如何从字母矩阵中查找可能的单词列表 [Boggle Solver]

Question

最近我在 iPhone 上玩一款名为 Scramble 的游戏。 你们中有些人可能知道这个游戏叫 Boggle。 本质上，当游戏开始时，你会得到一个字母矩阵，如下所示：

F X I E
A M L O
E W B X
A S T U

游戏的目标是找到尽可能多的可以通过将字母链接在一起形成的单词。 你可以从任何字母开始，它周围的所有字母都是公平的游戏，然后一旦你移动到下一个字母，该字母周围的所有字母都是公平的游戏，除了任何以前使用过的字母< /强>。 例如，在上面的网格中，我可以想出单词 LOB、TUX、SEA、FAME > 等。单词必须至少为 3 个字符，且不超过 NxN 个字符，在本游戏中为 16 个字符，但在某些实现中可能会有所不同。 虽然这个游戏很有趣并且令人上瘾，但我显然不太擅长它，我想通过制作一个程序来稍微作弊，它可以给我最好的单词（单词越长，你得到的分数越多）。

_{（来源：boggled.org）}

不幸的是，我不是很擅长算法或其效率等。 我的第一次尝试使用字典 例如这个 (~2.3MB)，并进行线性搜索，尝试将组合与字典条目进行匹配。 这需要非常很长的时间来找到可能的单词，而且由于每轮只有 2 分钟的时间，所以这根本不够。

我很想看看 Stackoverflowers 是否能提出更有效的解决方案。 我主要寻找使用三大 P 的解决方案：Python、PHP 和 Perl，尽管任何使用 Java 或 C++ 的解决方案也很酷，因为速度至关重要。

当前解决方案：

• Adam Rosenfield，Python，~20s
• John Fouhy，Python，~3s
• Kent Fredric，Perl，~1s
• Darius Bacon，Python，~1s
• rvarcher，VB.NET，~1s
• Paolo Bergantino，PHP （实时链接），~5s（本地~2s）

Answer 1

我的答案和这里的其他答案一样，但我会发布它，因为它看起来比其他 Python 解决方案快一点，因为设置字典更快。 （我对照 John Fouhy 的解决方案检查了这一点。）设置完成后，解决问题的时间就被淹没了。

grid = "fxie amlo ewbx astu".split()
nrows, ncols = len(grid), len(grid[0])

# A dictionary word that could be a solution must use only the grid's
# letters and have length >= 3. (With a case-insensitive match.)
import re
alphabet = ''.join(set(''.join(grid)))
bogglable = re.compile('[' + alphabet + ']{3,}
  用法示例：
# Print a maximal-length word and its path:
print max(solve(), key=lambda (word, path): len(word))

 编辑：过滤掉长度小于 3 个字母的单词。
  编辑 2： 我很好奇为什么 Kent Fredric 的 Perl 解决方案更快；   结果是使用正则表达式匹配而不是一组字符。   在 Python 中做同样的事情，速度大约会提高一倍。
, re.I).match

words = set(word.rstrip('\n') for word in open('words') if bogglable(word))
prefixes = set(word[:i] for word in words
               for i in range(2, len(word)+1))

def solve():
    for y, row in enumerate(grid):
        for x, letter in enumerate(row):
            for result in extending(letter, ((x, y),)):
                yield result

def extending(prefix, path):
    if prefix in words:
        yield (prefix, path)
    for (nx, ny) in neighbors(path[-1]):
        if (nx, ny) not in path:
            prefix1 = prefix + grid[ny][nx]
            if prefix1 in prefixes:
                for result in extending(prefix1, path + ((nx, ny),)):
                    yield result

def neighbors((x, y)):
    for nx in range(max(0, x-1), min(x+2, ncols)):
        for ny in range(max(0, y-1), min(y+2, nrows)):
            yield (nx, ny)

用法示例：

编辑：过滤掉长度小于 3 个字母的单词。

编辑 2： 我很好奇为什么 Kent Fredric 的 Perl 解决方案更快； 结果是使用正则表达式匹配而不是一组字符。 在 Python 中做同样的事情，速度大约会提高一倍。

Answer 2

您将获得的最快解决方案可能是将您的字典存储在 trie 中。 然后，创建一个三元组队列（x、y、s），其中队列中的每个元素对应一个前缀 s 可以在网格中拼写的单词，以位置 (x, y) 结尾。 使用 N x N 个元素（其中 N 是网格的大小）初始化队列，网格中的每个方块对应一个元素。 然后，算法如下进行：

While the queue is not empty:
  Dequeue a triple (x, y, s)
  For each square (x', y') with letter c adjacent to (x, y):
    If s+c is a word, output s+c
    If s+c is a prefix of a word, insert (x', y', s+c) into the queue

如果将字典存储在 trie 中，则可以在常量中测试 s+c 是否是单词或单词的前缀时间（假设你还在每个队列数据中保留一些额外的元数据，例如指向 trie 中当前节点的指针），因此该算法的运行时间为 O(可以拼写的单词数)。

[编辑] 这是我刚刚编写的 Python 实现：

#!/usr/bin/python

class TrieNode:
    def __init__(self, parent, value):
        self.parent = parent
        self.children = [None] * 26
        self.isWord = False
        if parent is not None:
            parent.children[ord(value) - 97] = self

def MakeTrie(dictfile):
    dict = open(dictfile)
    root = TrieNode(None, '')
    for word in dict:
        curNode = root
        for letter in word.lower():
            if 97 <= ord(letter) < 123:
                nextNode = curNode.children[ord(letter) - 97]
                if nextNode is None:
                    nextNode = TrieNode(curNode, letter)
                curNode = nextNode
        curNode.isWord = True
    return root

def BoggleWords(grid, dict):
    rows = len(grid)
    cols = len(grid[0])
    queue = []
    words = []
    for y in range(cols):
        for x in range(rows):
            c = grid[y][x]
            node = dict.children[ord(c) - 97]
            if node is not None:
                queue.append((x, y, c, node))
    while queue:
        x, y, s, node = queue[0]
        del queue[0]
        for dx, dy in ((1, 0), (1, -1), (0, -1), (-1, -1), (-1, 0), (-1, 1), (0, 1), (1, 1)):
            x2, y2 = x + dx, y + dy
            if 0 <= x2 < cols and 0 <= y2 < rows:
                s2 = s + grid[y2][x2]
                node2 = node.children[ord(grid[y2][x2]) - 97]
                if node2 is not None:
                    if node2.isWord:
                        words.append(s2)
                    queue.append((x2, y2, s2, node2))

    return words

示例用法：

d = MakeTrie('/usr/share/dict/words')
print(BoggleWords(['fxie','amlo','ewbx','astu'], d))

输出：

['fa', 'xi', 'ie', 'io', 'el', 'am', 'ax', 'ae', 'aw', 'mi', 'ma', 'me ', 'lo', 'li', 'oe', 'ox', 'em', 'ea', 'ea', 'es', 'wa', '我们', 'wa', 'bo', 'bu'、'as'、'aw'、'ae'、'st'、'se'、'sa'、'tu'、'ut'、'fam'、'fae'、'imi'、'eli ', 'elm', 'elb', 'ami', 'ama', 'ame', 'aes', '锥子', 'awa', 'awe', 'awa', 'mix', 'mim', “mil”、“mam”、“max”、“mae”、“maw”、“mew”、“mem”、“mes”、“lob”、“lox”、“lei”、“leo”、“lie” ', 'lim', '油', 'olm', 'ewe', 'eme', '蜡', 'waf', 'wae', 'waw', 'wem', 'wea', 'wea', '是'、'waw'、'wae'、'鲍勃'、'blo'、'bub'、'但是'、'ast'、'ase'、'asa'、'锥子'、'awa'、'敬畏', 'awa', 'aes', 'swa', 'swa', 'sew', '海', '海', '锯', '晚礼服', '浴缸', 'tut', 'twa', 'twa'、'tst'、'utu'、'fama'、'fame'、'ixil'、'imam'、'amli'、'amil'、'ambo'、'axil'、'axle'、'mimi ', 'mima', 'mime', 'milo', 'mile', 'mewl', 'mese', 'mesa', 'lolo', 'lobo', 'lima', 'lime', 'limb', 'lile'、'oime'、'oleo'、'olio'、'双簧管'、'obol'、'emim'、'emil'、'east'、'ease'、'wame'、'wawa'、'wawa ', 'weam', '西', 'wese', 'wast', 'wase', 'wawa', 'wawa', 'boil', 'bolo', 'bole', 'bobo', 'blob', “bleo”、“bubo”、“asem”、“stub”、“stut”、“swam”、“semi”、“seme”、“seam”、“seax”、“sasa”、“sawt”、“tutu” ', 'tuts', 'twae', 'twas', 'twae', 'ilima', 'amble', 'axile', 'awest', 'mamie', 'mambo', 'maxim', 'mease', 'mesem'、'limax'、'limes'、'limbo'、'limbu'、'obole'、'emesa'、'embox'、'awest'、'swami'、'famble'、'mimble'、'maxima '、'embolo'、'embole'、'wamble'、'semese'、'semble'、'sawbwa'、'sawbwa']

注意：该程序不输出 1 个字母的单词，也不按单词长度进行过滤。 这很容易添加，但与问题并不真正相关。 如果某些单词可以多种方式拼写，它还会多次输出这些单词。 如果给定的单词可以用多种不同的方式拼写（最坏的情况：网格中的每个字母都是相同的（例如“A”）并且像“aaaaaaaaaa”这样的单词在您的字典中），那么运行时间将变得可怕的指数级。 算法完成后，过滤掉重复项并进行排序就很简单了。

Answer 3

对于字典加速，您可以执行一种通用转换/过程来大大减少提前的字典比较。

鉴于上面的网格仅包含 16 个字符，其中一些是重复的，您可以通过简单地过滤掉具有无法到达的字符的条目来大大减少字典中的总键数。

我认为这是显而易见的优化，但看到没有人这样做，我才提到它。

仅仅在输入过程中，它就将我的字典从 200,000 个键减少到只有 2,000 个键。 这至少减少了内存开销，并且肯定会映射到某个地方的速度增加，因为内存不是无限快的。

Perl 实现

我的实现有点头重脚轻，因为我很重视能够知道每个提取的字符串的确切路径，而不仅仅是其中的有效性。

我还在那里进行了一些调整，理论上允许带有孔的网格以及具有不同尺寸线的网格发挥作用（假设您输入正确并且它以某种方式排列）。

正如之前所怀疑的那样，早期过滤器是迄今为止我的应用程序中最显着的瓶颈，注释掉该行使其从 1.5 秒膨胀到 7.5 秒。

执行后，它似乎认为所有单位数字都在其自己的有效单词上，但我很确定这是由于字典文件的工作方式所致。

虽然有点臃肿，但至少我重用了 cpan 的 Tree::Trie ，

其中有一些受到启发部分是由现有的实现实现的，其中一些是我已经想到的。

欢迎提出建设性批评和改进方法（/me 指出他从未在 CPAN 中搜索过令人难以置信的求解器 ，但这更有趣）

更新了新标准

#!/usr/bin/perl 

use strict;
use warnings;

{

  # this package manages a given path through the grid.
  # Its an array of matrix-nodes in-order with
  # Convenience functions for pretty-printing the paths
  # and for extending paths as new paths.

  # Usage:
  # my $p = Prefix->new(path=>[ $startnode ]);
  # my $c = $p->child( $extensionNode );
  # print $c->current_word ;

  package Prefix;
  use Moose;

  has path => (
      isa     => 'ArrayRef[MatrixNode]',
      is      => 'rw',
      default => sub { [] },
  );
  has current_word => (
      isa        => 'Str',
      is         => 'rw',
      lazy_build => 1,
  );

  # Create a clone of this object
  # with a longer path

  # $o->child( $successive-node-on-graph );

  sub child {
      my $self    = shift;
      my $newNode = shift;
      my $f       = Prefix->new();

      # Have to do this manually or other recorded paths get modified
      push @{ $f->{path} }, @{ $self->{path} }, $newNode;
      return $f;
  }

  # Traverses $o->path left-to-right to get the string it represents.

  sub _build_current_word {
      my $self = shift;
      return join q{}, map { $_->{value} } @{ $self->{path} };
  }

  # Returns  the rightmost node on this path

  sub tail {
      my $self = shift;
      return $self->{path}->[-1];
  }

  # pretty-format $o->path

  sub pp_path {
      my $self = shift;
      my @path =
        map { '[' . $_->{x_position} . ',' . $_->{y_position} . ']' }
        @{ $self->{path} };
      return "[" . join( ",", @path ) . "]";
  }

  # pretty-format $o
  sub pp {
      my $self = shift;
      return $self->current_word . ' => ' . $self->pp_path;
  }

  __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
}

{

  # Basic package for tracking node data
  # without having to look on the grid.
  # I could have just used an array or a hash, but that got ugly.

# Once the matrix is up and running it doesn't really care so much about rows/columns,
# Its just a sea of points and each point has adjacent points.
# Relative positioning is only really useful to map it back to userspace

  package MatrixNode;
  use Moose;

  has x_position => ( isa => 'Int', is => 'rw', required => 1 );
  has y_position => ( isa => 'Int', is => 'rw', required => 1 );
  has value      => ( isa => 'Str', is => 'rw', required => 1 );
  has siblings   => (
      isa     => 'ArrayRef[MatrixNode]',
      is      => 'rw',
      default => sub { [] }
  );

# Its not implicitly uni-directional joins. It would be more effient in therory
# to make the link go both ways at the same time, but thats too hard to program around.
# and besides, this isn't slow enough to bother caring about.

  sub add_sibling {
      my $self    = shift;
      my $sibling = shift;
      push @{ $self->siblings }, $sibling;
  }

  # Convenience method to derive a path starting at this node

  sub to_path {
      my $self = shift;
      return Prefix->new( path => [$self] );
  }
  __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;

}

{

  package Matrix;
  use Moose;

  has rows => (
      isa     => 'ArrayRef',
      is      => 'rw',
      default => sub { [] },
  );

  has regex => (
      isa        => 'Regexp',
      is         => 'rw',
      lazy_build => 1,
  );

  has cells => (
      isa        => 'ArrayRef',
      is         => 'rw',
      lazy_build => 1,
  );

  sub add_row {
      my $self = shift;
      push @{ $self->rows }, [@_];
  }

  # Most of these functions from here down are just builder functions,
  # or utilities to help build things.
  # Some just broken out to make it easier for me to process.
  # All thats really useful is add_row
  # The rest will generally be computed, stored, and ready to go
  # from ->cells by the time either ->cells or ->regex are called.

