IDataReader 造成的 .NET 对象水合作用导致性能下降
我正在尝试水合约 400 个业务对象的列表,当需要水合字符串时,性能变得非常慢。 400 个物体的水合需要超过 20 秒。
编辑
我们使用 MySQL 5.1 和 dotConnect for MySQL v5.0.12 作为数据提供者http://www.devart.com/dotconnect/mysql/
我做了一些基准测试,将其范围缩小到导致问题的字符串类型。 我开始测量从记录 2 到记录 n 的时间,以忽略加载其他程序集可能占用的时间。
下面的代码在 0 毫秒内水合 1 个对象
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
这也在 0 毫秒内水合 1 个对象
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
objUserInfo.Firstname = "FirstName"
但是,一旦我将数据读取器对象转换为字符串,平均需要 53 毫秒
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
objUserInfo.Firstname = Convert.ToString(dr("FirstName"))
我也尝试水合 2 个字符串并勒死,它不会吹坏性能几乎与 1 根弦一样多? 下面的代码平均只需要 57ms 来水合 1 个对象
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
objUserInfo.Firstname = Convert.ToString(dr("FirstName"))
objUserInfo.LastName = Convert.ToString(dr("LastName"))
我知道很多人使用上面的语法来水合业务对象。 有没有更有效/更快的方法来做到这一点?
编辑 刚刚做了另一个测试,即在字符串上进行直接投射,它产生相同的慢速:( 53ms 只是为了进行投射。
objUserInfo.FirstName = DirectCast("alex", String)
I am trying to hydrate a list of ~400 business objects and the performance becomes very slow when it needs to hydrate strings. It's taking in excess of 20secs to hydrate the 400 objects.
EDIT
We are using MySQL 5.1 and dotConnect for MySQL v5.0.12 as the data provider http://www.devart.com/dotconnect/mysql/
I did some benchmarks to narrow it down to the string types causing the problems. I started measuring the time from record 2 to n to ignore the time that might get taken up loading other assemblies.
The following code hydrates 1 object in 0ms
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
This also hydrates 1 object in 0ms
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
objUserInfo.Firstname = "FirstName"
However as soon as i do the convert on the datareader object to a string it takes an average of 53ms
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
objUserInfo.Firstname = Convert.ToString(dr("FirstName"))
I also tried hydrating 2 strings and strangley it doesn't blow the performance out nearly as much as 1 string?
The following only takes an average of 57ms to hydrate 1 object
objUserInfo.PortalID = portalId
objUserInfo.IsSuperUser = Convert.ToBoolean(dr("IsSuperUser"))
objUserInfo.UserID = Convert.ToInt32(dr("UserID"))
objUserInfo.Firstname = Convert.ToString(dr("FirstName"))
objUserInfo.LastName = Convert.ToString(dr("LastName"))
I know that a lot of people use the above syntax to hydrate business objects. Is there a more efficient/faster way to do this?
EDIT
Just did another test which was to do a directcast on a string and it produces the same slow speeds :( 53ms just to do the cast.
objUserInfo.FirstName = DirectCast("alex", String)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(3)
尝试一下:
而不是
使用
Convert.ToString(dr("FirstName"))
正在执行一些丑陋的隐式且耗时的转换和/或(取消)装箱操作。)编辑:亚历克斯发现了问题。 不是选角问题! 他对此的评论是:
Give this a try:
Instead of
use
Convert.ToString(dr("FirstName"))
is doing some ugly implicit and time consuming conversions and/or (un)boxing operations.)Edit: Alex found the problem. It's not a casting problem! His comment about it:
您使用什么数据提供商? 我们在 Oracle One 上遇到了一个丑陋的问题。
最有效的方法是调用 dr.GetString(columnNumber) - 其中通过 dr.GetOrdinal(columnName) 获取的列号(您可以在读取循环开始时缓存)。
然而,这不应该是真正的问题。 不能是列的大小吗?
What data provider do you use? We had an ugly issue with oracle one.
The most efficient would be to call dr.GetString(columnNumber) - where the column number you get by dr.GetOrdinal(columnName) (which you can cache at the beginning of your read loop).
However this should not really be the issue. Can't it be the size of columns?
您如何测量时间? 也许涉及到额外的程序集加载,并且您的 53 毫秒考虑了这一点。
您应该仅在第一个循环(第一次水合作用)之后开始测量时间。 这样,任何装配加载都将在测量之前完成。
How are you measuring the time? Maybe there's an additional assembly loading involved and your 53 ms takes that into account.
You should start measuring the time only after the first loop (first hydration). This way any assembly loading will be done before the measurement.