Google Gears 真的是一个长期解决方案吗？
我正在考虑在项目中使用 Gears，但我对此心存疑虑。
您认为 Gears 真的会（或已经）被社区接受为实现其目的的最先进的解决方案吗？
虽然 Gears 看起来很棒，但我认为社区有点害怕使用它。
你怎么看待这件事？
I am thinking about using Gears in a project, but I have doubts about it.
Do you think that Gears will really be (or already were) accepted by the community as the state-of-art solution for what it purposes?
Although Gears seems to be awesome, I think that the community is kind of scared to use it.
What do you think about it?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（6）
如果 Google 决定弃用 Gears，HTML 5 中的客户端存储将提供 Gears 的升级路径。 有一篇关于 Google 使用抽象层的有趣文章，以便 支持 HTML 5 客户端存储的浏览器不需要 Gears。
The client side storage in HTML 5 will provide an upgrade path from Gears, should Google ever decide to deprecate Gears. There's an interesting article about Google using an abstraction layer so that Gears is not required on browsers supporting HTML 5 client-side storage.
Google Gears 并不是一个长期解决方案。 2010 年 2 月 19 日，Google 宣布 Gears 即将停产，他们相信正确的解决方案是通过符合标准的选项，例如 HTML5。
Google Gears is not a long-term solution. On February 19, 2010, Google announced that Gears is being discontinued, and that they believe the correct solution is through standards-complaint options such as HTML5.
Gears 有 SQL 引擎 (SQLite)、脚本 (Javascript) 和良好的互联网支持。
事实上，我在市场上没有看到类似的东西。
如果 Google 设法将 Gears 推向小型设备（SQLite 和 javascrpt 都可以工作），那么就有可能将 Gears 定位为严肃的客户端框架。
他们似乎并不着急。 说不出为什么。
Gears have SQL engine (SQLite), with scripting (Javascript), and good internet support.
In fact, I don't see anything like it on the market.
And there is the potential to position Gears as serious client side framework, if Google manage to push Gears on small devices (on which both SQLite and javascrpt allready work).
They don't seem to hurry. Can't tell why.
谷歌在其上投入了大量时间，并将其集成到他们的一些网络应用程序中。 我想它会在这里停留一段时间，但这样的事情总是存在风险。
Google has invested a lot of time in it and has also integrated it into some of their web apps. I imagine its here to stay for a while but then there is always risk involved with stuff like this.
谷歌即将推出基于 Gears 构建的“离线 GMail”。 考虑到 GMail 的市场份额，我预计它会成为 Gears 采用的杀手级应用程序。
但很难做出预测，尤其是对未来的预测。 如果可以的话，您可能想等待，看看离线 GMail 是如何流行的。
Google is about to roll out "offline GMail", which is built on Gears. Given the market share of GMail, I'd expect that to be the killer app for Gears adoption.
But it's hard to make predictions, especially about the future. You might want to wait, if you can afford to, and see how offline GMail catches on.
任何平台都存在风险，但至少在这个平台上，谷歌正在吃自己的狗粮。 即，gmail 离线需要它，这是您离线使用 google 文档的方式。
我认为从持续支持的角度来看，您使用 Gears 可能与使用大多数其他框架一样安全。 如果它在当前状态下满足您的需求，那么听起来很合适。
There is always risk with any platform, but at least with this one google are eating their own dog food. I.e. It is required for gmail offline, it is the way you'll take google docs offline.
I think you're probably as safe with Gears from a continued support perspective as you are with most other frameworks. If it meets your needs as it is in its current state, it sounds like a good fit.