  # traverse all cells and make a regex that covers them.
  sub _build_regex {
      my $self  = shift;
      my $chars = q{};
      for my $cell ( @{ $self->cells } ) {
          $chars .= $cell->value();
      }
      $chars = "[^$chars]";
      return qr/$chars/i;
  }

  # convert a plain cell ( ie: [x][y] = 0 )
  # to an intelligent cell ie: [x][y] = object( x, y )
  # we only really keep them in this format temporarily
  # so we can go through and tie in neighbouring information.
  # after the neigbouring is done, the grid should be considered inoperative.

  sub _convert {
      my $self = shift;
      my $x    = shift;
      my $y    = shift;
      my $v    = $self->_read( $x, $y );
      my $n    = MatrixNode->new(
          x_position => $x,
          y_position => $y,
          value      => $v,
      );
      $self->_write( $x, $y, $n );
      return $n;
  }

# go through the rows/collums presently available and freeze them into objects.

  sub _build_cells {
      my $self = shift;
      my @out  = ();
      my @rows = @{ $self->{rows} };
      for my $x ( 0 .. $#rows ) {
          next unless defined $self->{rows}->[$x];
          my @col = @{ $self->{rows}->[$x] };
          for my $y ( 0 .. $#col ) {
              next unless defined $self->{rows}->[$x]->[$y];
              push @out, $self->_convert( $x, $y );
          }
      }
      for my $c (@out) {
          for my $n ( $self->_neighbours( $c->x_position, $c->y_position ) ) {
              $c->add_sibling( $self->{rows}->[ $n->[0] ]->[ $n->[1] ] );
          }
      }
      return \@out;
  }

  # given x,y , return array of points that refer to valid neighbours.
  sub _neighbours {
      my $self = shift;
      my $x    = shift;
      my $y    = shift;
      my @out  = ();
      for my $sx ( -1, 0, 1 ) {
          next if $sx + $x < 0;
          next if not defined $self->{rows}->[ $sx + $x ];
          for my $sy ( -1, 0, 1 ) {
              next if $sx == 0 && $sy == 0;
              next if $sy + $y < 0;
              next if not defined $self->{rows}->[ $sx + $x ]->[ $sy + $y ];
              push @out, [ $sx + $x, $sy + $y ];
          }
      }
      return @out;
  }

  sub _has_row {
      my $self = shift;
      my $x    = shift;
      return defined $self->{rows}->[$x];
  }

  sub _has_cell {
      my $self = shift;
      my $x    = shift;
      my $y    = shift;
      return defined $self->{rows}->[$x]->[$y];
  }

  sub _read {
      my $self = shift;
      my $x    = shift;
      my $y    = shift;
      return $self->{rows}->[$x]->[$y];
  }

  sub _write {
      my $self = shift;
      my $x    = shift;
      my $y    = shift;
      my $v    = shift;
      $self->{rows}->[$x]->[$y] = $v;
      return $v;
  }

  __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
}

use Tree::Trie;

sub readDict {
  my $fn = shift;
  my $re = shift;
  my $d  = Tree::Trie->new();

  # Dictionary Loading
  open my $fh, '<', $fn;
  while ( my $line = <$fh> ) {
      chomp($line);

 # Commenting the next line makes it go from 1.5 seconds to 7.5 seconds. EPIC.
      next if $line =~ $re;    # Early Filter
      $d->add( uc($line) );
  }
  return $d;
}

sub traverseGraph {
  my $d     = shift;
  my $m     = shift;
  my $min   = shift;
  my $max   = shift;
  my @words = ();

  # Inject all grid nodes into the processing queue.

  my @queue =
    grep { $d->lookup( $_->current_word ) }
    map  { $_->to_path } @{ $m->cells };

  while (@queue) {
      my $item = shift @queue;

      # put the dictionary into "exact match" mode.

      $d->deepsearch('exact');

      my $cword = $item->current_word;
      my $l     = length($cword);

      if ( $l >= $min && $d->lookup($cword) ) {
          push @words,
            $item;    # push current path into "words" if it exactly matches.
      }
      next if $l > $max;

      # put the dictionary into "is-a-prefix" mode.
      $d->deepsearch('boolean');

    siblingloop: foreach my $sibling ( @{ $item->tail->siblings } ) {
          foreach my $visited ( @{ $item->{path} } ) {
              next siblingloop if $sibling == $visited;
          }

          # given path y , iterate for all its end points
          my $subpath = $item->child($sibling);

          # create a new path for each end-point
          if ( $d->lookup( $subpath->current_word ) ) {

             # if the new path is a prefix, add it to the bottom of the queue.
              push @queue, $subpath;
          }
      }
  }
  return \@words;
}

sub setup_predetermined { 
  my $m = shift; 
  my $gameNo = shift;
  if( $gameNo == 0 ){
      $m->add_row(qw( F X I E ));
      $m->add_row(qw( A M L O ));
      $m->add_row(qw( E W B X ));
      $m->add_row(qw( A S T U ));
      return $m;
  }
  if( $gameNo == 1 ){
      $m->add_row(qw( D G H I ));
      $m->add_row(qw( K L P S ));
      $m->add_row(qw( Y E U T ));
      $m->add_row(qw( E O R N ));
      return $m;
  }
}
sub setup_random { 
  my $m = shift; 
  my $seed = shift;
  srand $seed;
  my @letters = 'A' .. 'Z' ; 
  for( 1 .. 4 ){ 
      my @r = ();
      for( 1 .. 4 ){
          push @r , $letters[int(rand(25))];
      }
      $m->add_row( @r );
  }
}

# Here is where the real work starts.

my $m = Matrix->new();
setup_predetermined( $m, 0 );
#setup_random( $m, 5 );

my $d = readDict( 'dict.txt', $m->regex );
my $c = scalar @{ $m->cells };    # get the max, as per spec

print join ",\n", map { $_->pp } @{
  traverseGraph( $d, $m, 3, $c ) ;
};

用于比较的架构/执行信息：

model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T9300  @ 2.50GHz
cache size      : 6144 KB
Memory usage summary: heap total: 77057577, heap peak: 11446200, stack peak: 26448
       total calls   total memory   failed calls
 malloc|     947212       68763684              0
realloc|      11191        1045641              0  (nomove:9063, dec:4731, free:0)
 calloc|     121001        7248252              0
   free|     973159       65854762

Histogram for block sizes:
  0-15         392633  36% ==================================================
 16-31          43530   4% =====
 32-47          50048   4% ======
 48-63          70701   6% =========
 64-79          18831   1% ==
 80-95          19271   1% ==
 96-111        238398  22% ==============================
112-127          3007  <1% 
128-143        236727  21% ==============================

关于正则表达式优化的更多抱怨

我使用的正则表达式优化对于多求解字典和多解字典来说是无用的-解决你需要一本完整的词典，而不是预先修剪过的词典。

然而，话虽如此，对于一次性解决方案来说，它确实很快。 （Perl 正则表达式是 C 语言！:)）

这里添加了一些不同的代码：

sub readDict_nofilter {
  my $fn = shift;
  my $re = shift;
  my $d  = Tree::Trie->new();

  # Dictionary Loading
  open my $fh, '<', $fn;
  while ( my $line = <$fh> ) {
      chomp($line);
      $d->add( uc($line) );
  }
  return $d;
}

sub benchmark_io { 
  use Benchmark qw( cmpthese :hireswallclock );
   # generate a random 16 character string 
   # to simulate there being an input grid. 
  my $regexen = sub { 
      my @letters = 'A' .. 'Z' ; 
      my @lo = ();
      for( 1..16 ){ 
          push @lo , $_ ; 
      }
      my $c  = join '', @lo;
      $c = "[^$c]";
      return qr/$c/i;
  };
  cmpthese( 200 , { 
      filtered => sub { 
          readDict('dict.txt', $regexen->() );
      }, 
      unfiltered => sub {
          readDict_nofilter('dict.txt');
      }
  });
}

           s/iter unfiltered   filtered
unfiltered   8.16         --       -94%
filtered    0.464      1658%         --

_{ps：8.16 * 200 = 27 分钟。}

Answer 4

您可以将问题分为两部分：

1. 某种搜索算法，它将枚举网格中可能的字符串。
2. 一种测试字符串是否为有效单词的方法。

理想情况下，(2) 还应该包括一种测试字符串是否是有效单词前缀的方法 - 这将允许您修剪搜索并节省大量时间。

Adam Rosenfield 的 Trie 是 (2) 的解。 它很优雅，可能是您的算法专家所喜欢的，但对于现代语言和现代计算机，我们可能会有点懒。 此外，正如肯特建议的那样，我们可以通过丢弃网格中不存在的字母的单词来减小字典的大小。 这是一些Python：

def make_lookups(grid, fn='dict.txt'):
    # Make set of valid characters.
    chars = set()
    for word in grid:
        chars.update(word)

    words = set(x.strip() for x in open(fn) if set(x.strip()) <= chars)
    prefixes = set()
    for w in words:
        for i in range(len(w)+1):
            prefixes.add(w[:i])

    return words, prefixes

哇； 恒定时间前缀测试。 加载您链接的字典需要几秒钟，但只需要几秒钟:-)（请注意 words <= prefixes）

现在，对于第 (1) 部分，我倾向于认为就图表而言。 因此，我将构建一个看起来像这样的字典：

graph = { (x, y):set([(x0,y0), (x1,y1), (x2,y2)]), }

即 graph[(x, y)] 是您可以从位置 (x, y) 到达的坐标集代码>. 我还将添加一个虚拟节点 None 它将连接到所有内容。

构建它有点笨拙，因为有 8 个可能的位置，而且您必须进行边界检查。 下面是一些相对笨拙的 Python 代码：

def make_graph(grid):
    root = None
    graph = { root:set() }
    chardict = { root:'' }

    for i, row in enumerate(grid):
        for j, char in enumerate(row):
            chardict[(i, j)] = char
            node = (i, j)
            children = set()
            graph[node] = children
            graph[root].add(node)
            add_children(node, children, grid)

    return graph, chardict

def add_children(node, children, grid):
    x0, y0 = node
    for i in [-1,0,1]:
        x = x0 + i
        if not (0 <= x < len(grid)):
            continue
        for j in [-1,0,1]:
            y = y0 + j
            if not (0 <= y < len(grid[0])) or (i == j == 0):
                continue

            children.add((x,y))

该代码还构建了一个字典，将 (x,y) 映射到相应的字符。 这让我可以将位置列表转换为一个单词：

def to_word(chardict, pos_list):
    return ''.join(chardict[x] for x in pos_list)

最后，我们进行深度优先搜索。 基本过程是：

1. 搜索到达特定节点。
2. 检查到目前为止的路径是否可以是单词的一部分。 如果没有，请不要进一步探索该分支。
3. 检查到目前为止的路径是否是一个单词。 如果是这样，请添加到结果列表中。
4. 探索迄今为止不属于路径的所有孩子。

Python：

def find_words(graph, chardict, position, prefix, results, words, prefixes):
    """ Arguments:
      graph :: mapping (x,y) to set of reachable positions
      chardict :: mapping (x,y) to character
      position :: current position (x,y) -- equals prefix[-1]
      prefix :: list of positions in current string
      results :: set of words found
      words :: set of valid words in the dictionary
      prefixes :: set of valid words or prefixes thereof
    """
    word = to_word(chardict, prefix)

    if word not in prefixes:
        return

    if word in words:
        results.add(word)

    for child in graph[position]:
        if child not in prefix:
            find_words(graph, chardict, child, prefix+[child], results, words, prefixes)

运行代码：

grid = ['fxie', 'amlo', 'ewbx', 'astu']
g, c = make_graph(grid)
w, p = make_lookups(grid)
res = set()
find_words(g, c, None, [], res, w, p)

并检查 res 以查看答案。 以下是为您的示例找到的单词列表，按大小排序：

 ['a', 'b', 'e', 'f', 'i', 'l', 'm', 'o', 's', 't',
 'u', 'w', 'x', 'ae', 'am', 'as', 'aw', 'ax', 'bo',
 'bu', 'ea', 'el', 'em', 'es', 'fa', 'ie', 'io', 'li',
 'lo', 'ma', 'me', 'mi', 'oe', 'ox', 'sa', 'se', 'st',
 'tu', 'ut', 'wa', 'we', 'xi', 'aes', 'ame', 'ami',
 'ase', 'ast', 'awa', 'awe', 'awl', 'blo', 'but', 'elb',
 'elm', 'fae', 'fam', 'lei', 'lie', 'lim', 'lob', 'lox',
 'mae', 'maw', 'mew', 'mil', 'mix', 'oil', 'olm', 'saw',
 'sea', 'sew', 'swa', 'tub', 'tux', 'twa', 'wae', 'was',
 'wax', 'wem', 'ambo', 'amil', 'amli', 'asem', 'axil',
 'axle', 'bleo', 'boil', 'bole', 'east', 'fame', 'limb',
 'lime', 'mesa', 'mewl', 'mile', 'milo', 'oime', 'sawt',
 'seam', 'seax', 'semi', 'stub', 'swam', 'twae', 'twas',
 'wame', 'wase', 'wast', 'weam', 'west', 'amble', 'awest',
 'axile', 'embox', 'limbo', 'limes', 'swami', 'embole',
 'famble', 'semble', 'wamble']

代码（实际上）需要几秒钟来加载字典，但其余部分在我的机器上是即时的。

Answer 5

我在Java中的尝试。 读取文件和构建 trie 大约需要 2 秒，解决难题大约需要 50 毫秒。 我使用了问题中链接的字典（它有一些我不知道英语中存在的单词，例如fae、ima）

0 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.util.Util  - Reading the dictionary
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.util.Util  - Finish reading the dictionary
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: FAM
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: FAME
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: FAMBLE
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: FAE
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: IMA
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: ELI
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: ELM
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: ELB
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AXIL
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AXILE
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AXLE
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AMI
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AMIL
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AMLI
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AME
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AMBLE
2234 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AMBO
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AES
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWEST
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MIX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MIL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MILE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MILO
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MAX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MAE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MAW
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MEW
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MEWL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MES
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MESA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: MWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIMA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIMAX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIME
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIMES
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIMB
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIMBO
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LIMBU
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LEI
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LEO
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LOB
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: LOX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: OIME
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: OIL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: OLE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: OLM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: EMIL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: EMBOLE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: EMBOX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: EAST
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAF
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAME
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAMBLE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WEA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WEAM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WEM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WEA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WES
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WEST
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAS
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WASE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: WAST
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: BLEO
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: BLO
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: BOIL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: BOLE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: BUT
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AES
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWL
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AWEST
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: ASE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: ASEM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: AST
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEAX
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEAM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEMI
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEMBLE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEW
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SEA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SWAM
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SWAMI
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SAW
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: SAWT
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: STU
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: STUB
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TWAE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TWA
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TWAE
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TWAS
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TUB
2250 [main] INFO gineer.bogglesolver.Solver  - Found: TUX

源代码由6个类组成。 我将在下面发布它们（如果这不是 StackOverflow 上的正确做法，请告诉我）。

gineer.bogglesolver.Main

package gineer.bogglesolver;

import org.apache.log4j.BasicConfigurator;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;

public class Main
{
    private final static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(Main.class);

    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
        BasicConfigurator.configure();

        Solver solver = new Solver(4,
                        "FXIE" +
                        "AMLO" +
                        "EWBX" +
                        "ASTU");
        solver.solve();

