Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 11 years ago.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
接受
或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
发布评论
评论(8)
最简单的方法是使用 GUI GUI 构建器。
GTK 的 Glade。
用于 QT 的 QT 设计器。
wxDesigner 和 wxFormBuilder 用于 wxWidgets。
更新:我应该提到这些输出 C++ 等等?
The easiest way is to use an GUI GUI builder.
Glade for GTK.
QT Designer for QT.
wxDesigner and wxFormBuilder for wxWidgets.
Update: I should mention that these output C++ among many others?
我个人更喜欢 QT,因为我更喜欢使用信号/槽机制,并且发现使用它可以轻松快速地开发应用程序。 其他一些选择是 wxWidgets 和 GTK+。
I personally prefer QT as I prefer working with the signal/slots mechanism and just find it easy to develop applications quickly with it. Some of your other options would be wxWidgets and GTK+.
gtkmm 是与 gtk 的 C++ 绑定,它应该可以正常工作
gtkmm is the c++ binding to gtk, it should work fine
需要澄清一下到目前为止提到的工具包(GTK+、QT 和 wxWidgets)
GTK+ 是 GNOME 使用的工具包
QT 是 KDE 使用的工具包
wxWidget 旨在成为那些(和其他)工具包之上的抽象,以减少桌面环境的特定性。
另一个值得一看的工具包是 EFL 使用的工具包E17,虽然这个桌面环境的缓慢开发速度可能会让你失望,但我听说它的设计不错。 请注意,Enlightenment 项目中的一些组件(例如 imlib2)已被其他项目使用多年。
Just to be clear about the toolkits mentioned so far (GTK+,QT and wxWidgets)
GTK+ is the toolkit used by GNOME
QT is the toolkit used by KDE
wxWidget aims to be an abstraction above those (and others) to be less desktop environment specific.
Another toolkit worh takeing a peek at is EFL the toolkit used by E17, although the glacier development speed of this desktop environment may put you off, I hear nice things about it's design. Note that some components from the Enlightenment project such as imlib2 has been used for years by other projects.
尝试一下 QT,它可以在 Ubuntu 上运行,并且背后有很多开发工具和文档。
例如教程,或另一个教程 或另一个 教程
Try QT, it will work on Ubuntu, and has a lot of development tools and documentation behind it.
eg a tutorial, or another tutorial or yet another tutorial
我建议Juce。 它优雅、跨平台、快速、编写良好、几乎完全没有错误,并且与其运行的每个平台上的最后一个像素都相同。 已知错误的数量几乎总是零,因为当提交错误报告时,作者会放弃所有内容并修复它! The Register 不久前写了一篇关于它的文章,其中给出了对图书馆的概述相当好。
I suggest Juce. It's elegant, cross-platform, fast, well-written, almost totally bug-free and is identical to the last pixel on every platform it runs on. The number of known bugs is nearly always zero, since when a bug report is filed, the author drops everything and fixes it! The Register wrote an article about it a while ago which gives a rather good overview of the library.
最简单的方法肯定是Ultimate++。 我无法说出它有多棒,你只需尝试一下并被自己说服即可。 以下是完整申请:
The easiest way is definitely Ultimate++. I can't tell how awesome it is, you just have to try it and be convinced by yourself. Following is a full application:
我个人可以保证 qt 的易用性,以及 Linux 特定开发的易用性。 一探究竟 :)
I can personally vouch for the ease of use of qt in general, as well as linux specific development. CHeck it out :)