantee that
                                    // the thread yields the CPU between every frame
                }

            }

            catch(Exception e){
                e.printStackTrace();
            }

            m.controls();
            m.update();
            m.repaint();
            System.out.println("framerate: " + (System.nanoTime() / 1000000  - startTime));
        }
    }

I'm trying to keep my game at 60fps, but I'm getting strange results from my code like "2-8000 fps" Why isn't this staying at 60?

public static void main(String[] args) {

        joglplat m = new joglplat();
        while(true){
            long startTime = System.nanoTime() / 1000000;
                try
            {
                //                 123456: 6 zeros => 16ms
                long nsToSleep = 16000000 - (System.nanoTime() - lastFrame);
                System.out.println("ns: " + nsToSleep);
                lastFrame = System.nanoTime();

                if(nsToSleep > 0)
                {
                   System.out.println("ns2: " + (nsToSleep/1000));
                   System.out.println("ns3: " + (nsToSleep%1000));
                   Thread.sleep(nsToSleep/16000000, (int)(nsToSleep % 1000));
                }
                else
                {
                   Thread.yield();  // Only necessary if you want to guarantee that
                                    // the thread yields the CPU between every frame
                }

            }

            catch(Exception e){
                e.printStackTrace();
            }

            m.controls();
            m.update();
            m.repaint();
            System.out.println("framerate: " + (System.nanoTime() / 1000000  - startTime));
        }
    }

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

谁的新欢旧爱 2024-07-24 14:03:42

您的输出是程序运行的秒数,而不是帧速率。 您应该将帧数(您没有收集的帧数)除以总运行时间。

要获取帧计数,只需在游戏循环之外添加一个新变量,并每次通过...递增它......

public static void main(String[] args) {
    long frames = 0;
    joglplat m = new joglplat();
    while(true){
        frames++;
        // other code here
        System.out.println("framerate: " + ((System.nanoTime() / 1000000  - startTime) / frames ) );
    }
}

但是请注意,这将为您提供程序整个执行过程中的平均帧速率。 另外两个选项是获取瞬时帧速率和过去 N 帧的平均帧速率。

所有样式合而为一(未经测试/未编译,因此可能会有一些错误,但应该让您朝着正确的方向开始):

public static void main(String[] args) {
    long startTime = System.nanoTime();
    long lastFrameTime = startTime;
    long frames = 0;
    int framesToAverage = 10;
    long[] frameTimes = new long[framesToAverage];
    joglplat m = new joglplat();
    while(true){
        // logic here
        long currentFrameDuration = System.nanoTime() - lastFrame;
        lastFrameTime = System.nanoTime();
        long instantFramerate = currentFrameDuration / 1000000;
        int currentFrameIndex = frames % frameTimes.length;
        frameTimes[currentFrameIndex] = currentFrameDuration;
        frames++;
        long averageFramerate = ( ( lastFrameTime - startTime) / frames ) / 1000000;
        long instantFramerate = currentFrameDuration / 1000000;
        if( frames > frameTimes.length ) { // if it isn't, we don't have enough data yet
            int firstFrameIndex = currentFrameIndex + 1;
            if( firstFrameIndex > frameTimes.length ) {
                firstFrameIndex = 0;
            }
            long averageFrameratePerN = ( ( frameTimes[currentFrameIndex] - frameTimes[firstFrameindex] ) / frameTimes.length ) / 1000000;
        }

        // yield/sleep here
    }
}

Your output is the number of seconds your program has run for, not framerate. You should be dividing your frame count (which you aren't collecting) by the total time run.

To get the frame count, simply add a new variable outside of your game loop, and increment it each time through...

public static void main(String[] args) {
    long frames = 0;
    joglplat m = new joglplat();
    while(true){
        frames++;
        // other code here
        System.out.println("framerate: " + ((System.nanoTime() / 1000000  - startTime) / frames ) );
    }
}

Note, however, that this will give you the average framerate throughout the entire execution of your program. Two other options you have are to get the instantaneous framerate, and the average framerate over the past N frames.

All styles in one (untested/uncompiled, so might have some errors, but should get you started in the right direction):

public static void main(String[] args) {
    long startTime = System.nanoTime();
    long lastFrameTime = startTime;
    long frames = 0;
    int framesToAverage = 10;
    long[] frameTimes = new long[framesToAverage];
    joglplat m = new joglplat();
    while(true){
        // logic here
        long currentFrameDuration = System.nanoTime() - lastFrame;
        lastFrameTime = System.nanoTime();
        long instantFramerate = currentFrameDuration / 1000000;
        int currentFrameIndex = frames % frameTimes.length;
        frameTimes[currentFrameIndex] = currentFrameDuration;
        frames++;
        long averageFramerate = ( ( lastFrameTime - startTime) / frames ) / 1000000;
        long instantFramerate = currentFrameDuration / 1000000;
        if( frames > frameTimes.length ) { // if it isn't, we don't have enough data yet
            int firstFrameIndex = currentFrameIndex + 1;
            if( firstFrameIndex > frameTimes.length ) {
                firstFrameIndex = 0;
            }
            long averageFrameratePerN = ( ( frameTimes[currentFrameIndex] - frameTimes[firstFrameindex] ) / frameTimes.length ) / 1000000;
        }

        // yield/sleep here
    }
}
情独悲 2024-07-24 14:03:42

我怀疑这是由 Thread.sleep() 不准确引起的:

导致当前正在执行的线程
睡眠(停止执行)
指定的毫秒数加上
指定的纳秒数,
须符合精度和准确度
系统定时器和调度程序。 这
线程不会失去任何的所有权
监视器。

有什么理由必须像这样降低帧速率吗? 也许您可以更全面地解释您想要实现的目标?

My suspicion is that this is caused by the inaccuracy of Thread.sleep():

Causes the currently executing thread
to sleep (cease execution) for the
specified number of milliseconds plus
the specified number of nanoseconds,
subject to the precision and accuracy
of system timers and schedulers. The
thread does not lose ownership of any
monitors.

Is there any reason why you have to hold the framerate down like this? Perhaps you can explain more fully what you are trying to accomplish?

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文