    }
}

gineer.bogglesolver.Solver

package gineer.bogglesolver;

import gineer.bogglesolver.trie.Trie;
import gineer.bogglesolver.util.Constants;
import gineer.bogglesolver.util.Util;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;

public class Solver
{
    private char[] puzzle;
    private int maxSize;

    private boolean[] used;
    private StringBuilder stringSoFar;

    private boolean[][] matrix;
    private Trie trie;

    private final static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(Solver.class);

    public Solver(int size, String puzzle)
    {
        trie = Util.getTrie(size);
        matrix = Util.connectivityMatrix(size);

        maxSize = size * size;
        stringSoFar = new StringBuilder(maxSize);
        used = new boolean[maxSize];

        if (puzzle.length() == maxSize)
        {
            this.puzzle = puzzle.toCharArray();
        }
        else
        {
            logger.error("The puzzle size does not match the size specified: " + puzzle.length());
            this.puzzle = puzzle.substring(0, maxSize).toCharArray();
        }
    }

    public void solve()
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < maxSize; i++)
        {
            traverseAt(i);
        }
    }

    private void traverseAt(int origin)
    {
        stringSoFar.append(puzzle[origin]);
        used[origin] = true;

        //Check if we have a valid word
        if ((stringSoFar.length() >= Constants.MINIMUM_WORD_LENGTH) && (trie.containKey(stringSoFar.toString())))
        {
            logger.info("Found: " + stringSoFar.toString());
        }

        //Find where to go next
        for (int destination = 0; destination < maxSize; destination++)
        {
            if (matrix[origin][destination] && !used[destination] && trie.containPrefix(stringSoFar.toString() + puzzle[destination]))
            {
                traverseAt(destination);
            }
        }

        used[origin] = false;
        stringSoFar.deleteCharAt(stringSoFar.length() - 1);
    }

}

gineer.bogglesolver.trie.Node

package gineer.bogglesolver.trie;

import gineer.bogglesolver.util.Constants;

class Node
{
    Node[] children;
    boolean isKey;

    public Node()
    {
        isKey = false;
        children = new Node[Constants.NUMBER_LETTERS_IN_ALPHABET];
    }

    public Node(boolean key)
    {
        isKey = key;
        children = new Node[Constants.NUMBER_LETTERS_IN_ALPHABET];
    }

    /**
     Method to insert a string to Node and its children

     @param key the string to insert (the string is assumed to be uppercase)
     @return true if the node or one of its children is changed, false otherwise
     */
    public boolean insert(String key)
    {
        //If the key is empty, this node is a key
        if (key.length() == 0)
        {
            if (isKey)
                return false;
            else
            {
                isKey = true;
                return true;
            }
        }
        else
        {//otherwise, insert in one of its child

            int childNodePosition = key.charAt(0) - Constants.LETTER_A;
            if (children[childNodePosition] == null)
            {
                children[childNodePosition] = new Node();
                children[childNodePosition].insert(key.substring(1));
                return true;
            }
            else
            {
                return children[childNodePosition].insert(key.substring(1));
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     Returns whether key is a valid prefix for certain key in this trie.
     For example: if key "hello" is in this trie, tests with all prefixes "hel", "hell", "hello" return true

     @param prefix the prefix to check
     @return true if the prefix is valid, false otherwise
     */
    public boolean containPrefix(String prefix)
    {
        //If the prefix is empty, return true
        if (prefix.length() == 0)
        {
            return true;
        }
        else
        {//otherwise, check in one of its child
            int childNodePosition = prefix.charAt(0) - Constants.LETTER_A;
            return children[childNodePosition] != null && children[childNodePosition].containPrefix(prefix.substring(1));
        }
    }

    /**
     Returns whether key is a valid key in this trie.
     For example: if key "hello" is in this trie, tests with all prefixes "hel", "hell" return false

     @param key the key to check
     @return true if the key is valid, false otherwise
     */
    public boolean containKey(String key)
    {
        //If the prefix is empty, return true
        if (key.length() == 0)
        {
            return isKey;
        }
        else
        {//otherwise, check in one of its child
            int childNodePosition = key.charAt(0) - Constants.LETTER_A;
            return children[childNodePosition] != null && children[childNodePosition].containKey(key.substring(1));
        }
    }

    public boolean isKey()
    {
        return isKey;
    }

    public void setKey(boolean key)
    {
        isKey = key;
    }
}

gineer.bogglesolver.trie.Trie

package gineer.bogglesolver.trie;

public class Trie
{
    Node root;

    public Trie()
    {
        this.root = new Node();
    }

    /**
     Method to insert a string to Node and its children

     @param key the string to insert (the string is assumed to be uppercase)
     @return true if the node or one of its children is changed, false otherwise
     */
    public boolean insert(String key)
    {
        return root.insert(key.toUpperCase());
    }

    /**
     Returns whether key is a valid prefix for certain key in this trie.
     For example: if key "hello" is in this trie, tests with all prefixes "hel", "hell", "hello" return true

     @param prefix the prefix to check
     @return true if the prefix is valid, false otherwise
     */
    public boolean containPrefix(String prefix)
    {
        return root.containPrefix(prefix.toUpperCase());
    }

    /**
     Returns whether key is a valid key in this trie.
     For example: if key "hello" is in this trie, tests with all prefixes "hel", "hell" return false

     @param key the key to check
     @return true if the key is valid, false otherwise
     */
    public boolean containKey(String key)
    {
        return root.containKey(key.toUpperCase());
    }


}

gineer.bogglesolver.util.

package gineer.bogglesolver.util;

public class Constants
{

    public static final int NUMBER_LETTERS_IN_ALPHABET = 26;
    public static final char LETTER_A = 'A';
    public static final int MINIMUM_WORD_LENGTH = 3;
    public static final int DEFAULT_PUZZLE_SIZE = 4;
}

常量gineer.bogglesolver.util.Util

package gineer.bogglesolver.util;

import gineer.bogglesolver.trie.Trie;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;

import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.util.Scanner;

public class Util
{
    private final static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(Util.class);
    private static Trie trie;
    private static int size = Constants.DEFAULT_PUZZLE_SIZE;

    /**
     Returns the trie built from the dictionary.  The size is used to eliminate words that are too long.

     @param size the size of puzzle.  The maximum lenght of words in the returned trie is (size * size)
     @return the trie that can be used for puzzle of that size
     */
    public static Trie getTrie(int size)
    {
        if ((trie != null) && size == Util.size)
            return trie;

        trie = new Trie();
        Util.size = size;

        logger.info("Reading the dictionary");
        final File file = new File("dictionary.txt");
        try
        {
            Scanner scanner = new Scanner(file);
            final int maxSize = size * size;
            while (scanner.hasNext())
            {
                String line = scanner.nextLine().replaceAll("[^\\p{Alpha}]", "");

                if (line.length() <= maxSize)
                    trie.insert(line);
            }
        }
        catch (FileNotFoundException e)
        {
            logger.error("Cannot open file", e);
        }

        logger.info("Finish reading the dictionary");
        return trie;
    }

    static boolean[] connectivityRow(int x, int y, int size)
    {
        boolean[] squares = new boolean[size * size];
        for (int offsetX = -1; offsetX <= 1; offsetX++)
        {
            for (int offsetY = -1; offsetY <= 1; offsetY++)
            {
                final int calX = x + offsetX;
                final int calY = y + offsetY;
                if ((calX >= 0) && (calX < size) && (calY >= 0) && (calY < size))
                    squares[calY * size + calX] = true;
            }
        }

        squares[y * size + x] = false;//the current x, y is false

        return squares;
    }

    /**
     Returns the matrix of connectivity between two points.  Point i can go to point j iff matrix[i][j] is true
     Square (x, y) is equivalent to point (size * y + x).  For example, square (1,1) is point 5 in a puzzle of size 4

     @param size the size of the puzzle
     @return the connectivity matrix
     */
    public static boolean[][] connectivityMatrix(int size)
    {
        boolean[][] matrix = new boolean[size * size][];
        for (int x = 0; x < size; x++)
        {
            for (int y = 0; y < size; y++)
            {
                matrix[y * size + x] = connectivityRow(x, y, size);
            }
        }
        return matrix;
    }
}

Answer 6

我认为您可能会花费大部分时间尝试匹配无法通过字母网格构建的单词。 所以，我要做的第一件事就是尝试加快这一步，这应该能让你顺利完成任务。

为此，我会将网格重新表示为可能的“移动”表，您可以通过正在查看的字母转换来索引该表。

首先为每个字母分配整个字母表中的一个数字（A=0、B=1、C=2，...等等）。

让我们举个例子：

h b c d
e e g h
l l k l
m o f p

现在，让我们使用我们拥有的字母的字母表（通常您可能希望每次都使用相同的整个字母表）：

 b | c | d | e | f | g | h | k | l | m |  o |  p
---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----+----
 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11

然后您创建一个 2D 布尔数组来告诉您是否有某个字母可用转换：

     |  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11  <- from letter
     |  b  c  d  e  f  g  h  k  l  m  o  p
-----+--------------------------------------
 0 b |     T     T     T  T     
 1 c |  T     T  T     T  T
 2 d |     T           T  T
 3 e |  T  T     T     T  T  T  T
 4 f |                       T  T     T  T
 5 g |  T  T  T  T        T  T  T
 6 h |  T  T  T  T     T     T  T
 7 k |           T  T  T  T     T     T  T
 8 l |           T  T  T  T  T  T  T  T  T
 9 m |                          T     T
10 o |              T        T  T  T
11 p |              T        T  T
 ^
 to letter

现在浏览您的单词列表并将单词转换为转换：

hello (6, 3, 8, 8, 10):
6 -> 3, 3 -> 8, 8 -> 8, 8 -> 10

然后通过在表中查找这些转换来检查是否允许这些转换：

[6][ 3] : T
[3][ 8] : T
[8][ 8] : T
[8][10] : T

如果全部允许，则有可能找到该单词。

例如，可以在第四个转换（m 到 e：helMEt）中排除单词“helmet”，因为表中的该条目是错误的。

并且可以排除“仓鼠”一词，因为不允许第一个（h 到 a）转换（甚至在您的表中不存在）。

现在，对于您没有消除的可能很少的剩余单词，请尝试按照您现在的方式或按照此处其他一些答案中的建议在网格中实际找到它们。 这是为了避免由于网格中相同字母之间的跳转而导致误报。 例如，表允许使用单词“help”，但网格不允许使用单词“help”。

关于这个想法的一些进一步的性能改进技巧：

1. 不要使用二维数组，而是使用一维数组并简单地自己计算第二个字母的索引。 因此，不要像上面那样使用 12x12 数组，而是制作一个长度为 144 的一维数组。如果您始终使用相同的字母表（即标准英语字母表的 26x26 = 676x1 数组），即使并非所有字母都出现在网格中，您可以预先计算该一维数组的索引，您需要测试该索引以匹配字典单词。 例如，上例中“hello”的索引为

   <前><代码>你好（6、3、8、8、10）：
   42（来自 6 + 3x12）、99、104、128
   -> “hello”将在字典中存储为 42, 99, 104, 128

2. 将想法扩展到 3D 表（表示为 1D 数组），即所有允许的 3 字母组合。 这样，您可以立即消除更多单词，并将每个单词的数组查找次数减少 1：对于“hello”，您只需要 3 次数组查找：hel、ell、llo。 顺便说一句，构建这个表格会非常快，因为网格中只有 400 个可能的 3 字母移动。

3. 预先计算网格中需要包含在表中的移动索引。 对于上面的示例，您需要将以下条目设置为“True”：

   <前><代码>(0,0) (0,1) -> 这里：h，b：[6][0]
   (0,0) (1,0)→ 这里：h，e：[6][3]
   (0,0) (1,1)→ 这里：h，e：[6][3]
   (0,1) (0,0)→ 这里：b，h：[0][6]
   (0,1) (0,2)→ 这里：b，c：[0][1]
   。
   :

4. 同时将您的游戏网格表示为具有 16 个条目的一维数组，并在 3. 中预先计算表，并将索引包含到该数组中。

我确信如果您使用这种方法，如果您预先计算了字典并已将其加载到内存中，您可以让代码运行得非常快。

顺便说一句：如果您正在构建游戏，另一件好事就是立即在后台运行这些事情。 当用户仍在查看应用程序上的标题屏幕并将手指放在按“开始”的位置时，开始生成并解决第一个游戏。 然后在用户玩上一个游戏时生成并解决下一个游戏。 这应该会给你很多时间来运行你的代码。

（我喜欢这个问题，所以我可能会在接下来的几天里用 Java 实现我的建议，看看它的实际执行情况......一旦我这样做，我就会在这里发布代码。）

更新：

好的，我今天有一段时间用Java实现了这个想法：

class DictionaryEntry {
  public int[] letters;
  public int[] triplets;
}

class BoggleSolver {

  // Constants
  final int ALPHABET_SIZE = 5;  // up to 2^5 = 32 letters
  final int BOARD_SIZE    = 4;  // 4x4 board
  final int[] moves = {-BOARD_SIZE-1, -BOARD_SIZE, -BOARD_SIZE+1, 
                                  -1,                         +1,
                       +BOARD_SIZE-1, +BOARD_SIZE, +BOARD_SIZE+1};


  // Technically constant (calculated here for flexibility, but should be fixed)
  DictionaryEntry[] dictionary; // Processed word list
  int maxWordLength = 0;
  int[] boardTripletIndices; // List of all 3-letter moves in board coordinates

  DictionaryEntry[] buildDictionary(String fileName) throws IOException {
    BufferedReader fileReader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName));
    String word = fileReader.readLine();
    ArrayList<DictionaryEntry> result = new ArrayList<DictionaryEntry>();
    while (word!=null) {
      if (word.length()>=3) {
        word = word.toUpperCase();
        if (word.length()>maxWordLength) maxWordLength = word.length();
        DictionaryEntry entry = new DictionaryEntry();
        entry.letters  = new int[word.length()  ];
        entry.triplets = new int[word.length()-2];
        int i=0;
        for (char letter: word.toCharArray()) {
          entry.letters[i] = (byte) letter - 65; // Convert ASCII to 0..25
          if (i>=2)
            entry.triplets[i-2] = (((entry.letters[i-2]  << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                                     entry.letters[i-1]) << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                                     entry.letters[i];
          i++;
        }
        result.add(entry);
      }
      word = fileReader.readLine();
    }
    return result.toArray(new DictionaryEntry[result.size()]);
  }

  boolean isWrap(int a, int b) { // Checks if move a->b wraps board edge (like 3->4)
    return Math.abs(a%BOARD_SIZE-b%BOARD_SIZE)>1;
  }

  int[] buildTripletIndices() {
    ArrayList<Integer> result = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    for (int a=0; a<BOARD_SIZE*BOARD_SIZE; a++)
      for (int bm: moves) {
        int b=a+bm;
        if ((b>=0) && (b<board.length) && !isWrap(a, b))
          for (int cm: moves) {
            int c=b+cm;
            if ((c>=0) && (c<board.length) && (c!=a) && !isWrap(b, c)) {
              result.add(a);
              result.add(b);
              result.add(c);
            }
          }
      }
    int[] result2 = new int[result.size()];
    int i=0;
    for (Integer r: result) result2[i++] = r;
    return result2;
  }


