在线协作环境（不仅面向开发）
我使用 SVN 已经有几年了，最近正在从事一些涉及 Trac 的项目。 对于大多数人来说，这可能看起来很奇怪，但我来自以设计为导向的背景，这些工具并不经常使用。
目前我们主要使用 Basecamp 来跟踪客户需求、文档等。 另一方面，SVN 用于源代码控制（仅限开发人员之间）。
因此，目标是将 Trac 集成到捆绑包（也许还有其他有用的功能）中，我一直在寻找可以满足这些要求的在线环境。 那里有很多东西，但我主要担心的是，我不想用太极客的东西吓坏设计师、项目经理和客户。
到目前为止，我发现的最合适的解决方案是 Assembla。
非常欢迎任何建议！
谢谢，
T
编辑：
感谢大家的意见！ 不过，答案是自动投票的。 我们目前正在尝试 REDMINE。
I've been working with SVN for a couple of years and recently been working on some projects involving Trac. It might seem odd for most of you but I come from design oriented background where those tools are not so often used.
For the moment we mostly use Basecamp to keep track of client requirements, documents etc.
And on the other hand SVN for source control (between developers only).
So, the aim being to integrate Trac to the bundle (and maybe other helpful features) I've been looking around for an online environment that could fulfill these requirements. There's a lot out there but my main concern is that I don't want to freak out the designers, project managers, clients with something too geeky.
So far the most appropriate solution I've found is Assembla.
Any advice is more than welcome!
Thanks,
T
EDIT :
Thanks all for your input! An answer was voted automatically although.
We are currently giving REDMINE a try.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（6）
组装是一个不错的选择。 您也可以尝试 devjavu 。 我已经使用它们好几年了，devjavu 的环境更干净。
我在两个项目中亲眼目睹了“SVN 和 trac 的实际应用”，我曾与设计师、项目经理以及以前从未接触过版本控制系统的人员合作过。 他们使用了最常见的功能，没有出现任何问题，我认为如果您的团队可以接受 2 小时关于使用 Subversion 进行版本控制的主要概念的培训，那么这应该不是一个大问题。
编辑：
关于这个主题有一个比较页面，它应该是一个很好的资源。 如果不是，至少他们有大量 svn 托管服务的链接。 ;)
Assembla is a good option. You can try devjavu as well. I've used both of them for a couple of years, devjavu has a cleaner environment.
I've seen 'SVN-and-trac in action' in two projects I've worked among with designers, project managers, people that had no previous contact with a version control system. They used the most common features without problems, I don't think it should be a big concern if your team could have a 2-hour training about the main concepts of version controlling with subversion.
EDIT:
There is a comparison page on this subject, it should be a good resource. In case it isn't, at least they have a large amount of links to svn hosting services. ;)
您正在寻找托管还是非托管？ 我们正在使用 redmine，它是 Trac 的替代品，它轻而易举设置和使用。 用户界面简单直观。 配置非常灵活，允许多个项目，源代码管理集成（对于 SVN、git、CVS，所有常见的），集成 wiki、论坛、文件等。其他可以折腾的名称包括 解除混淆，jira、灯塔 和 筛选应用程序。
Are you looking for hosted or non-hosted? We're using redmine, an alternative to Trac, which was a breeze to set-up and use. The UI is simple and intuitive. Quite flexible with configuration, allows multiple projects, Source Code Management integration (for SVN, git, CVS, all the common ones), integrated wiki, forums, files, etc. Other names to toss around include unfuddle, jira, lighthouse, and sifter app.
这可能不太适合您正在寻找的内容，但是您是否考虑过 Google 代码？ Bug 跟踪、版本控制、wiki。 它甚至是免费的。
This may not be a perfect fit for what you're looking for, but have you considered google code? Bug Tracking, version control, wiki's. It's even free.
我推荐 Confluence。 它非常灵活，并且可以托管和非托管。
它的核心是一个 wiki，但它对页面和附件有很好的版本管理。 它跟踪谁更改了什么，并且权限系统允许您指定谁看到什么（例如，允许您的客户访问，但仅限相关区域）。 它具有很好的集成选项，例如远程 API 接口、WebDAV 接口，并且有大量插件可用于默认情况下未包含的功能。
您还可以查看 Jira，它对于项目管理更有用。
不，我不为 Atlassian 工作。
I'd recommend Confluence. It's flexible, and available hosted and non-hosted.
It's a wiki at the core, but it has nice version management, for pages as well as attachments. It keeps track of who changes what, and the permission system allows you to specify who sees what (for instance, to allow your clients access, but only to relevant areas). It has nice integration options, such as a remote API interface, a WebDAV interface, and there's plenty of plugins available for functionality not included by default.
You could also have a look at Jira, which is more useful for project management.
No, I do not work for atlassian.
我已经使用 Unfuddle 快两年了。
这是优秀。 它支持 SVN 和 GIT 托管，不吝惜在线空间，内置错误/问题跟踪（可以从 Trac 导入）并与 SVN 集成，有 wiki、迷你论坛、时间跟踪...但它非常有用使用简单并且具有非极客界面。
它还有一个干净的 API。 我通过一个简单的 Powershell 脚本进行备份（它们也会自动执行，但我对我的数据非常小心）。
他们非常以客户为导向：一旦我需要他们导入我之前拥有的 SVN 存储库，他们就会在半小时左右的时间内回复并完成工作。
提供多种级别的服务，从免费到中等昂贵。 我想说总体价格非常合理。
我没有什么可否认的，也没有任何附属关系，只是一个非常满意的客户。
I have been using for almost two years now Unfuddle.
It's excellent. It does SVN and GIT hosting, does not skimp on online space, has bug/issue tracking built-in (can import from Trac) AND integrated with the SVN, has wiki, mini-forums, time-tracking... yet it's very simple to use and has non-geeky interface.
It also has a clean API. I do the backup (they do it automatically as well, but I'm super careful with my data) via a simple Powershell script.
They are very customer-oriented: once I needed them to import a SVN repo I had from before and they replied and did the work inside a half-an-hour or so.
There are several levels of service offered, from free to moderately expensive. I'd say overall prices are very reasonable.
I have nothing to disclaim and am in no way affiliated, just a very happy customer.
我使用 SVN+TRAC+MediaWIKI 作为开发过程所有链之间的整个交互的主要工具。
开发人员使用 SVN 进行版本控制，使用 TRAC 监控问题 QA 报告，使用 WIKI 作为需求和技术文档的来源。
QA 使用 TRAC 来报告问题，并使用 WIKI 作为工作流程和需求的来源。
PM 和 TL 使用 TRAC 来构建燃尽报告，并使用 WIKI 作为各种文档的来源。
高层管理人员通过燃尽图看到了冰山的顶部。
因此我建议使用 TRAC 与 SVN 和 MediaWIKI 集成。 一切都是免费的。
运行它只需要一些时间。
I use SVN+TRAC+MediaWIKI as main tool for entire interaction between all chains of development process.
Developers use SVN for versioning, TRAC for monitoring issues QA report and WIKI as source of requirement and technical documentation.
QA use TRAC for reporting issues and WIKI for as source of workflows and requirements.
PMs and TLs use TRAC for building burndown reports and WIKI as source of all kind of documentation.
Top management see a top part of the iceberg visualized by burndown graphics.
So I can recommend to use TRAC with integration with SVN and MediaWIKI. All is free.
There's only some time effort required to run it.