Since you're basing your work on the original LGPL work, it seems to me that your work is a derivative of the original, and so section 2 of the license applies: Your code needs to be LGPL or, at your option, GPL. (The wording is different in versions 2 and 3, but it's the same section.) But I'm just a programmer, so what do I know? You're asking a question about the law, so your best course of action is to ask a lawyer.
发布评论
评论（2）
由于您的工作基于原始 LGPL 工作，在我看来，您的工作是原始工作的衍生品，因此许可证的第 2 部分适用：您的代码需要是 LGPL 或，由您选择，GPL。 （版本2和版本3的措辞不同，但是是同一部分。）但我只是一个程序员，所以我知道什么？ 您要问的是有关法律的问题，因此您最好的做法是询问律师。
Since you're basing your work on the original LGPL work, it seems to me that your work is a derivative of the original, and so section 2 of the license applies: Your code needs to be LGPL or, at your option, GPL. (The wording is different in versions 2 and 3, but it's the same section.) But I'm just a programmer, so what do I know? You're asking a question about the law, so your best course of action is to ask a lawyer.
我相信你必须使用LGPL：
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License# Differences_from_the_GPL
这取决于您的移植是否是衍生作品（通常移植==衍生作品）。
I believe you have to use LGPL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License#Differences_from_the_GPL
It depends on whether your port is a derivative work (generally port == derivative work).