  // Variables that depend on the actual game layout
  int[] board = new int[BOARD_SIZE*BOARD_SIZE]; // Letters in board
  boolean[] possibleTriplets = new boolean[1 << (ALPHABET_SIZE*3)];

  DictionaryEntry[] candidateWords;
  int candidateCount;

  int[] usedBoardPositions;

  DictionaryEntry[] foundWords;
  int foundCount;

  void initializeBoard(String[] letters) {
    for (int row=0; row<BOARD_SIZE; row++)
      for (int col=0; col<BOARD_SIZE; col++)
        board[row*BOARD_SIZE + col] = (byte) letters[row].charAt(col) - 65;
  }

  void setPossibleTriplets() {
    Arrays.fill(possibleTriplets, false); // Reset list
    int i=0;
    while (i<boardTripletIndices.length) {
      int triplet = (((board[boardTripletIndices[i++]]  << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                       board[boardTripletIndices[i++]]) << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                       board[boardTripletIndices[i++]];
      possibleTriplets[triplet] = true; 
    }
  }

  void checkWordTriplets() {
    candidateCount = 0;
    for (DictionaryEntry entry: dictionary) {
      boolean ok = true;
      int len = entry.triplets.length;
      for (int t=0; (t<len) && ok; t++)
        ok = possibleTriplets[entry.triplets[t]];
      if (ok) candidateWords[candidateCount++] = entry;
    }
  }

  void checkWords() { // Can probably be optimized a lot
    foundCount = 0;
    for (int i=0; i<candidateCount; i++) {
      DictionaryEntry candidate = candidateWords[i];
      for (int j=0; j<board.length; j++)
        if (board[j]==candidate.letters[0]) { 
          usedBoardPositions[0] = j;
          if (checkNextLetters(candidate, 1, j)) {
            foundWords[foundCount++] = candidate;
            break;
          }
        }
    }
  }

  boolean checkNextLetters(DictionaryEntry candidate, int letter, int pos) {
    if (letter==candidate.letters.length) return true;
    int match = candidate.letters[letter];
    for (int move: moves) {
      int next=pos+move;
      if ((next>=0) && (next<board.length) && (board[next]==match) && !isWrap(pos, next)) {
        boolean ok = true;
        for (int i=0; (i<letter) && ok; i++)
          ok = usedBoardPositions[i]!=next;
        if (ok) {
          usedBoardPositions[letter] = next;
          if (checkNextLetters(candidate, letter+1, next)) return true;
        }
      }
    }   
    return false;
  }


  // Just some helper functions
  String formatTime(long start, long end, long repetitions) {
    long time = (end-start)/repetitions;
    return time/1000000 + "." + (time/100000) % 10 + "" + (time/10000) % 10 + "ms";
  }

  String getWord(DictionaryEntry entry) {
    char[] result = new char[entry.letters.length];
    int i=0;
    for (int letter: entry.letters)
      result[i++] = (char) (letter+97);
    return new String(result);
  }

  void run() throws IOException {
    long start = System.nanoTime();

    // The following can be pre-computed and should be replaced by constants
    dictionary = buildDictionary("C:/TWL06.txt");
    boardTripletIndices = buildTripletIndices();
    long precomputed = System.nanoTime();


    // The following only needs to run once at the beginning of the program
    candidateWords     = new DictionaryEntry[dictionary.length]; // WAAAY too generous
    foundWords         = new DictionaryEntry[dictionary.length]; // WAAAY too generous
    usedBoardPositions = new int[maxWordLength];
    long initialized = System.nanoTime(); 

    for (int n=1; n<=100; n++) {
      // The following needs to run again for every new board
      initializeBoard(new String[] {"DGHI",
                                    "KLPS",
                                    "YEUT",
                                    "EORN"});
      setPossibleTriplets();
      checkWordTriplets();
      checkWords();
    }
    long solved = System.nanoTime();


    // Print out result and statistics
    System.out.println("Precomputation finished in " + formatTime(start, precomputed, 1)+":");
    System.out.println("  Words in the dictionary: "+dictionary.length);
    System.out.println("  Longest word:            "+maxWordLength+" letters");
    System.out.println("  Number of triplet-moves: "+boardTripletIndices.length/3);
    System.out.println();

    System.out.println("Initialization finished in " + formatTime(precomputed, initialized, 1));
    System.out.println();

    System.out.println("Board solved in "+formatTime(initialized, solved, 100)+":");
    System.out.println("  Number of candidates: "+candidateCount);
    System.out.println("  Number of actual words: "+foundCount);
    System.out.println();

    System.out.println("Words found:");
    int w=0;
    System.out.print("  ");
    for (int i=0; i<foundCount; i++) {
      System.out.print(getWord(foundWords[i]));
      w++;
      if (w==10) {
        w=0;
        System.out.println(); System.out.print("  ");
      } else
        if (i<foundCount-1) System.out.print(", ");
    }
    System.out.println();
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    new BoggleSolver().run();
  }
}

这里有一些结果：

对于原始问题中发布的图片中的网格（DGHI...）：

Precomputation finished in 239.59ms:
  Words in the dictionary: 178590
  Longest word:            15 letters
  Number of triplet-moves: 408

Initialization finished in 0.22ms

Board solved in 3.70ms:
  Number of candidates: 230
  Number of actual words: 163 

Words found:
  eek, eel, eely, eld, elhi, elk, ern, erupt, erupts, euro
  eye, eyer, ghi, ghis, glee, gley, glue, gluer, gluey, glut
  gluts, hip, hiply, hips, his, hist, kelp, kelps, kep, kepi
  kepis, keps, kept, kern, key, kye, lee, lek, lept, leu
  ley, lunt, lunts, lure, lush, lust, lustre, lye, nus, nut
  nuts, ore, ort, orts, ouph, ouphs, our, oust, out, outre
  outs, oyer, pee, per, pert, phi, phis, pis, pish, plus
  plush, ply, plyer, psi, pst, pul, pule, puler, pun, punt
  punts, pur, pure, puree, purely, pus, push, put, puts, ree
  rely, rep, reply, reps, roe, roue, roup, roups, roust, rout
  routs, rue, rule, ruly, run, runt, runts, rupee, rush, rust
  rut, ruts, ship, shlep, sip, sipe, spue, spun, spur, spurn
  spurt, strep, stroy, stun, stupe, sue, suer, sulk, sulker, sulky
  sun, sup, supe, super, sure, surely, tree, trek, trey, troupe
  troy, true, truly, tule, tun, tup, tups, turn, tush, ups
  urn, uts, yeld, yelk, yelp, yelps, yep, yeps, yore, you
  your, yourn, yous

对于作为原始问题中的示例发布的字母（FXIE ...）

Precomputation finished in 239.68ms:
  Words in the dictionary: 178590
  Longest word:            15 letters
  Number of triplet-moves: 408

Initialization finished in 0.21ms

Board solved in 3.69ms:
  Number of candidates: 87
  Number of actual words: 76

Words found:
  amble, ambo, ami, amie, asea, awa, awe, awes, awl, axil
  axile, axle, boil, bole, box, but, buts, east, elm, emboli
  fame, fames, fax, lei, lie, lima, limb, limbo, limbs, lime
  limes, lob, lobs, lox, mae, maes, maw, maws, max, maxi
  mesa, mew, mewl, mews, mil, mile, milo, mix, oil, ole
  sae, saw, sea, seam, semi, sew, stub, swam, swami, tub
  tubs, tux, twa, twae, twaes, twas, uts, wae, waes, wamble
  wame, wames, was, wast, wax, west

对于以下 5x5 网格：

R P R I T
A H H L N
I E T E P
Z R Y S G
O G W E Y

它给出了：

Precomputation finished in 240.39ms:
  Words in the dictionary: 178590
  Longest word:            15 letters
  Number of triplet-moves: 768

Initialization finished in 0.23ms

Board solved in 3.85ms:
  Number of candidates: 331
  Number of actual words: 240

Words found:
  aero, aery, ahi, air, airt, airth, airts, airy, ear, egest
  elhi, elint, erg, ergo, ester, eth, ether, eye, eyen, eyer
  eyes, eyre, eyrie, gel, gelt, gelts, gen, gent, gentil, gest
  geste, get, gets, gey, gor, gore, gory, grey, greyest, greys
  gyre, gyri, gyro, hae, haet, haets, hair, hairy, hap, harp
  heap, hear, heh, heir, help, helps, hen, hent, hep, her
  hero, hes, hest, het, hetero, heth, hets, hey, hie, hilt
  hilts, hin, hint, hire, hit, inlet, inlets, ire, leg, leges
  legs, lehr, lent, les, lest, let, lethe, lets, ley, leys
  lin, line, lines, liney, lint, lit, neg, negs, nest, nester
  net, nether, nets, nil, nit, ogre, ore, orgy, ort, orts
  pah, pair, par, peg, pegs, peh, pelt, pelter, peltry, pelts
  pen, pent, pes, pest, pester, pesty, pet, peter, pets, phi
  philter, philtre, phiz, pht, print, pst, rah, rai, rap, raphe
  raphes, reap, rear, rei, ret, rete, rets, rhaphe, rhaphes, rhea
  ria, rile, riles, riley, rin, rye, ryes, seg, sel, sen
  sent, senti, set, sew, spelt, spelter, spent, splent, spline, splint
  split, stent, step, stey, stria, striae, sty, stye, tea, tear
  teg, tegs, tel, ten, tent, thae, the, their, then, these
  thesp, they, thin, thine, thir, thirl, til, tile, tiles, tilt
  tilter, tilth, tilts, tin, tine, tines, tirl, trey, treys, trog
  try, tye, tyer, tyes, tyre, tyro, west, wester, wry, wryest
  wye, wyes, wyte, wytes, yea, yeah, year, yeh, yelp, yelps
  yen, yep, yeps, yes, yester, yet, yew, yews, zero, zori

为此，我使用了 TWL06 锦标赛拼字游戏单词列表，因为原始问题中的链接不再有效。 这个文件有 1.85MB，所以有点短。 buildDictionary 函数会丢弃所有少于 3 个字母的单词。

以下是对此性能的一些观察：

• 它比 Victor Nicollet 的 OCaml 实现的报告性能慢大约 10 倍。 这是否是由于算法不同、他使用的字典较短、他的代码是在 Java 虚拟机中编译而我的代码运行这一事实，还是我们计算机的性能（我的是运行 WinXP 的 Intel Q6600 @ 2.4MHz）引起的，我不知道。 但它比原始问题末尾引用的其他实现的结果要快得多。 所以，这个算法是否优于 trie 字典，我现在还不知道。

• checkWordTriplets() 中使用的表格方法可以很好地近似实际答案。 通过的 3-5 个单词中只有 1 个将无法通过 checkWords() 测试（参见上面的候选数与实际单词数 )。

• 上面你看不到的东西：checkWordTriplets() 函数大约需要 3.65 毫秒，因此在搜索过程中完全占主导地位。 checkWords() 函数几乎占用了剩余的 0.05-0.20 毫秒。

• 与字典大小线性相关，并且实际上与板大小无关！

• checkWords() 的执行时间取决于checkWordTriplets() 不排除棋盘大小和单词数。

• 上面的 checkWords() 实现是我想出的最愚蠢的第一个版本。 基本上根本就没有优化。 但与 checkWordTriplets() 相比，它与应用程序的总体性能无关，所以我并不担心它。 但是，如果电路板尺寸变大，这个函数会变得越来越慢，最终会变得很重要。 然后，它还需要优化。

• 此代码的一个优点是它的灵活性：

  • 您可以轻松更改板大小：更新第 10 行和传递给 initializeBoard() 的字符串数组。
  • 它可以支持更大/不同的字母表，并且可以处理诸如将“Qu”视为一个字母之类的事情，而无需任何性能开销。 为此，需要更新第 9 行以及将字符转换为数字的几个位置（目前只需从 ASCII 值中减去 65）

好吧，但我认为到目前为止这篇文章已经足够长了。 我绝对可以回答您可能提出的任何问题，但让我们将其转移到评论中。

Answer 7

令人惊讶的是，没有人尝试过它的 PHP 版本。

这是 John Fouhy 的 Python 解决方案的 PHP 版本。

虽然我从其他人的答案中得到了一些指导，但这大部分是从约翰那里复制的。

$boggle = "fxie
           amlo
           ewbx
           astu";

$alphabet = str_split(str_replace(array("\n", " ", "\r"), "", strtolower($boggle)));
$rows = array_map('trim', explode("\n", $boggle));
$dictionary = file("C:/dict.txt");
$prefixes = array(''=>'');
$words = array();
$regex = '/[' . implode('', $alphabet) . ']{3,}$/S';
foreach($dictionary as $k=>$value) {
    $value = trim(strtolower($value));
    $length = strlen($value);
    if(preg_match($regex, $value)) {
        for($x = 0; $x < $length; $x++) {
            $letter = substr($value, 0, $x+1);
            if($letter == $value) {
                $words[$value] = 1;
            } else {
                $prefixes[$letter] = 1;
            }
        }
    }
}

$graph = array();
$chardict = array();
$positions = array();
$c = count($rows);
for($i = 0; $i < $c; $i++) {
    $l = strlen($rows[$i]);
    for($j = 0; $j < $l; $j++) {
        $chardict[$i.','.$j] = $rows[$i][$j];
        $children = array();
        $pos = array(-1,0,1);
        foreach($pos as $z) {
            $xCoord = $z + $i;
            if($xCoord < 0 || $xCoord >= count($rows)) {
                continue;
            }
            $len = strlen($rows[0]);
            foreach($pos as $w) {
                $yCoord = $j + $w;
                if(($yCoord < 0 || $yCoord >= $len) || ($z == 0 && $w == 0)) {
                    continue;
                }
                $children[] = array($xCoord, $yCoord);
            }
        }
        $graph['None'][] = array($i, $j);
        $graph[$i.','.$j] = $children;
    }
}

function to_word($chardict, $prefix) {
    $word = array();
    foreach($prefix as $v) {
        $word[] = $chardict[$v[0].','.$v[1]];
    }
    return implode("", $word);
}

function find_words($graph, $chardict, $position, $prefix, $prefixes, &$results, $words) {
    $word = to_word($chardict, $prefix);
    if(!isset($prefixes[$word])) return false;

    if(isset($words[$word])) {
        $results[] = $word;
    }

    foreach($graph[$position] as $child) {
        if(!in_array($child, $prefix)) {
            $newprefix = $prefix;
            $newprefix[] = $child;
            find_words($graph, $chardict, $child[0].','.$child[1], $newprefix, $prefixes, $results, $words);
        }
    }
}

$solution = array();
find_words($graph, $chardict, 'None', array(), $prefixes, $solution);
print_r($solution);

如果您想尝试一下，这里有一个实时链接。 虽然在我的本地计算机上需要约 2 秒，但在我的网络服务器上需要约 5 秒。 无论哪种情况，它都不是很快。 尽管如此，它还是相当可怕，所以我可以想象时间可以大大减少。 任何有关如何实现这一目标的指示将不胜感激。 PHP 缺乏元组使得坐标使用起来很奇怪，而且我无法理解到底发生了什么，这根本没有帮助。

编辑：一些修复使其在本地花费的时间不到 1 秒。

Answer 8

对 VB 不感兴趣？ :) 我无法抗拒。 我解决这个问题的方法与这里提出的许多解决方案不同。

我的时间是：

• 将字典和单词前缀加载到哈希表中：0.5 到 1 秒。
• 查找单词：平均不到 10 毫秒。

编辑：Web 主机服务器上的字典加载时间比我的家用计算机长大约 1 到 1.5 秒。

我不知道随着服务器负载的增加，时间会恶化到什么程度。

我在 .Net 中将解决方案编写为网页。 myvrad.com/boggle

我正在使用原始问题中引用的字典。

字母不会在单词中重复使用。 仅找到 3 个字符或更长的单词。

我使用所有唯一单词前缀和单词的哈希表而不是特里树。 我不了解 trie，所以我在那里学到了一些东西。 除了完整的单词之外，还创建单词前缀列表的想法最终使我的时间减少到了可观的数字。

阅读代码注释以获取更多详细信息。

这是代码：

Imports System.Collections.Generic
Imports System.IO

Partial Class boggle_Default

    'Bob Archer, 4/15/2009

    'To avoid using a 2 dimensional array in VB I'm not using typical X,Y
    'coordinate iteration to find paths.
    '
    'I have locked the code into a 4 by 4 grid laid out like so:
    ' abcd
    ' efgh
    ' ijkl
    ' mnop
    ' 
    'To find paths the code starts with a letter from a to p then
    'explores the paths available around it. If a neighboring letter
    'already exists in the path then we don't go there.
    '
    'Neighboring letters (grid points) are hard coded into
    'a Generic.Dictionary below.



