Seaside编程和其他Web编程有什么区别
对我来说，Seaside 的要点似乎是它更像普通的“桌面”编程。
控制流看起来更像“传统”编程，而不是 “网络”编程。 这是正确的印象吗？
我知道这是关于 Web 编程的，但从程序员的角度来看，它看起来并不像。 它看起来不仅仅是驱动“桌面”应用程序。 这是否澄清了问题一点？
To me it seems the main point of Seaside is that it is more like normal "desktop" programming.
The control flow looks much more like "traditional" programming instead of
"web" programming. Is that a correct impression?
I know it's about Web programming but it's does not looks like it from the programmers side. It looks much more than driving "desktop" applications. Does this clarify the question a bit?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
Seaside 的重点并不在于真正像桌面编程，尽管它确实试图减轻 Web 开发的大部分痛苦。 Seaside 因两件事而闻名，您可能会认为“类似于桌面应用程序”：
这些东西都会极大地简化某些 Web 开发任务，尽管第一个最终在实践中很少使用。
不过，Seaside 还提供了许多其他功能：
大多数并不是海边独有的，但它们有些不寻常。 那么它与其他网络编程有什么不同呢？ 你可以用 Smalltalk 来写作。 您不必在代码和模板语言之间来回切换思维上下文。 您不必担心表单字段名称、URL 等，除非/直到您愿意。 如果您使用 Seaside，您可能不会那么讨厌 Web 编程。
人们可能会因为 Seaside 的“桌面编程功能”而发现它，但他们通常会为了所有其他东西而闲逛。
The point of Seaside is not really to be like desktop programming, though it does try to take much of the pain out of web development. Seaside is known for two things which you might consider "desktop-application-like":
These things vastly simplify certain web development tasks, though the first ends up being used fairly infrequently in practice.
Seaside provides many other things, though:
Most of these are not unique to Seaside but they are somewhat unusual. So how is it different from other web programming? You get to write in Smalltalk. You don't have to mentally context-shift back and forth between code and a templating language. You don't have to worry about form field names, URLs, etc. unless/until you want to. You probably won't hate web programming as much if you use Seaside.
People may discover Seaside because of its "desktop programming features" but they usually hang around for all the other stuff.
你的印象是正确的。 Seaside 是为我所说的树状控制流而设计的，就像桌面 GUI 应用程序一样。 与另一个 Smalltalk Web 框架 Aida/Web 相比，该框架用于类似图形的控制流，即实际上是您在网络上拥有的内容。
但树状控制流在诸如确认对话框之类的情况下非常有用，或者对于像现在 Facebook 上频繁出现的弹出窗口这样的情况非常有用。 这就是为什么我们也在 Aida/Web 中引入树状控制流，即将两种控制流结合在一起。
Your impression is correct. Seaside is designed for what I call a tree-like control flow, as desktop GUI apps have. Comparing to the Aida/Web, another Smalltalk web framework, which is meant for graph-like control flow, and that is actually what you have on the web.
But tree-like control flow is very useful in such cases like confirmation dialogs, or for popups like those very frequent on Facebook these days. That's why we are introducing the tree-like control flow in Aida/Web too, that is, we are combining both control flows together.
Seaside 是一个应用程序框架，用于开发用 Smalltalk 编写的 Web 应用程序。 它看起来像“传统”编程是什么意思
编辑-
Seaside is an app framework for developing web apps written in smalltalk. What do you mean by it looks like "traditional" programming
Edit-