该工具包与 MS Office 2007/2010/2013 配合良好。 在我们的场景中，报告是使用我们定制开发的报告引擎在服务器上集中生成的，该引擎使用 Docentric api 调用。 由于Docentric 使用OpenXML，因此服务器上不需要安装Word。
我们有数百种不同的模板，它们是普通的 Word 文档，并使用占位符进行了增强，Docentric 在报告创建过程中在运行时识别并填充数据。
我们广泛使用的其他功能包括表格（包括嵌套表格）、图像、图表、条件内容和页眉/页脚动态内容。
Our team is using Docentric Toolkit Professional Edition. One of the most important reasons for our decision was also it's relatively affordable price for teams of up to 5 developers.
The toolkit works nice with MS Office 2007/2010/2013. In our scenario, reports are produced centrally on the server, using our custom developed reporting engine, which uses Docentric api calls. Because Docentric uses OpenXML, no Word installation is needed on the server.
We have several hundreds different templates, which are ordinary Word documents, enhanced with placeholders which Docentric recognizes and fills with data at runtime during report creation.
Other features which we are using extensively are tables (included nested ones), images, graphs, conditional content and Header/Footer dynamic content.
TX Text Control 有一个精简版，但它不具备完整版的所有功能。 Express 是免费的，我也用过它，如果您的唯一目的是创建一个文字处理程序，它不会提供所有功能。 与 Aspose.Words 一样，购买完整版非常昂贵（2,398.00 美元！），在我看来，这是一种诈骗。 正在评估免费版本的优缺点 缺点：
免费版本中没有拼写检查 无法在免费版本
中读取 .docx 或 .doc 免费版本中
没有页眉、页脚或可拖动文本框（如 Word 中的那样）
优点：
免费
分页符
基本文档编辑功能
我们公司使用过它一段时间，但厌倦了功能的缺乏，最终放弃了它。
TX Text Control has an express version, but it doesn't have all the features the full version has. The express is free, and I've used it, and if your sole purpose is to create a word processor, it will not provide all of the features. Like Aspose.Words, buying the full version is REALLY expensive ($2,398.00!), and in my opinion, a ripoff. The pros and cons are evaluating the free version Cons:
No spell check in the free version
Cannot read .docx or .doc in the free version
No headers, footers, or dragable textboxes (like there are in Word) in the free version
Pros:
Free
Page breaks
Basic Document editing features
Our company used it for a bit, but got sick of the lack of features, and ended up just ditching it.
发布评论
评论（4）
我们的团队正在使用 Docentric Toolkit 专业版。 我们做出决定的最重要原因之一是，对于最多 5 名开发人员的团队来说，它的价格相对实惠。
该工具包与 MS Office 2007/2010/2013 配合良好。 在我们的场景中，报告是使用我们定制开发的报告引擎在服务器上集中生成的，该引擎使用 Docentric api 调用。 由于Docentric 使用OpenXML，因此服务器上不需要安装Word。
我们有数百种不同的模板，它们是普通的 Word 文档，并使用占位符进行了增强，Docentric 在报告创建过程中在运行时识别并填充数据。
我们广泛使用的其他功能包括表格（包括嵌套表格）、图像、图表、条件内容和页眉/页脚动态内容。
Our team is using Docentric Toolkit Professional Edition. One of the most important reasons for our decision was also it's relatively affordable price for teams of up to 5 developers.
The toolkit works nice with MS Office 2007/2010/2013. In our scenario, reports are produced centrally on the server, using our custom developed reporting engine, which uses Docentric api calls. Because Docentric uses OpenXML, no Word installation is needed on the server.
We have several hundreds different templates, which are ordinary Word documents, enhanced with placeholders which Docentric recognizes and fills with data at runtime during report creation.
Other features which we are using extensively are tables (included nested ones), images, graphs, conditional content and Header/Footer dynamic content.
我不知道它是否适合您的目的，但您可能想看看 SourceForge 上的 b2xtranslator 项目：
I don't know if it's suited for your purpose but you might want to have a look at the b2xtranslator project on SourceForge:
如果 Java 是一个选项（或偏好），您可以尝试 docx4j
If Java is an option (or a preference), you could try docx4j
TX Text Control 有一个精简版，但它不具备完整版的所有功能。 Express 是免费的，我也用过它，如果您的唯一目的是创建一个文字处理程序，它不会提供所有功能。 与 Aspose.Words 一样，购买完整版非常昂贵（2,398.00 美元！），在我看来，这是一种诈骗。
正在评估免费版本的优缺点
缺点：
优点：
我们公司使用过它一段时间，但厌倦了功能的缺乏，最终放弃了它。
TX Text Control has an express version, but it doesn't have all the features the full version has. The express is free, and I've used it, and if your sole purpose is to create a word processor, it will not provide all of the features. Like Aspose.Words, buying the full version is REALLY expensive ($2,398.00!), and in my opinion, a ripoff.
The pros and cons are evaluating the free version
Cons:
Pros:
Our company used it for a bit, but got sick of the lack of features, and ended up just ditching it.