    'Paths is a list of only valid Paths found. 
    'If a word prefix or word is not found the path is not
    'added and extending that path is terminated.
    Dim Paths As New Generic.List(Of String)

    'NeighborsOf. The keys are the letters a to p.
    'The value is a string of letters representing neighboring letters.
    'The string of neighboring letters is split and iterated later.
    Dim NeigborsOf As New Generic.Dictionary(Of String, String)

    'BoggleLetters. The keys are mapped to the lettered grid of a to p.
    'The values are what the user inputs on the page.
    Dim BoggleLetters As New Generic.Dictionary(Of String, String)

    'Used to store last postition of path. This will be a letter
    'from a to p.
    Dim LastPositionOfPath As String = ""

    'I found a HashTable was by far faster than a Generic.Dictionary 
    ' - about 10 times faster. This stores prefixes of words and words.
    'I determined 792773 was the number of words and unique prefixes that
    'will be generated from the dictionary file. This is a max number and
    'the final hashtable will not have that many.
    Dim HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords As New Hashtable(792773)

    'Stores words that are found.
    Dim FoundWords As New Generic.List(Of String)

    'Just to validate what the user enters in the grid.
    Dim ErrorFoundWithSubmittedLetters As Boolean = False

    Public Sub BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords(ByVal ThisPath As String)
        'Word is the word correlating to the ThisPath parameter.
        'This path would be a series of letters from a to p.
        Dim Word As String = ""

        'The path is iterated through and a word based on the actual
        'letters in the Boggle grid is assembled.
        For i As Integer = 0 To ThisPath.Length - 1
            Word += Me.BoggleLetters(ThisPath.Substring(i, 1))
        Next

        'If my hashtable of word prefixes and words doesn't contain this Word
        'Then this isn't a word and any further extension of ThisPath will not
        'yield any words either. So exit sub to terminate exploring this path.
        If Not HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords.ContainsKey(Word) Then Exit Sub

        'The value of my hashtable is a boolean representing if the key if a word (true) or
        'just a prefix (false). If true and at least 3 letters long then yay! word found.
        If HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords(Word) AndAlso Word.Length > 2 Then Me.FoundWords.Add(Word)

        'If my List of Paths doesn't contain ThisPath then add it.
        'Remember only valid paths will make it this far. Paths not found
        'in the HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords cause this sub to exit above.
        If Not Paths.Contains(ThisPath) Then Paths.Add(ThisPath)

        'Examine the last letter of ThisPath. We are looking to extend the path
        'to our neighboring letters if any are still available.
        LastPositionOfPath = ThisPath.Substring(ThisPath.Length - 1, 1)

        'Loop through my list of neighboring letters (representing grid points).
        For Each Neighbor As String In Me.NeigborsOf(LastPositionOfPath).ToCharArray()
            'If I find a neighboring grid point that I haven't already used
            'in ThisPath then extend ThisPath and feed the new path into
            'this recursive function. (see recursive.)
            If Not ThisPath.Contains(Neighbor) Then Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords(ThisPath & Neighbor)
        Next
    End Sub

    Protected Sub ButtonBoggle_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles ButtonBoggle.Click

        'User has entered the 16 letters and clicked the go button.

        'Set up my Generic.Dictionary of grid points, I'm using letters a to p -
        'not an x,y grid system.  The values are neighboring points.
        NeigborsOf.Add("a", "bfe")
        NeigborsOf.Add("b", "cgfea")
        NeigborsOf.Add("c", "dhgfb")
        NeigborsOf.Add("d", "hgc")
        NeigborsOf.Add("e", "abfji")
        NeigborsOf.Add("f", "abcgkjie")
        NeigborsOf.Add("g", "bcdhlkjf")
        NeigborsOf.Add("h", "cdlkg")
        NeigborsOf.Add("i", "efjnm")
        NeigborsOf.Add("j", "efgkonmi")
        NeigborsOf.Add("k", "fghlponj")
        NeigborsOf.Add("l", "ghpok")
        NeigborsOf.Add("m", "ijn")
        NeigborsOf.Add("n", "ijkom")
        NeigborsOf.Add("o", "jklpn")
        NeigborsOf.Add("p", "klo")

        'Retrieve letters the user entered.
        BoggleLetters.Add("a", Me.TextBox1.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("b", Me.TextBox2.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("c", Me.TextBox3.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("d", Me.TextBox4.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("e", Me.TextBox5.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("f", Me.TextBox6.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("g", Me.TextBox7.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("h", Me.TextBox8.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("i", Me.TextBox9.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("j", Me.TextBox10.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("k", Me.TextBox11.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("l", Me.TextBox12.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("m", Me.TextBox13.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("n", Me.TextBox14.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("o", Me.TextBox15.Text.ToLower.Trim())
        BoggleLetters.Add("p", Me.TextBox16.Text.ToLower.Trim())

        'Validate user entered something with a length of 1 for all 16 textboxes.
        For Each S As String In BoggleLetters.Keys
            If BoggleLetters(S).Length <> 1 Then
                ErrorFoundWithSubmittedLetters = True
                Exit For
            End If
        Next

        'If input is not valid then...
        If ErrorFoundWithSubmittedLetters Then
            'Present error message.
        Else
            'Else assume we have 16 letters to work with and start finding words.
            Dim SB As New StringBuilder

            Dim Time As String = String.Format("{0}:{1}:{2}:{3}", Date.Now.Hour.ToString(), Date.Now.Minute.ToString(), Date.Now.Second.ToString(), Date.Now.Millisecond.ToString())

            Dim NumOfLetters As Integer = 0
            Dim Word As String = ""
            Dim TempWord As String = ""
            Dim Letter As String = ""
            Dim fr As StreamReader = Nothing
            fr = New System.IO.StreamReader(HttpContext.Current.Request.MapPath("~/boggle/dic.txt"))

            'First fill my hashtable with word prefixes and words.
            'HashTable(PrefixOrWordString, BooleanTrueIfWordFalseIfPrefix)
            While fr.Peek <> -1
                Word = fr.ReadLine.Trim()
                TempWord = ""
                For i As Integer = 0 To Word.Length - 1
                    Letter = Word.Substring(i, 1)
                    'This optimization helped quite a bit. Words in the dictionary that begin
                    'with letters that the user did not enter in the grid shouldn't go in my hashtable.
                    '
                    'I realize most of the solutions went with a Trie. I'd never heard of that before,
                    'which is one of the neat things about SO, seeing how others approach challenges
                    'and learning some best practices.
                    '
                    'However, I didn't code a Trie in my solution. I just have a hashtable with 
                    'all words in the dicitonary file and all possible prefixes for those words.
                    'A Trie might be faster but I'm not coding it now. I'm getting good times with this.
                    If i = 0 AndAlso Not BoggleLetters.ContainsValue(Letter) Then Continue While
                    TempWord += Letter
                    If Not HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords.ContainsKey(TempWord) Then
                        HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords.Add(TempWord, TempWord = Word)
                    End If
                Next
            End While

            SB.Append("Number of Word Prefixes and Words in Hashtable: " & HashTableOfPrefixesAndWords.Count.ToString())
            SB.Append("<br />")

            SB.Append("Loading Dictionary: " & Time & " - " & String.Format("{0}:{1}:{2}:{3}", Date.Now.Hour.ToString(), Date.Now.Minute.ToString(), Date.Now.Second.ToString(), Date.Now.Millisecond.ToString()))
            SB.Append("<br />")

            Time = String.Format("{0}:{1}:{2}:{3}", Date.Now.Hour.ToString(), Date.Now.Minute.ToString(), Date.Now.Second.ToString(), Date.Now.Millisecond.ToString())

            'This starts a path at each point on the grid an builds a path until 
            'the string of letters correlating to the path is not found in the hashtable
            'of word prefixes and words.
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("a")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("b")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("c")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("d")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("e")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("f")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("g")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("h")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("i")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("j")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("k")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("l")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("m")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("n")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("o")
            Me.BuildAndTestPathsAndFindWords("p")

            SB.Append("Finding Words: " & Time & " - " & String.Format("{0}:{1}:{2}:{3}", Date.Now.Hour.ToString(), Date.Now.Minute.ToString(), Date.Now.Second.ToString(), Date.Now.Millisecond.ToString()))
            SB.Append("<br />")

            SB.Append("Num of words found: " & FoundWords.Count.ToString())
            SB.Append("<br />")
            SB.Append("<br />")

            FoundWords.Sort()
            SB.Append(String.Join("<br />", FoundWords.ToArray()))

            'Output results.
            Me.LiteralBoggleResults.Text = SB.ToString()
            Me.PanelBoggleResults.Visible = True

        End If

    End Sub

End Class

Answer 9

我一看到问题陈述，就想到了“Trie”。 但看到其他几张海报也使用了这种方法，我寻找另一种方法来与众不同。 唉，Trie 方法表现得更好。 我在我的机器上运行 Kent 的 Perl 解决方案，在调整它以使用我的字典文件后，运行时间为 0.31 秒。 我自己的 Perl 实现需要 0.54 秒才能运行。

这是我的方法：

1. 创建一个转换哈希来建模合法转换。

2. 迭代所有 16^3 种可能的三字母组合。

   • 在循环中，排除非法转换和重复访问
     同一个正方形。 形成所有合法的 3 字母序列并将它们存储在哈希中。

3. 然后循环遍历字典中的所有单词。

   • 排除太长或太短的单词
   • 在每个单词上滑动一个 3 字母窗口，看看它是否属于第 2 步中的 3 字母组合。排除失败的单词。 这消除了大多数不匹配的情况。
   • 如果仍未消除，请使用递归算法来查看是否可以通过在拼图中创建路径来形成单词。 （这部分很慢，但很少被调用。）

4. 打印出我找到的单词。

   我尝试了 3 个字母和 4 个字母的序列，但 4 个字母的序列减慢了程序的速度。

在我的代码中，我使用 /usr/share/dict/words 作为我的字典。 它是 MAC OS X 和许多 Unix 系统的标准配置。 如果需要，您可以使用另一个文件。 要破解不同的谜题，只需更改变量@puzzle。 这很容易适应更大的矩阵。 您只需要更改 %transitions 哈希和 %legalTransitions 哈希。

这个解决方案的优点是代码短，数据结构简单。

这是 Perl 代码（我知道它使用了太多全局变量）：

#!/usr/bin/perl
use Time::HiRes  qw{ time };

sub readFile($);
sub findAllPrefixes($);
sub isWordTraceable($);
sub findWordsInPuzzle(@);

my $startTime = time;

# Puzzle to solve

my @puzzle = ( 
    F, X, I, E,
    A, M, L, O,
    E, W, B, X,
    A, S, T, U
);

my $minimumWordLength = 3;
my $maximumPrefixLength = 3; # I tried four and it slowed down.

# Slurp the word list.
my $wordlistFile = "/usr/share/dict/words";

my @words = split(/\n/, uc(readFile($wordlistFile)));
print "Words loaded from word list: " . scalar @words . "\n";

print "Word file load time: " . (time - $startTime) . "\n";
my $postLoad = time;

# Define the legal transitions from one letter position to another. 
# Positions are numbered 0-15.
#     0  1  2  3
#     4  5  6  7
#     8  9 10 11
#    12 13 14 15
my %transitions = ( 
   -1 => [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15],
    0 => [1,4,5], 
    1 => [0,2,4,5,6],
    2 => [1,3,5,6,7],
    3 => [2,6,7],
    4 => [0,1,5,8,9],
    5 => [0,1,2,4,6,8,9,10],
    6 => [1,2,3,5,7,9,10,11],
    7 => [2,3,6,10,11],
    8 => [4,5,9,12,13],
    9 => [4,5,6,8,10,12,13,14],
    10 => [5,6,7,9,11,13,14,15],
    11 => [6,7,10,14,15],
    12 => [8,9,13],
    13 => [8,9,10,12,14],
    14 => [9,10,11,13,15],
    15 => [10,11,14]
);

# Convert the transition matrix into a hash for easy access.
my %legalTransitions = ();
foreach my $start (keys %transitions) {
    my $legalRef = $transitions{$start};
    foreach my $stop (@$legalRef) {
        my $index = ($start + 1) * (scalar @puzzle) + ($stop + 1);
        $legalTransitions{$index} = 1;
    }
}

my %prefixesInPuzzle = findAllPrefixes($maximumPrefixLength);

print "Find prefixes time: " . (time - $postLoad) . "\n";
my $postPrefix = time;

my @wordsFoundInPuzzle = findWordsInPuzzle(@words);

print "Find words in puzzle time: " . (time - $postPrefix) . "\n";

print "Unique prefixes found: " . (scalar keys %prefixesInPuzzle) . "\n";
print "Words found (" . (scalar @wordsFoundInPuzzle) . ") :\n    " . join("\n    ", @wordsFoundInPuzzle) . "\n";

print "Total Elapsed time: " . (time - $startTime) . "\n";

