用于动态调度的部分模板特化
我正在尝试为基于整数值(而不是类型)模板化的函数编写动态调度程序。 虽然我可以编写代码生成器或使用大宏链来创建调度程序源,但模板化解决方案似乎会更优雅。
我已将调度程序简化为简单的形式(实际上并不执行任何调度):
// works fine with full template specialization
template <int N>
struct TestDispatcher1D {
int f(int n) {
if (n == N) return n; // replace me with actual dispatch
TestDispatcher1D<N-1> t;
return t.f(n);
}
};
template<>
struct TestDispatcher1D<-1> {
int f(int n) { return -1; }
};
// partial template specialization is problematic
template <int M, int N>
struct TestDispatcher2D {
int f(int m, int n);
};
template<int M>
struct TestDispatcher2D<M,-1> {
int f(int m, int n) { return -1; }
};
template<int N>
struct TestDispatcher2D<-1,N> {
int f(int m, int n) { return -1; }
};
template<>
struct TestDispatcher2D<-1,-1> {
int f(int m, int n) { return -1; }
};
template <int M, int N>
int TestDispatcher2D<M,N>::f(int m, int n) {
if ((n == N) && (m == M)) return n + m; // replace me with actual dispatch
if (m < M) {
if (n < N) {
TestDispatcher2D<M-1,N-1> t;
return t(m,n);
} else {
TestDispatcher2D<M-1,N> t;
return t(m,n);
}
} else {
TestDispatcher2D<M,N-1> t;
return t(m,n);
}
}
// test code
void testIt() {
{
TestDispatcher1D<16> t;
t.f(16);
}
{
TestDispatcher1D<16>t;
t.f(0);
}
{
TestDispatcher2D<16,16>t;
t.f(8,8);
}
}
在 gcc 4.1.1 上编译此程序时,出现以下错误:
t.cpp: In member function 'int TestDispatcher2D::f(int, int) [with int M = 16, int N = 16]': t.cpp:63: instantiated from here t.cpp:40: error: no match for call to '(TestDispatcher2D) (int&, int&)' t.cpp:63: instantiated from here t.cpp:43: error: no match for call to '(TestDispatcher2D) (int&, int&)' t.cpp:63: instantiated from here t.cpp:47: error: no match for call to '(TestDispatcher2D) (int&, int&)'
显然,当我尝试创建递归对象时,编译器不会将此视为实例化新模板的请求。
有什么建议么?
I am attempting to write a dynamic dispatcher for a function that's templated on integer values (not on types). While I could either write a code generator or use a big macro chain to create the dispatcher source, it seems that a templated solution would be more elegant.
I've stripped down my dispatcher to a simple form (which doesn't actually do any dispatching):
// works fine with full template specialization
template <int N>
struct TestDispatcher1D {
int f(int n) {
if (n == N) return n; // replace me with actual dispatch
TestDispatcher1D<N-1> t;
return t.f(n);
}
};
template<>
struct TestDispatcher1D<-1> {
int f(int n) { return -1; }
};
// partial template specialization is problematic
template <int M, int N>
struct TestDispatcher2D {
int f(int m, int n);
};
template<int M>
struct TestDispatcher2D<M,-1> {
int f(int m, int n) { return -1; }
};
template<int N>
struct TestDispatcher2D<-1,N> {
int f(int m, int n) { return -1; }
};
template<>
struct TestDispatcher2D<-1,-1> {
int f(int m, int n) { return -1; }
};
template <int M, int N>
int TestDispatcher2D<M,N>::f(int m, int n) {
if ((n == N) && (m == M)) return n + m; // replace me with actual dispatch
if (m < M) {
if (n < N) {
TestDispatcher2D<M-1,N-1> t;
return t(m,n);
} else {
TestDispatcher2D<M-1,N> t;
return t(m,n);
}
} else {
TestDispatcher2D<M,N-1> t;
return t(m,n);
}
}
// test code
void testIt() {
{
TestDispatcher1D<16> t;
t.f(16);
}
{
TestDispatcher1D<16>t;
t.f(0);
}
{
TestDispatcher2D<16,16>t;
t.f(8,8);
}
}
When compiling this on gcc 4.1.1, I get the following errors:
t.cpp: In member function 'int TestDispatcher2D::f(int, int) [with int M = 16, int N = 16]': t.cpp:63: instantiated from here t.cpp:40: error: no match for call to '(TestDispatcher2D) (int&, int&)' t.cpp:63: instantiated from here t.cpp:43: error: no match for call to '(TestDispatcher2D) (int&, int&)' t.cpp:63: instantiated from here t.cpp:47: error: no match for call to '(TestDispatcher2D) (int&, int&)'
Apparently, when I try to create the recursive objects, the compiler isn't treating this as a request to instantiate a new template.
Any suggestions?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
您根本没有在递归调用中调用
f()
函数,而是尝试“调用对象”:您写道:
但您想要:
You're simply not calling the
f()
function in your recursive call, you're trying to "call the object":You write:
But you want: