从广义上讲，根据 GPL 许可产品并不禁止任何人出售该产品以获取金钱。 它规定的是，被许可人必须向获得最终产品的任何人免费提供源代码（如果以 CD 形式发送，则收取少量费用以支付费用，但不盈利）。
免责声明：我不是律师。 您应该咨询版权律师，了解根据 GPL 许可某些内容的实际法律影响。
You can release your code under any license to others. That does not automatically apply the same license to you. However, if you release your code under GPL and you accept contributions, any branch of the code that contains these contributions is GPL licensed to you. That's one of the reasons Sun for example requires the copiright for any contribution to MySQL to be assigned to them, so that they do not fall under the GPL license and be able to dual-license MySQL.
GPL license applies only to your code, not the data processed with that code. If you are writing CMS for example, you can GPL the source code, yet the published content is under whatever license the author has chosen. To that effect, AdSense is a content, so GPL should not apply to it.
In broad sense, licensing a product under GPL does not prohibit anyone from selling that product for money. All it states is that the licensee must make the source code available for free (or a small charge to cover expenses if sending it on CD, but no profit) to whoever gets the end product as well.
Disclaimer: I am not an attorney. You should talk to a copyright lawyer for the actual legal implications of licensing something under GPL.
Yes, you can run adsense on your website if you release the code under a GPL-style license. There are no provisions in the GPL or LGPL that prevent you from making money on your code.
Broadly speaking, the restrictions say that you must give others the same opportunity using your code if you choose to release it under a GPL/LGPL license.
发布评论
评论（2）
您可以根据任何许可向其他人发布您的代码。 这不会自动向您应用相同的许可证。 但是，如果您根据 GPL 发布代码并且接受贡献，则包含这些贡献的代码的任何分支都是 GPL 许可给您的。 这就是 Sun 要求将 MySQL 的任何贡献的版权分配给他们的原因之一，这样他们就不会受到 GPL 许可证的约束，并且能够获得 MySQL 的双重许可证。
GPL 许可证仅适用于您的代码，不适用于使用该代码处理的数据。 例如，如果您正在编写 CMS，则可以 GPL 源代码，但发布的内容采用作者选择的任何许可证。 为此，AdSense 是一种内容，因此 GPL 不应适用于它。
从广义上讲，根据 GPL 许可产品并不禁止任何人出售该产品以获取金钱。 它规定的是，被许可人必须向获得最终产品的任何人免费提供源代码（如果以 CD 形式发送，则收取少量费用以支付费用，但不盈利）。
免责声明：我不是律师。 您应该咨询版权律师，了解根据 GPL 许可某些内容的实际法律影响。
You can release your code under any license to others. That does not automatically apply the same license to you. However, if you release your code under GPL and you accept contributions, any branch of the code that contains these contributions is GPL licensed to you. That's one of the reasons Sun for example requires the copiright for any contribution to MySQL to be assigned to them, so that they do not fall under the GPL license and be able to dual-license MySQL.
GPL license applies only to your code, not the data processed with that code. If you are writing CMS for example, you can GPL the source code, yet the published content is under whatever license the author has chosen. To that effect, AdSense is a content, so GPL should not apply to it.
In broad sense, licensing a product under GPL does not prohibit anyone from selling that product for money. All it states is that the licensee must make the source code available for free (or a small charge to cover expenses if sending it on CD, but no profit) to whoever gets the end product as well.
Disclaimer: I am not an attorney. You should talk to a copyright lawyer for the actual legal implications of licensing something under GPL.
是的，如果您根据 GPL 样式许可证发布代码，则可以在您的网站上运行 adsense。 GPL 或 LGPL 中没有任何条款阻止您通过代码赚钱。
从广义上讲，这些限制规定，如果您选择根据 GPL/LGPL 许可证发布代码，则必须为其他人提供使用您的代码的相同机会。
免责声明：我不是律师等。
Yes, you can run adsense on your website if you release the code under a GPL-style license. There are no provisions in the GPL or LGPL that prevent you from making money on your code.
Broadly speaking, the restrictions say that you must give others the same opportunity using your code if you choose to release it under a GPL/LGPL license.
Disclaimer: I'm not an attorney, etc.