###########################################

sub readFile($) {
    my ($filename) = @_;
    my $contents;
    if (-e $filename) {
        # This is magic: it opens and reads a file into a scalar in one line of code. 
        # See http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2003/11/21/slurp.html
        $contents = do { local( @ARGV, $/ ) = $filename ; <> } ; 
    }
    else {
        $contents = '';
    }
    return $contents;
}

# Is it legal to move from the first position to the second? They must be adjacent.
sub isLegalTransition($) {
    my ($pos1,$pos2) = @_;
    my $index = ($pos1 + 1) * (scalar @puzzle) + ($pos2 + 1);
    return $legalTransitions{$index};
}

# Find all prefixes where $minimumWordLength <= length <= $maxPrefixLength
#
#   $maxPrefixLength ... Maximum length of prefix we will store. Three gives best performance. 
sub findAllPrefixes($) {
    my ($maxPrefixLength) = @_;
    my %prefixes = ();
    my $puzzleSize = scalar @puzzle;

    # Every possible N-letter combination of the letters in the puzzle 
    # can be represented as an integer, though many of those combinations
    # involve illegal transitions, duplicated letters, etc.
    # Iterate through all those possibilities and eliminate the illegal ones.
    my $maxIndex = $puzzleSize ** $maxPrefixLength;

    for (my $i = 0; $i < $maxIndex; $i++) {
        my @path;
        my $remainder = $i;
        my $prevPosition = -1;
        my $prefix = '';
        my %usedPositions = ();
        for (my $prefixLength = 1; $prefixLength <= $maxPrefixLength; $prefixLength++) {
            my $position = $remainder % $puzzleSize;

            # Is this a valid step?
            #  a. Is the transition legal (to an adjacent square)?
            if (! isLegalTransition($prevPosition, $position)) {
                last;
            }

            #  b. Have we repeated a square?
            if ($usedPositions{$position}) {
                last;
            }
            else {
                $usedPositions{$position} = 1;
            }

            # Record this prefix if length >= $minimumWordLength.
            $prefix .= $puzzle[$position];
            if ($prefixLength >= $minimumWordLength) {
                $prefixes{$prefix} = 1;
            }

            push @path, $position;
            $remainder -= $position;
            $remainder /= $puzzleSize;
            $prevPosition = $position;
        } # end inner for
    } # end outer for
    return %prefixes;
}

# Loop through all words in dictionary, looking for ones that are in the puzzle.
sub findWordsInPuzzle(@) {
    my @allWords = @_;
    my @wordsFound = ();
    my $puzzleSize = scalar @puzzle;
WORD: foreach my $word (@allWords) {
        my $wordLength = length($word);
        if ($wordLength > $puzzleSize || $wordLength < $minimumWordLength) {
            # Reject word as too short or too long.
        }
        elsif ($wordLength <= $maximumPrefixLength ) {
            # Word should be in the prefix hash.
            if ($prefixesInPuzzle{$word}) {
                push @wordsFound, $word;
            }
        }
        else {
            # Scan through the word using a window of length $maximumPrefixLength, looking for any strings not in our prefix list.
            # If any are found that are not in the list, this word is not possible.
            # If no non-matches are found, we have more work to do.
            my $limit = $wordLength - $maximumPrefixLength + 1;
            for (my $startIndex = 0; $startIndex < $limit; $startIndex ++) {
                if (! $prefixesInPuzzle{substr($word, $startIndex, $maximumPrefixLength)}) {
                    next WORD;
                }
            }
            if (isWordTraceable($word)) {
                # Additional test necessary: see if we can form this word by following legal transitions
                push @wordsFound, $word;
            }
        }

    }
    return @wordsFound;
}

# Is it possible to trace out the word using only legal transitions?
sub isWordTraceable($) {
    my $word = shift;
    return traverse([split(//, $word)], [-1]); # Start at special square -1, which may transition to any square in the puzzle.
}

# Recursively look for a path through the puzzle that matches the word.
sub traverse($) {
    my ($lettersRef, $pathRef) = @_;
    my $index = scalar @$pathRef - 1;
    my $position = $pathRef->[$index];
    my $letter = $lettersRef->[$index];
    my $branchesRef =  $transitions{$position};
BRANCH: foreach my $branch (@$branchesRef) {
            if ($puzzle[$branch] eq $letter) {
                # Have we used this position yet?
                foreach my $usedBranch (@$pathRef) {
                    if ($usedBranch == $branch) {
                        next BRANCH;
                    }
                }
                if (scalar @$lettersRef == $index + 1) {
                    return 1; # End of word and success.
                }
                push @$pathRef, $branch;
                if (traverse($lettersRef, $pathRef)) {
                    return 1; # Recursive success.
                }
                else {
                    pop @$pathRef;
                }
            }
        }
    return 0; # No path found. Failed.
}

Answer 10

我知道我太晚了，但我不久前用 PHP 做了其中一个 - 也只是为了好玩......

http://www.lostsockdesign.com.au/sandbox/boggle/index.php?letters=fxieamloewbxastu
在 0.90108 秒 内找到 75 个单词（133 分）

F.........X..I.........E。 ............
是.......... …………L………………O ......................................
………………………………W……………… B........................X
作为.............................. ...................T.................U....

给出一些指示程序实际执行的操作 - 每个字母都是它开始查找模式的地方，而每个“.” 显示它尝试采取的路径。 越多的“.” 它已经进一步搜索了。

如果您想要代码，请告诉我...这是 PHP 和 HTML 的可怕组合，从未想过要公开，所以我不敢将其发布在这里 :P

Answer 11

我花了 3 个月的时间研究 10 个最佳点密集 5x5 Boggle 板问题的解决方案。

该问题现已解决，并在 5 个网页上进行了全面披露。 有问题请联系我。

棋盘分析算法使用显式堆栈通过具有直接子信息和时间戳跟踪机制的有向非循环字图来伪递归地遍历棋盘方块。 这很可能是世界上最先进的词典数据结构。

该方案每秒在四核上评估约 10,000 个非常好的主板。 （9500+ 点）

父网页：

DeepSearch.c - http://www.pathcom.com /~vadco/deep.html

组件网页：

最佳记分板 - http:// www.pathcom.com/~vadco/binary.html

高级词典结构 - http: //www.pathcom.com/~vadco/adtdawg.html

董事会分析算法 - http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/guns.html

并行批处理 - http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/parallel.html

-
这种全面的工作只会让那些要求最好的人感兴趣。

Answer 12

随着搜索的继续，您的搜索算法是否会不断减少单词列表？

例如，在上面的搜索中，您的单词只能以 13 个字母开头（有效地减少了一半的起始字母）。

当您添加更多字母排列时，可用的单词集将进一步减少，从而减少必要的搜索。

我会从那里开始。

Answer 13

我必须更多地考虑一个完整的解决方案，但作为一种方便的优化，我想知道是否值得根据所有字典中的单词，并使用它来确定搜索的优先顺序。 我会选择单词的开头字母。 因此，如果您的字典包含单词“India”、“Water”、“Extreme”和“Extraordinary”，那么您预先计算的表可能是：

'IN': 1
'WA': 1
'EX': 2

然后按照共性的顺序搜索这些二元组（首先是 EX，然后是 WA/在）

Answer 14

首先，了解一位 C# 语言设计者如何解决相关问题：
http: //blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2009/02/04/a-nasality-talisman-for-the-sultana-analyst.aspx。

像他一样，您可以从字典开始，然后通过从按字母顺序排序的字母数组创建字典到可以从这些字母拼写的单词列表来创建字典，从而规范化单词。

接下来，开始从黑板上创建可能的单词并查找它们。 我怀疑这会让你走得更远，但肯定还有更多的技巧可以加快速度。

Answer 15

我建议根据单词制作一棵字母树。 该树将由字母结构组成，如下所示：

letter: char
isWord: boolean

然后构建树，每个深度添加一个新字母。 换句话说，第一层是字母表；第二层是字母。 然后，每棵树中都会有另外 26 个条目，依此类推，直到您拼出所有单词。 坚持这个解析树，它将使所有可能的答案更快地查找。

通过这个解析树，您可以非常快速地找到解决方案。 这是伪代码：

BEGIN: 
    For each letter:
        if the struct representing it on the current depth has isWord == true, enter it as an answer.
        Cycle through all its neighbors; if there is a child of the current node corresponding to the letter, recursively call BEGIN on it.

这可以通过一些动态编程来加速。 例如，在您的示例中，两个“A”都位于“E”和“W”旁边，这（从它们击中的那一刻起）将是相同的。 我没有足够的时间来真正详细说明此代码，但我认为您可以理解这个想法。

另外，我相信如果您在 Google 上搜索“Bogglesolver”，您会找到其他解决方案。

Answer 16

只是为了好玩，我在 bash 中实现了一个。
它不是超级快，但合理。

http://dev.xkyle.com/bashboggle/

Answer 17

搞笑。 几天前，由于同一个该死的游戏，我几乎发布了同样的问题！ 然而我没有，因为只是在谷歌上搜索了 令人难以置信的求解器 python 并得到了我想要的所有答案。

Answer 18

我意识到这个问题的时间已经过去了，但由于我自己正在研究一个求解器，并且在谷歌搜索时偶然发现了这个问题，我认为我应该发布对我的参考，因为它似乎与其他一些问题有点不同。

我选择为游戏板使用平面数组，并从板上的每个字母进行递归搜索，从有效邻居遍历到有效邻居，如果索引中存在有效前缀则扩展当前字母列表的搜索。 在遍历当前单词的概念时，它是董事会中的索引列表，而不是组成单词的字母。 检查索引时，索引被转换为字母并完成检查。

该索引是一个强力字典，有点像 trie，但允许对索引进行 Pythonic 查询。 如果单词“cat”和“cater”在列表中，您将在字典中得到以下内容：

   d = { 'c': ['cat','cater'],
     'ca': ['cat','cater'],
     'cat': ['cat','cater'],
     'cate': ['cater'],
     'cater': ['cater'],
   }

因此，如果 current_word 是“ca”，您就知道它是一个有效的前缀，因为 d< 中的 'ca' /code> 返回 True（因此继续遍历棋盘）。 如果 current_word 是“cat”，那么您就知道它是一个有效的单词，因为它是一个有效的前缀，并且 d['cat'] 中的 'cat' 也返回 True。

如果感觉这允许一些可读的代码看起来并不太慢。 与其他系统一样，该系统的开销是读取/构建索引。 解决棋盘问题几乎是噪音。

代码位于 http://gist.github.com/268079。 它故意是垂直的和天真的，有很多明确的有效性检查，因为我想理解这个问题，而不是用一堆魔法或晦涩难懂的东西来破坏它。

Answer 19

我用 C++ 编写了求解器。 我实现了自定义树结构。 我不确定它是否可以被视为特里树，但它很相似。 每个节点有 26 个分支，每个分支对应字母表中的一个字母。 我与字典的分支平行地遍历了滑板的分支。 如果字典中不存在该分支，我将停止在 Boggle 板上搜索它。 我将板上的所有字母都转换为整数。 所以 'A' = 0。由于它只是数组，因此查找始终为 O(1)。 每个节点存储它是否完成一个单词以及其子节点中存在多少个单词。 当发现单词时，树就会被修剪，以减少重复搜索相同的单词。 我相信剪枝也是 O(1)。

CPU：奔腾SU2700 1.3GHz
RAM：3GB

加载 << 中的 178,590 个单词的词典 1秒。
在 4 秒内解决 100x100 Boggle (boggle.txt)。 找到约 44,000 个单词。
解决 4x4 Boggle 问题的速度太快，无法提供有意义的基准。 :)

快速 Boggle 求解器 GitHub 存储库

Answer 20

给定一个具有 N 行和 M 列的 Boggle 板，我们假设如下：

• N*M 远大于可能的单词数量
• N*M 远大于最长的可能单词

在这些假设下，该解决方案的复杂度为 O （N*M）。

我认为在很多方面比较这个示例板的运行时间都没有抓住重点，但为了完整起见，该解决方案在我的现代 MacBook Pro 上的运行时间小于 0.2 秒。

该解决方案将为语料库中的每个单词找到所有可能的路径。

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# Example usage: ./boggle-solver --board "fxie amlo ewbx astu"

autoload :Matrix, 'matrix'
autoload :OptionParser, 'optparse'

DEFAULT_CORPUS_PATH = '/usr/share/dict/words'.freeze

# Functions

def filter_corpus(matrix, corpus, min_word_length)
  board_char_counts = Hash.new(0)
  matrix.each { |c| board_char_counts[c] += 1 }

  max_word_length = matrix.row_count * matrix.column_count
  boggleable_regex = /^[#{board_char_counts.keys.reduce(:+)}]{#{min_word_length},#{max_word_length}}$/
  corpus.select{ |w| w.match boggleable_regex }.select do |w|
    word_char_counts = Hash.new(0)
    w.each_char { |c| word_char_counts[c] += 1 }
    word_char_counts.all? { |c, count| board_char_counts[c] >= count }
  end
end

def neighbors(point, matrix)
  i, j = point
  ([i-1, 0].max .. [i+1, matrix.row_count-1].min).inject([]) do |r, new_i|
    ([j-1, 0].max .. [j+1, matrix.column_count-1].min).inject(r) do |r, new_j|
      neighbor = [new_i, new_j]
      neighbor.eql?(point) ? r : r << neighbor
    end
  end
end

def expand_path(path, word, matrix)
  return [path] if path.length == word.length

  next_char = word[path.length]
  viable_neighbors = neighbors(path[-1], matrix).select do |point|
    !path.include?(point) && matrix.element(*point).eql?(next_char)
  end

  viable_neighbors.inject([]) do |result, point|
    result + expand_path(path.dup << point, word, matrix)
  end
end

def find_paths(word, matrix)
  result = []
  matrix.each_with_index do |c, i, j|
    result += expand_path([[i, j]], word, matrix) if c.eql?(word[0])
  end
  result
end

def solve(matrix, corpus, min_word_length: 3)
  boggleable_corpus = filter_corpus(matrix, corpus, min_word_length)
  boggleable_corpus.inject({}) do |result, w|
    paths = find_paths(w, matrix)
    result[w] = paths unless paths.empty?
    result
  end
end

# Script

options = { corpus_path: DEFAULT_CORPUS_PATH }
option_parser = OptionParser.new do |opts|
  opts.banner = 'Usage: boggle-solver --board <value> [--corpus <value>]'

  opts.on('--board BOARD', String, 'The board (e.g. "fxi aml ewb ast")') do |b|
    options[:board] = b
  end

  opts.on('--corpus CORPUS_PATH', String, 'Corpus file path') do |c|
    options[:corpus_path] = c
  end

  opts.on_tail('-h', '--help', 'Shows usage') do
    STDOUT.puts opts
    exit
  end
end
option_parser.parse!

unless options[:board]
  STDERR.puts option_parser
  exit false
end

unless File.file? options[:corpus_path]
  STDERR.puts "No corpus exists - #{options[:corpus_path]}"
  exit false
end

rows = options[:board].downcase.scan(/\S+/).map{ |row| row.scan(/./) }

raw_corpus = File.readlines(options[:corpus_path])
corpus = raw_corpus.map{ |w| w.downcase.rstrip }.uniq.sort

solution = solve(Matrix.rows(rows), corpus)
solution.each_pair do |w, paths|
  STDOUT.puts w
  paths.each do |path|
    STDOUT.puts "\t" + path.map{ |point| point.inspect }.join(', ')
  end
end
STDOUT.puts "TOTAL: #{solution.count}"

