什么屏幕尺寸更适合最终用户
我有一个软件，最小屏幕尺寸要求是1024x768，800x600可能太小，1024x768太大？ 也许介于两者之间？ 什么屏幕尺寸更好或最好？ 谢谢。
I have a SW that the minimal screen size requirement is 1024x768, 800x600 may be too small, 1024x768 would be too big? Maybe something in between? What screen size is better or the best? Thanks.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（11）
您是否想问您应该设计什么尺寸的应用程序？ 如果是这样，最好的“尺寸”将是一个流动的布局，允许用户设置适合他们和他们的显示器的任何尺寸。
Are you asking what size you should design your application for?? If so, the best "size" would be a flowing layout that allows the user to set whatever size suits them and their monitor.
如今，1024x768 是标准且首选的屏幕尺寸。 大多数基于 Web 的应用程序、网站都按照 1024x768 标准设计其网站。 但是，如果您的应用程序是桌面应用程序，则可以选择较小的初始大小。 但是，当您将应用程序最大化到更高分辨率时，您必须确保 UI 不会变坏。
Nowdays, 1024x768 is the standard and preferred screen size. Most of the web based applications, web-sites design their sites as per 1024x768 standard. But, you could go for a lesser intial size if yours is a desktop allipcation. But then you have to make sure that UI doesn't go bad when you maximize the application to a higher resolution.
您可以将最小尺寸设置为您想要的任何尺寸，只要您的软件在所有大于该尺寸的尺寸上看起来都不错。
如果很多人仍然运行 800x600，我会感到惊讶，但他们可能会这样做，如果不处理它，您将限制您的市场。 就我个人而言，我认为这不会有太大限制。
此外，800x600 和 1024x768 之间的差距并不大，它们是两个紧邻的“标准”分辨率。 因此，如果您认为 1024x768 太大（事实并非如此），800x600 是下一个选择。
You can set your minimum size to whatever you want, as long as your software looks nice on all sizes greater than that.
I'd be surprised if many people still ran 800x600 but they may, and you will be limiting your market by not handling it. Personally, I don't think that would be much of a limit.
In addition, there's not a lot between 800x600 and 1024x768, they're the two "standard" resolutions right next to each other. So if you think 1024x768 is too big (it's not), 800x600 is the next option down.
只有对话框应该是固定大小的，而不是全部。 所有其他 UI 窗口应使用基于流的布局，以适应可用窗口。 WinForms 中对动态布局的管理有广泛的支持，XAML 中的支持甚至更好。
您可能已经见过设计为固定宽度的网站，但恕我直言，这是无能或懒惰的标志。 或者可能是形式战胜功能。
这些都不是一个好的借口。 它们在我的 3840x1200 显示器（两个链接的 1920x1200 显示器）上看起来都很可笑，随着革命的到来，固定布局 UI 的设计师将是第一个面对墙屏幕的人。
Only dialog boxes should be fixed size, and not all of them. All other UI windows should use flow-based layout so as to adapt to the available window. There is extensive support for the management of dynamic layout in WinForms and even better support in XAML.
You may well have seen websites designed for fixed width but this is IMHO a sign of either incompetence or laziness. Or possibly a triumph of form over function.
None of these is a good excuse. They all look ridiculous on my 3840x1200 display (two linked 1920x1200 monitors) and come the revolution, designers of fixed-layout UI will be the first up against the wallscreen.
查看 w3schools 的浏览器显示统计信息，这可能是一个好的开始。 但要小心，正如他们所说：
这完全取决于您确定用户细分的程度。
Check out the browser display statistics at w3schools, it might be a good start. But beware, as they say:
It's all up to how well you can determine your user segment.
对于 Windows 应用程序，请将其设计为 800x600。 这样，拥有 1024x768 屏幕的用户无需最大化窗口即可查看所有内容（少数拥有 800x600 屏幕的用户仍然可以查看它）。
For a Windows app, design it for 800x600. That way users with 1024x768 screens don't need to maximize the Window to see everything (and the few users with 800x600 screens can still view it).
我很惊讶没有人提到上网本。 如果您的应用程序可以在上网本上运行，您可能需要考虑低于 1024x768 的分辨率。 例如，7 英寸华硕 EeePC 的分辨率为 800x480，9 英寸到 10 英寸型号的分辨率通常为 1024x600。
编辑：同意无论如何都应使用流动布局，但我正在谈论应该使用的最小尺寸工作。
I am surprised that nobody has mentioned netbooks. If your application could conceivably run on a netbook, you may want to consider resolutions lower than 1024x768. For instance, the 7" Asus EeePC has a resolution of 800x480 and the 9" to 10" models typically have a resolution of 1024x600.
EDIT: Agreed that a flowing layout should be used regardless, but I was talking about the minimum size that should work.
[我假设您指的是桌面应用程序]
虽然 1024x768 是一个合理的屏幕分辨率，所有最新的显示器（我猜是在过去 4 年购买的）都支持它，但我大多数软件仍然可以使用 800x600。
是什么让您的软件需要这种分辨率？ 我希望你没有那么大的对话。 如果有，请考虑将它们拆分为选项卡表或向导。
[I assume you are referring to a desktop application]
Though 1024x768 is a reasonable screen resolution which is supported by all recent monitors (purchased in last 4 years I guess), yet I most software still work with 800x600.
What makes your software require that resolution? I hope you dont have a dialog which is that big. If there are some, consider splitting them into tab sheets or wizards.
现在如果找不到 1024x768 或更低的显示器也没关系。 即使每个人都有 1920x1200，为什么你的应用程序应该是屏幕上唯一的一个？ 窗口 GUI 的想法是同时使用多个窗口。
首先，我从不使用“最大化”按钮。 即使是真正身临其境的应用程序（例如 CAD）也应该为其他工具留出一些空间。
it doesn't matter if you can't find a 1024x768 or lower monitor these days. even if everybody has 1920x1200, why should your app be the only one on screen? the idea of windowing GUIs is to use several windows at the same time.
i, for one, never use the 'maximize' button. even really immersive apps (think CADs) should leave some space for other tools.
如今，约 960 像素宽是一个相当常见的标准。
~960px wide is a pretty common standard these days.
您需要做的最终事情是找出您的目标受众正在运行或可能运行的内容。 也就是说，您的应用程序应该能够应对几乎任何合理的屏幕分辨率。 它不必在过低的分辨率下看起来漂亮，但它必须在过低的分辨率下起作用。 我知道有几个应用程序缺乏低分辨率功能部分，而且它们相当烦人。
如果您的应用程序比平常更重要，您将需要更加确保它能够在分辨率受限的环境中运行。 对于 Windows 和 Linux 系统，默认的故障安全分辨率（取决于系统）为 640x480 或 800x600。 如果您希望您的应用程序被认为是关键的，那么它应该能够在这样的限制条件下工作。
The ultimate thing you need to do is to find out what your target audience is running, or is likely to run. That said, your applications should be able to cope with nearly any reasonable screen resolution. It doesn't have to look pretty at excessively low resolutions, but it does have to be functional at excessively low resolutions. I know several applications that lack the functional-at-low-resolutions part, and they are rather annoying.
If your application is something that is more crucial than usual, you'll want to make even more sure that it will work in resolution-constrained environments. For both Windows and Linux systems, the default fail-safe resolution (depending on the system) is either 640x480 or 800x600. If you expect your application to be considered critical, it should be able to work in even such restrictive conditions.