为什么使用 WAS-CE 而不是 Apache Geronimo?

发布于 2024-07-13 19:07:33 字数 93 浏览 5 评论 0原文

通过使用 IBM WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 而不是 Apache Geronimo,我可以获得哪些好处?

What benefits do I gain by using IBM WebSphere Application Server Community Edition over Apache Geronimo?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

记忆消瘦 2024-07-20 19:07:33

据我记忆中的一些 IBM 演示,WAS CE 和 Geronimo 代码库之间没有太大区别。 尽管过去有一些 WAS CE 特定的开发,但 Geronimo 项目采用了专门为 WAS CE 开发的组件。

我看到的主要 WAS CE 优势有:

  • IBM 信息中心的 WAS CE 文档。 其他 IBM 的中间件在那里有相当详细的文档,所以对我来说,这确实是一个好处。
  • IBM 对 WAS CE 的支持方式与对其他 IBM 产品的支持方式相同,
  • 支持从 CE 迁移到其他 Websphere 产品。
  • 支持更多操作系统(好吧,这不是一个大好处,但在某些情况下可以使安装更容易)。
  • 嵌入式 Derby DB(同样,至少它在一定程度上简化了安装)

如果您计划将来迁移到其他 Websphere AS,那么 WAS CE 无疑是更好的选择。 另请注意,两个应用程序服务器的许可有所不同 - WAS CE 使用 IBM 许可证,而不是 Apache 许可证。

As far as I remember from some of IBM's demos, there are not much differences between WAS CE's and Geronimo codebases. Altough there was some WAS CE specific development in the past, components developed specificaly for WAS CE were adopted by the Geronimo project.

The main WAS CE benefits I see are:

  • Documentation for WAS CE at IBM's Infocenter. Other IBM's middlewares are documented fairly well there, so to me, this really would be a benefit.
  • IBM provides support for WAS CE the same way it does for other IBM products
  • Migration from CE to other Websphere products is supported.
  • More OSs are supported (well, not a big benefit, but it could make the installation easier in some cases).
  • Derby DB embedded (again, at least it somewhat simplifies installation)

If you plan to move to other Websphere AS in the future, then WAS CE is certainly a better choice. Also note there is a difference in licensing of both appservers - WAS CE uses an IBM licence, not the Apache one.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文