Answer 21

该解决方案还给出了在给定板中搜索的方向

算法：

1. Uses trie to save all the word in the english to fasten the search
2. The uses DFS to search the words in Boggle

输出：

Found "pic" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → →
Found "pick" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑
Found "pickman" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↑ ↖ ↑
Found "picket" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↗ ↖
Found "picked" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↗ ↘
Found "pickle" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↘ →

代码：

from collections import defaultdict
from nltk.corpus import words
from nltk.corpus import stopwords
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize

english_words = words.words()

# If you wan to remove stop words
# stop_words = set(stopwords.words('english'))
# english_words = [w for w in english_words if w not in stop_words]

boggle = [
    ['c', 'n', 't', 's', 's'],
    ['d', 'a', 't', 'i', 'n'],
    ['o', 'o', 'm', 'e', 'l'],
    ['s', 'i', 'k', 'n', 'd'],
    ['p', 'i', 'c', 'l', 'e']
]

# Instead of X and Y co-ordinates
# better to use Row and column
lenc = len(boggle[0])
lenr = len(boggle)

# Initialize trie datastructure
trie_node = {'valid': False, 'next': {}}

# lets get the delta to find all the nighbors
neighbors_delta = [
    (-1,-1, "↖"),
    (-1, 0, "↑"),
    (-1, 1, "↗"),
    (0, -1, "←"),
    (0,  1, "→"),
    (1, -1, "↙"),
    (1,  0, "↓"),
    (1,  1, "↘"),
]


def gen_trie(word, node):
    """udpates the trie datastructure using the given word"""
    if not word:
        return

    if word[0] not in node:
        node[word[0]] = {'valid': len(word) == 1, 'next': {}}

    # recursively build trie
    gen_trie(word[1:], node[word[0]])


def build_trie(words, trie):
    """Builds trie data structure from the list of words given"""
    for word in words:
        gen_trie(word, trie)
    return trie


def get_neighbors(r, c):
    """Returns the neighbors for a given co-ordinates"""
    n = []
    for neigh in neighbors_delta:
        new_r = r + neigh[0]
        new_c = c + neigh[1]

        if (new_r >= lenr) or (new_c >= lenc) or (new_r < 0) or (new_c < 0):
            continue
        n.append((new_r, new_c, neigh[2]))
    return n


def dfs(r, c, visited, trie, now_word, direction):
    """Scan the graph using DFS"""
    if (r, c) in visited:
        return

    letter = boggle[r][c]
    visited.append((r, c))

    if letter in trie:
        now_word += letter

        if trie[letter]['valid']:
            print('Found "{}" {}'.format(now_word, direction))

        neighbors = get_neighbors(r, c)
        for n in neighbors:
            dfs(n[0], n[1], visited[::], trie[letter], now_word, direction + " " + n[2])


def main(trie_node):
    """Initiate the search for words in boggle"""
    trie_node = build_trie(english_words, trie_node)

    # print the board
    print("Given board")
    for i in range(lenr):print (boggle[i])
    print ('\n')

    for r in range(lenr):
        for c in range(lenc):
            letter = boggle[r][c]
            dfs(r, c, [], trie_node, '', 'directions from ({},{})({}) go '.format(r, c, letter))


if __name__ == '__main__':
    main(trie_node)

Answer 22

我已经在 OCaml 中实现了一个解决方案。 它将字典预编译为特里树，并使用两个字母的序列频率来消除永远不会出现在单词中的边缘，以进一步加快处理速度。

它在 0.35 毫秒内解决了您的示例板问题（还有额外的 6 毫秒启动时间，这主要与将 trie 加载到内存有关）。

找到的解决方案：

["swami"; "emile"; "limbs"; "limbo"; "limes"; "amble"; "tubs"; "stub";
 "swam"; "semi"; "seam"; "awes"; "buts"; "bole"; "boil"; "west"; "east";
 "emil"; "lobs"; "limb"; "lime"; "lima"; "mesa"; "mews"; "mewl"; "maws";
 "milo"; "mile"; "awes"; "amie"; "axle"; "elma"; "fame"; "ubs"; "tux"; "tub";
 "twa"; "twa"; "stu"; "saw"; "sea"; "sew"; "sea"; "awe"; "awl"; "but"; "btu";
 "box"; "bmw"; "was"; "wax"; "oil"; "lox"; "lob"; "leo"; "lei"; "lie"; "mes";
 "mew"; "mae"; "maw"; "max"; "mil"; "mix"; "awe"; "awl"; "elm"; "eli"; "fax"]

Answer 23

Node.JS JavaScript 解决方案。 在不到一秒的时间内计算所有 100 个唯一单词，其中包括阅读词典文件 (MBA 2012)。

输出：
[“FAM”、“TUX”、“TUB”、“FAE”、“ELI”、“ELM”、“ELB”、“TWA”、“TWA”、“SAW”、“AMI”、“SWA”、” SWA"、"AME"、"SEA"、"SEW"、"AES"、"AWL"、"AWE"、"SEA"、"AWA"、"MIX"、"MIL"、"AST"、"ASE" ,"MAX","MAE","MAW","MEW","AWE","MES","AWL","LIE","LIM","AWA","AES","但是"," BLO","WAS","WAE","WEA","LEI","LEO","LOB","LOX","WEM","OIL","OLM","WEA","WAE" ,"WAX","WAF","MILO","EAST","WAME","TWAS","TWAE","EMIL","WEAM","OIME","AXIL","WEST"," TWAE","LIMB","WASE","WAST","BLEO","STUB","BOIL","BOLE","LIME","SAWT","LIMA","MESA","MEWL" ,"AXLE","FAME","ASEM","MILE","AMIL","SEAX","SEAM","SEMI","SWAM","AMBO","AMLI","AXILE"," AMBLE","SWAMI","AWEST","AWEST","LIMAX","LIMES","LIMBU","LIMBO","EMBOX","SEMBLE","EMBOLE","WAMBLE","FAMBLE" ]

代码：

var fs = require('fs')

var Node = function(value, row, col) {
    this.value = value
    this.row = row
    this.col = col
}

var Path = function() {
    this.nodes = []
}

Path.prototype.push = function(node) {
    this.nodes.push(node)
    return this
}

Path.prototype.contains = function(node) {
    for (var i = 0, ii = this.nodes.length; i < ii; i++) {
        if (this.nodes[i] === node) {
            return true
        }
    }

    return false
}

Path.prototype.clone = function() {
    var path = new Path()
    path.nodes = this.nodes.slice(0)
    return path
}

Path.prototype.to_word = function() {
    var word = ''

    for (var i = 0, ii = this.nodes.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        word += this.nodes[i].value
    }

    return word
}

var Board = function(nodes, dict) {
    // Expects n x m array.
    this.nodes = nodes
    this.words = []
    this.row_count = nodes.length
    this.col_count = nodes[0].length
    this.dict = dict
}

Board.from_raw = function(board, dict) {
    var ROW_COUNT = board.length
      , COL_COUNT = board[0].length

    var nodes = []

    // Replace board with Nodes
    for (var i = 0, ii = ROW_COUNT; i < ii; ++i) {
        nodes.push([])
        for (var j = 0, jj = COL_COUNT; j < jj; ++j) {
            nodes[i].push(new Node(board[i][j], i, j))
        }
    }

    return new Board(nodes, dict)
}

Board.prototype.toString = function() {
    return JSON.stringify(this.nodes)
}

Board.prototype.update_potential_words = function(dict) {
    for (var i = 0, ii = this.row_count; i < ii; ++i) {
        for (var j = 0, jj = this.col_count; j < jj; ++j) {
            var node = this.nodes[i][j]
              , path = new Path()

            path.push(node)

            this.dfs_search(path)
        }
    }
}

Board.prototype.on_board = function(row, col) {
    return 0 <= row && row < this.row_count && 0 <= col && col < this.col_count
}

Board.prototype.get_unsearched_neighbours = function(path) {
    var last_node = path.nodes[path.nodes.length - 1]

    var offsets = [
        [-1, -1], [-1,  0], [-1, +1]
      , [ 0, -1],           [ 0, +1]
      , [+1, -1], [+1,  0], [+1, +1]
    ]

    var neighbours = []

    for (var i = 0, ii = offsets.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        var offset = offsets[i]
        if (this.on_board(last_node.row + offset[0], last_node.col + offset[1])) {

            var potential_node = this.nodes[last_node.row + offset[0]][last_node.col + offset[1]]
            if (!path.contains(potential_node)) {
                // Create a new path if on board and we haven't visited this node yet.
                neighbours.push(potential_node)
            }
        }
    }

    return neighbours
}

Board.prototype.dfs_search = function(path) {
    var path_word = path.to_word()

    if (this.dict.contains_exact(path_word) && path_word.length >= 3) {
        this.words.push(path_word)
    }

    var neighbours = this.get_unsearched_neighbours(path)

    for (var i = 0, ii = neighbours.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        var neighbour = neighbours[i]
        var new_path = path.clone()
        new_path.push(neighbour)

        if (this.dict.contains_prefix(new_path.to_word())) {
            this.dfs_search(new_path)
        }
    }
}

var Dict = function() {
    this.dict_array = []

    var dict_data = fs.readFileSync('./web2', 'utf8')
    var dict_array = dict_data.split('\n')

    for (var i = 0, ii = dict_array.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        dict_array[i] = dict_array[i].toUpperCase()
    }

    this.dict_array = dict_array.sort()
}

Dict.prototype.contains_prefix = function(prefix) {
    // Binary search
    return this.search_prefix(prefix, 0, this.dict_array.length)
}

Dict.prototype.contains_exact = function(exact) {
    // Binary search
    return this.search_exact(exact, 0, this.dict_array.length)
}

Dict.prototype.search_prefix = function(prefix, start, end) {
    if (start >= end) {
        // If no more place to search, return no matter what.
        return this.dict_array[start].indexOf(prefix) > -1
    }

    var middle = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

    if (this.dict_array[middle].indexOf(prefix) > -1) {
        // If we prefix exists, return true.
        return true
    } else {
        // Recurse
        if (prefix <= this.dict_array[middle]) {
            return this.search_prefix(prefix, start, middle - 1)
        } else {
            return this.search_prefix(prefix, middle + 1, end)
        }
    }
}

Dict.prototype.search_exact = function(exact, start, end) {
    if (start >= end) {
        // If no more place to search, return no matter what.
        return this.dict_array[start] === exact
    }

    var middle = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

    if (this.dict_array[middle] === exact) {
        // If we prefix exists, return true.
        return true
    } else {
        // Recurse
        if (exact <= this.dict_array[middle]) {
            return this.search_exact(exact, start, middle - 1)
        } else {
            return this.search_exact(exact, middle + 1, end)
        }
    }
}

var board = [
    ['F', 'X', 'I', 'E']
  , ['A', 'M', 'L', 'O']
  , ['E', 'W', 'B', 'X']
  , ['A', 'S', 'T', 'U']
]

var dict = new Dict()

var b = Board.from_raw(board, dict)
b.update_potential_words()
console.log(JSON.stringify(b.words.sort(function(a, b) {
    return a.length - b.length
})))

Answer 24

所以我想添加另一种 PHP 方法来解决这个问题，因为每个人都喜欢 PHP。
我想做一些重构，比如使用正则表达式匹配字典文件，但现在我只是将整个字典文件加载到 wordList 中。

我使用链表的想法做到了这一点。 每个节点都有一个字符值、一个位置值和一个下一个指针。

位置值是我如何发现两个节点是否已连接的方法。

1     2     3     4
11    12    13    14
21    22    23    24
31    32    33    34

因此，使用该网格，如果第一个节点的位置等于第二个节点的位置（同一行的 +/- 1），上方和下方的行的 +/- 9、10、11，则两个节点已连接。

我使用递归进行主要搜索。 它从 wordList 中取出一个单词，找到所有可能的起点，然后递归地找到下一个可能的连接，记住它不能转到它已经使用的位置（这就是我添加 $notInLoc 的原因）。

不管怎样，我知道它需要一些重构，并且很想听听关于如何使其更清晰的想法，但它会根据我正在使用的字典文件产生正确的结果。 根据板上元音的数量和组合，大约需要 3 到 6 秒。 我知道一旦我 preg_match 字典结果，那将会显着减少。

<?php
    ini_set('xdebug.var_display_max_depth', 20);
    ini_set('xdebug.var_display_max_children', 1024);
    ini_set('xdebug.var_display_max_data', 1024);

    class Node {
        var $loc;

        function __construct($value) {
            $this->value = $value;
            $next = null;
        }
    }

    class Boggle {
        var $root;
        var $locList = array (1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32, 33, 34);
        var $wordList = [];
        var $foundWords = [];

        function __construct($board) {
            // Takes in a board string and creates all the nodes
            $node = new Node($board[0]);
            $node->loc = $this->locList[0];
            $this->root = $node;
            for ($i = 1; $i < strlen($board); $i++) {
                    $node->next = new Node($board[$i]);
                    $node->next->loc = $this->locList[$i];
                    $node = $node->next;
            }
            // Load in a dictionary file
            // Use regexp to elimate all the words that could never appear and load the 
            // rest of the words into wordList
            $handle = fopen("dict.txt", "r");
            if ($handle) {
                while (($line = fgets($handle)) !== false) {
                    // process the line read.
                    $line = trim($line);
                    if (strlen($line) > 2) {
                        $this->wordList[] = trim($line);
                    }
                }
                fclose($handle);
            } else {
                // error opening the file.
                echo "Problem with the file.";
            } 
        }

        function isConnected($node1, $node2) {
        // Determines if 2 nodes are connected on the boggle board

            return (($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 1) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 1) ||
               ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 9) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 10) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 11) ||
               ($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 9) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 10) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 11)) ? true : false;

