We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for software libraries, tutorials, tools, books, or other off-site resources. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 9 years ago.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
接受
或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
发布评论
评论(1)
Stephen Fry 在这里祝 GNU 生日快乐,它是一块简洁的手表。 我认为你的问题消除了需要更多视频来解释 FLOSS 社区中经常发生的纠葛的需要。
另请理解,“开源”和“自由软件”可能有不同的含义,具体取决于与您交谈的对象。
最有趣的讨论发生在邮件列表上,而不是 YouTube 或类似的地方。
您可能还会喜欢这些有关 GPL3 的视频。
大多数通过代码而不是说话完成更多工作的人不喜欢制作视频。 这并不是对 RMS 的猛烈攻击,极客喜欢被存放在阴凉、黑暗、干燥的地方,除非激进主义能让他们高兴。
对这些名称中的任何一个与“软件许可证”进行简单搜索应该会发现更多内容:
维基百科对上述所有内容都有很好的信息。
再说一遍,这并不是对 RMS 的猛烈攻击,但任何制作讨论理想主义主题的视频的人都有一些理想可以卖给你。 仅靠视频并不是了解 FLOSS 社区政治分歧的最佳方式,其影响力几乎不亚于软件专利。 做一些真正的阅读和研究。
只是,无论您做什么,都不要编写自己的许可证,请参阅许可证扩散了解更多信息。
Stephen Fry wished GNU a happy birthday here, its a neat watch. I think your question obviates the need for more videos that explain entanglements that occur frequently in the FLOSS community.
Please also understand that 'open source' and 'free software' can mean different things, depending on who you are speaking with.
Most interesting discussions happen on mailing lists, not Youtube or similar.
You might also enjoy these videos regarding GPL3.
Most people who get more done through code rather than speaking do not enjoy making videos. That is not a slam against RMS, geeks like to be stored in cool, dark, dry places unless activism is what makes them happy.
A simple search on any of these names in conjunction with 'software license' should turn up more:
Wikipedia has good info on all of the above.
Again, not a slam on RMS, but anyone making a video discussing an idealistic topic has some ideal to sell you. Videos alone are not the best way of learning the politics that divide the FLOSS community almost as much as software patents. Do some real reading and research.
Just, whatever you do, don't write your own license, see license proliferation for more.