Tell them if they not decide to, then in one hour you start to kill hostages every five minutes 10 at the time...
But more serious do the meeting with management or write some kind of request and show what time consumption it takes to use disintegrated system, and how powerfull and underused newly bought system is, but before do soem analyses if system does really fit all current ne4eds. But be carefull with your words and names,. If it really comes out that company got underused equipmentsoftware which got negative impact on productivity and information flow in company, and it means less of valuable work even heads can fall for this. It all depend how serious is your company in that cases.
Be aware that it would be not quire fluent process to switch frome one soft yo another, people got own habbits and things that they are used to so you will have to do this in some steps which include graduall introducing people to new system
这就是我在以前的公司中引入单元测试和 Wiki 的方式。 当结果开始显示时，人们很快就会想要参与其中。
If you already have the VSTS licenses then why does your team management need to sign off on anything? Start the features amongst your team for small areas and gradually ramp it up. Would you ask management to sign off on which text editor you use?
Management have a basic fear of anything that in any way may disrupt productivity, and rabid adoration for anything that increases productivity at no risk to themselves. Start small and let the results sell themselves.
This is how I've introduced both Unit Testing and Wikis at previous companies. When the results begin to show people quickly want to get involved.
发布评论
评论（2）
告诉他们，如果他们不决定这样做，那么在一小时内，你开始每五分钟 10 次杀死人质……
但更严肃的是与管理层开会或写某种请求并显示使用时需要花费多少时间解体的系统，以及新购买的系统有多强大和未充分利用，但在之前，他们会分析系统是否确实适合当前的所有需求。 但要小心你的用词和名字。 如果事实证明公司的设备软件没有得到充分利用，这会对公司的生产力和信息流产生负面影响，这意味着有价值的工作会减少，甚至连头脑也会因此而陷入困境。 这完全取决于您的公司在这种情况下的严重程度。
请注意，从一种软件切换到另一种软件并不需要流畅的过程，人们有自己的习惯和习惯，因此您必须分步骤执行此操作，包括逐步向人们介绍新系统
Tell them if they not decide to, then in one hour you start to kill hostages every five minutes 10 at the time...
But more serious do the meeting with management or write some kind of request and show what time consumption it takes to use disintegrated system, and how powerfull and underused newly bought system is, but before do soem analyses if system does really fit all current ne4eds. But be carefull with your words and names,. If it really comes out that company got underused equipmentsoftware which got negative impact on productivity and information flow in company, and it means less of valuable work even heads can fall for this. It all depend how serious is your company in that cases.
Be aware that it would be not quire fluent process to switch frome one soft yo another, people got own habbits and things that they are used to so you will have to do this in some steps which include graduall introducing people to new system
如果您已经拥有 VSTS 许可证，那么为什么您的团队管理层需要签署任何内容？ 在您的团队中开始针对小范围的功能，然后逐步扩大规模。 您会要求管理层批准您使用的文本编辑器吗？
管理层对任何可能以任何方式破坏生产力的事物都抱有基本的恐惧，而对任何能够提高生产力而又不给自己带来风险的事物都狂热崇拜。 从小事做起，让结果自我推销。
这就是我在以前的公司中引入单元测试和 Wiki 的方式。 当结果开始显示时，人们很快就会想要参与其中。
If you already have the VSTS licenses then why does your team management need to sign off on anything? Start the features amongst your team for small areas and gradually ramp it up. Would you ask management to sign off on which text editor you use?
Management have a basic fear of anything that in any way may disrupt productivity, and rabid adoration for anything that increases productivity at no risk to themselves. Start small and let the results sell themselves.
This is how I've introduced both Unit Testing and Wikis at previous companies. When the results begin to show people quickly want to get involved.