        }

        function find($value, $notInLoc = []) {
            // Returns a node with the value that isn't in a location
            $current = $this->root;
            while($current) {
                if ($current->value == $value && !in_array($current->loc, $notInLoc)) {
                    return $current;
                }
                if (isset($current->next)) {
                    $current = $current->next;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return false;
        }

        function findAll($value) {
            // Returns an array of nodes with a specific value
            $current = $this->root;
            $foundNodes = [];
            while ($current) {
                if ($current->value == $value) {
                    $foundNodes[] = $current;
                }
                if (isset($current->next)) {
                    $current = $current->next;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return (empty($foundNodes)) ? false : $foundNodes;
        }

        function findAllConnectedTo($node, $value, $notInLoc = []) {
            // Returns an array of nodes that are connected to a specific node and 
            // contain a specific value and are not in a certain location
            $nodeList = $this->findAll($value);
            $newList = [];
            if ($nodeList) {
                foreach ($nodeList as $node2) {
                    if (!in_array($node2->loc, $notInLoc) && $this->isConnected($node, $node2)) {
                        $newList[] = $node2;
                    }
                }
            }
            return (empty($newList)) ? false : $newList;
        }



        function inner($word, $list, $i = 0, $notInLoc = []) {
            $i++;
            foreach($list as $node) {
                $notInLoc[] = $node->loc;
                if ($list2 = $this->findAllConnectedTo($node, $word[$i], $notInLoc)) {
                    if ($i == (strlen($word) - 1)) {
                        return true;
                    } else {
                        return $this->inner($word, $list2, $i, $notInLoc);
                    }
                }
            }
            return false;
        }

        function findWord($word) {
            if ($list = $this->findAll($word[0])) {
                return $this->inner($word, $list);
            }
            return false;
        }

        function findAllWords() {
            foreach($this->wordList as $word) {
                if ($this->findWord($word)) {
                    $this->foundWords[] = $word;
                }
            }
        }

        function displayBoard() {
            $current = $this->root;
            for ($i=0; $i < 4; $i++) {
                echo $current->value . " " . $current->next->value . " " . $current->next->next->value . " " . $current->next->next->next->value . "<br />";
                if ($i < 3) {
                    $current = $current->next->next->next->next;
                }
            }
        }

    }

    function randomBoardString() {
        return substr(str_shuffle(str_repeat("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz", 16)), 0, 16);
    }

    $myBoggle = new Boggle(randomBoardString());
    $myBoggle->displayBoard();
    $x = microtime(true);
    $myBoggle->findAllWords();
    $y = microtime(true);
    echo ($y-$x);
    var_dump($myBoggle->foundWords);

    ?>

Answer 25

我知道我真的迟到了，但作为编码练习，我已经用多种编程语言（C++、Java、Go、C#、Python、Ruby、JavaScript、Julia、Lua、PHP、Perl）实现了一个令人难以置信的求解器，并且我认为有人可能会对这些感兴趣，所以我在这里留下链接：
https://github.com/AmokHuginnsson/boggle-solvers

Answer 26

这是使用 NLTK 工具包中的预定义单词的解决方案
NLTK 有 nltk.corpus 包，其中我们有一个名为“words”的包，它包含超过 20 万个英语单词，您可以将所有单词简单地使用到您的程序中。

创建矩阵后，将其转换为字符数组并执行此代码

import nltk
from nltk.corpus import words
from collections import Counter

def possibleWords(input, charSet):
    for word in input:
        dict = Counter(word)
        flag = 1
        for key in dict.keys():
            if key not in charSet:
                flag = 0
        if flag == 1 and len(word)>5: #its depends if you want only length more than 5 use this otherwise remove that one. 
            print(word)


nltk.download('words')
word_list = words.words()
# prints 236736
print(len(word_list))
charSet = ['h', 'e', 'l', 'o', 'n', 'v', 't']
possibleWords(word_list, charSet)

输出：

eleven
eleventh
elevon
entente
entone
ethene
ethenol
evolve
evolvent
hellhole
helvell
hooven
letten
looten
nettle
nonene
nonent
nonlevel
notelet
novelet
novelette
novene
teenet
teethe
teevee
telethon
tellee
tenent
tentlet
theelol
toetoe
tonlet
toothlet
tootle
tottle
vellon
velvet
velveteen
venene
vennel
venthole
voeten
volent
volvelle
volvent
voteen

我希望您明白。

Answer 27

这是我的java实现： https:/ /github.com/zouzhile/interview/blob/master/src/com/interview/algorithms/tree/BoggleSolver.java

Trie 构建花费了 0 小时，0 分钟，1 秒，532 毫秒
单词搜索耗时 0 小时 0 分 0 秒 92 毫秒

eel eeler eely eer eke eker eld eleut elk ell 
elle epee epihippus ere erept err error erupt eurus eye 
eyer eyey hip hipe hiper hippish hipple hippus his hish 
hiss hist hler hsi ihi iphis isis issue issuer ist 
isurus kee keek keeker keel keeler keep keeper keld kele 
kelek kelep kelk kell kelly kelp kelper kep kepi kept 
ker kerel kern keup keuper key kyl kyle lee leek 
leeky leep leer lek leo leper leptus lepus ler leu 
ley lleu lue lull luller lulu lunn lunt lunule luo 
lupe lupis lupulus lupus lur lure lurer lush lushly lust 
lustrous lut lye nul null nun nupe nurture nurturer nut 
oer ore ort ouphish our oust out outpeep outpeer outpipe 
outpull outpush output outre outrun outrush outspell outspue outspurn outspurt 
outstrut outstunt outsulk outturn outusure oyer pee peek peel peele 
peeler peeoy peep peeper peepeye peer pele peleus pell peller 
pelu pep peplus pepper pepperer pepsis per pern pert pertussis 
peru perule perun peul phi pip pipe piper pipi pipistrel 
pipistrelle pipistrellus pipper pish piss pist plup plus plush ply 
plyer psi pst puerer pul pule puler pulk pull puller 
pulley pullus pulp pulper pulu puly pun punt pup puppis 
pur pure puree purely purer purr purre purree purrel purrer 
puru purupuru pus push puss pustule put putt puture ree 
reek reeker reeky reel reeler reeper rel rely reoutput rep 
repel repeller repipe reply repp reps reree rereel rerun reuel 
roe roer roey roue rouelle roun roup rouper roust rout 
roy rue ruelle ruer rule ruler rull ruller run runt 
rupee rupert rupture ruru rus rush russ rust rustre rut 
shi shih ship shipper shish shlu sip sipe siper sipper 
sis sish sisi siss sissu sist sistrurus speel speer spelk 
spell speller splurt spun spur spurn spurrer spurt sput ssi 
ssu stre stree streek streel streeler streep streke streperous strepsis 
strey stroup stroy stroyer strue strunt strut stu stue stull 
stuller stun stunt stupe stupeous stupp sturnus sturt stuss stut 
sue suer suerre suld sulk sulker sulky sull sully sulu 
sun sunn sunt sunup sup supe super superoutput supper supple 
supplely supply sur sure surely surrey sus susi susu susurr 
susurrous susurrus sutu suture suu tree treey trek trekker trey 
troupe trouper trout troy true truer trull truller truly trun 
trush truss trust tshi tst tsun tsutsutsi tue tule tulle 
tulu tun tunu tup tupek tupi tur turn turnup turr 
turus tush tussis tussur tut tuts tutu tutulus ule ull 
uller ulu ululu unreel unrule unruly unrun unrust untrue untruly 
untruss untrust unturn unurn upper upperer uppish uppishly uppull uppush 
upspurt upsun upsup uptree uptruss upturn ure urn uro uru 
urus urushi ush ust usun usure usurer utu yee yeel 
yeld yelk yell yeller yelp yelper yeo yep yer yere 
yern yoe yor yore you youl youp your yourn yoy 

注意：
我在本线程的开头使用了字典和字符矩阵。 该代码在我的 MacBookPro 上运行，下面是有关该机器的一些信息。

型号名称：MacBook Pro
型号标识符：MacBookPro8,1
处理器名称：英特尔酷睿 i5
处理器速度：2.3 GHz
处理器数量：1
核心总数：2
二级缓存（每个核心）：256 KB
三级缓存：3 MB
内存：4 GB
启动ROM版本：MBP81.0047.B0E
SMC版本（系统）：1.68f96

Answer 28

我也用Java解决了这个问题。 我的实现有 269 行长并且非常易于使用。 首先，您需要创建 Boggler 类的新实例，然后以网格作为参数调用求解函数。 在我的计算机上加载包含 50 000 个单词的词典大约需要 100 毫秒，并且在大约 10-20 毫秒内找到单词。 找到的单词存储在 ArrayList 中，foundWords。

import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.net.URISyntaxException;
import java.net.URL;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Comparator;

public class Boggler {
    private ArrayList<String> words = new ArrayList<String>();      
    private ArrayList<String> roundWords = new ArrayList<String>(); 
    private ArrayList<Word> foundWords = new ArrayList<Word>();     
    private char[][] letterGrid = new char[4][4];                   
    private String letters;                                         

    public Boggler() throws FileNotFoundException, IOException, URISyntaxException {
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();

        URL path = GUI.class.getResource("words.txt");
        BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new FileInputStream(new File(path.toURI()).getAbsolutePath()), "iso-8859-1"));
        String line;
        while((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
            if(line.length() < 3 || line.length() > 10) {
                continue;
            }

            this.words.add(line);
        }
    }

    public ArrayList<Word> getWords() {
        return this.foundWords;
    }

    public void solve(String letters) {
        this.letters = "";
        this.foundWords = new ArrayList<Word>();

        for(int i = 0; i < letters.length(); i++) {
            if(!this.letters.contains(letters.substring(i, i + 1))) {
                this.letters += letters.substring(i, i + 1);
            }
        }

        for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
            for(int j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
                this.letterGrid[i][j] = letters.charAt(i * 4 + j);
            }
        }

        System.out.println(Arrays.deepToString(this.letterGrid));               

        this.roundWords = new ArrayList<String>();      
        String pattern = "[" + this.letters + "]+";     

        for(int i = 0; i < this.words.size(); i++) {

            if(this.words.get(i).matches(pattern)) {
                this.roundWords.add(this.words.get(i));
            }
        }

        for(int i = 0; i < this.roundWords.size(); i++) {
            Word word = checkForWord(this.roundWords.get(i));

            if(word != null) {
                System.out.println(word);
                this.foundWords.add(word);
            }
        }       
    }

    private Word checkForWord(String word) {
        char initial = word.charAt(0);
        ArrayList<LetterCoord> startPoints = new ArrayList<LetterCoord>();

        int x = 0;  
        int y = 0;
        for(char[] row: this.letterGrid) {
            x = 0;

            for(char letter: row) {
                if(initial == letter) {
                    startPoints.add(new LetterCoord(x, y));
                }

                x++;
            }

            y++;
        }

        ArrayList<LetterCoord> letterCoords = null;
        for(int initialTry = 0; initialTry < startPoints.size(); initialTry++) {
            letterCoords = new ArrayList<LetterCoord>();    

            x = startPoints.get(initialTry).getX(); 
            y = startPoints.get(initialTry).getY();

            LetterCoord initialCoord = new LetterCoord(x, y);
            letterCoords.add(initialCoord);

            letterLoop: for(int letterIndex = 1; letterIndex < word.length(); letterIndex++) {
                LetterCoord lastCoord = letterCoords.get(letterCoords.size() - 1);  
                char currentChar = word.charAt(letterIndex);                        

                ArrayList<LetterCoord> letterLocations = getNeighbours(currentChar, lastCoord.getX(), lastCoord.getY());

                if(letterLocations == null) {
                    return null;    
                }       

                for(int foundIndex = 0; foundIndex < letterLocations.size(); foundIndex++) {
                    if(letterIndex != word.length() - 1 && true == false) {
                        char nextChar = word.charAt(letterIndex + 1);
                        int lastX = letterCoords.get(letterCoords.size() - 1).getX();
                        int lastY = letterCoords.get(letterCoords.size() - 1).getY();

                        ArrayList<LetterCoord> possibleIndex = getNeighbours(nextChar, lastX, lastY);
                        if(possibleIndex != null) {
                            if(!letterCoords.contains(letterLocations.get(foundIndex))) {
                                letterCoords.add(letterLocations.get(foundIndex));
                            }
                            continue letterLoop;
                        } else {
                            return null;
                        }
                    } else {
                        if(!letterCoords.contains(letterLocations.get(foundIndex))) {
                            letterCoords.add(letterLocations.get(foundIndex));

                            continue letterLoop;
                        }
                    }
                }
            }

            if(letterCoords != null) {
                if(letterCoords.size() == word.length()) {
                    Word w = new Word(word);
                    w.addList(letterCoords);
                    return w;
                } else {
                    return null;
                }
            }
        }

        if(letterCoords != null) {
            Word foundWord = new Word(word);
            foundWord.addList(letterCoords);

            return foundWord;
        }

        return null;
    }

    public ArrayList<LetterCoord> getNeighbours(char letterToSearch, int x, int y) {
        ArrayList<LetterCoord> neighbours = new ArrayList<LetterCoord>();

        for(int _y = y - 1; _y <= y + 1; _y++) {
            for(int _x = x - 1; _x <= x + 1; _x++) {
                if(_x < 0 || _y < 0 || (_x == x && _y == y) || _y > 3 || _x > 3) {
                    continue;
                }

                if(this.letterGrid[_y][_x] == letterToSearch && !neighbours.contains(new LetterCoord(_x, _y))) {
                    neighbours.add(new LetterCoord(_x, _y));
                }
            }
        }

        if(neighbours.isEmpty()) {
            return null;
        } else {
            return neighbours;
        }
    }
}

class Word {
    private String word;    
    private ArrayList<LetterCoord> letterCoords = new ArrayList<LetterCoord>();

    public Word(String word) {
        this.word = word;
    }

    public boolean addCoords(int x, int y) {
        LetterCoord lc = new LetterCoord(x, y);

        if(!this.letterCoords.contains(lc)) {
            this.letterCoords.add(lc);

            return true;
        }

        return false;
    }

    public void addList(ArrayList<LetterCoord> letterCoords) {
        this.letterCoords = letterCoords;
    } 

    @Override
    public String toString() {
        String outputString = this.word + " ";
        for(int i = 0; i < letterCoords.size(); i++) {
            outputString += "(" + letterCoords.get(i).getX() + ", " + letterCoords.get(i).getY() + ") ";
        }

        return outputString;
    }

    public String getWord() {
        return this.word;
    }

    public ArrayList<LetterCoord> getList() {
        return this.letterCoords;
    }
}

class LetterCoord extends ArrayList {
    private int x;          
    private int y;          

    public LetterCoord(int x, int y) {
        this.x = x;
        this.y = y;
    }

    public int getX() {
        return this.x;
    }

    public int getY() {
        return this.y;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if(!(o instanceof LetterCoord)) {
            return false;
        }

        LetterCoord lc = (LetterCoord) o;

        if(this.x == lc.getX() &&
                this.y == lc.getY()) {
            return true;
        }

        return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        int hash = 7;
        hash = 29 * hash + this.x;
        hash = 24 * hash + this.y;
        return hash;
    }
}

Answer 29

我在c中解决了这个问题。 在我的机器上运行大约需要 48 毫秒（大约 98% 的时间花在从磁盘加载字典和创建 trie 上）。 该词典是/usr/share/dict/american-english，有 62886 个单词。

源代码

Answer 30

我完美且快速地解决了这个问题。 我把它放入一个android应用程序中。 在 Play 商店链接中观看视频，了解其实际效果。

Word Cheats 是一款可以“破解”任何矩阵风格文字游戏的应用程序。 这个应用程序已构建
来帮助我在文字扰乱器上作弊。 它可以用于单词搜索，
ruzzle、单词、单词查找器、单词破解、boggle 等等！

可以在这里看到
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details ?id=com.harris.wordcracker

在视频中查看正在运行的应用程序
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL2974WmNAI