SQL Server 中的伪随机可重复排序(不是 NEWID() 也不是 RAND())
我想以可重复的方式对结果进行随机排序,以用于分页等目的。 因为这个 NEWID() 太随机了,无法重新获得相同的结果。 按兰德(种子)排序将是理想的,因为使用相同的种子会产生相同的随机集合。 不幸的是, Rand() 状态每行都会重置,有人有解决方案吗?
declare @seed as int;
set @seed = 1000;
create table temp (
id int,
date datetime)
insert into temp (id, date) values (1,'20090119')
insert into temp (id, date) values (2,'20090118')
insert into temp (id, date) values (3,'20090117')
insert into temp (id, date) values (4,'20090116')
insert into temp (id, date) values (5,'20090115')
insert into temp (id, date) values (6,'20090114')
-- re-seeds for every item
select *, RAND(), RAND(id+@seed) as r from temp order by r
--1 2009-01-19 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732224964471124
--2 2009-01-18 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732243597442382
--3 2009-01-17 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.73226223041364
--4 2009-01-16 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732280863384898
--5 2009-01-15 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732299496356156
--6 2009-01-14 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732318129327415
-- Note how the last column is +=~0.00002
drop table temp
-- interestingly this works:
select RAND(@seed), RAND()
--0.732206331499865 0.306382810665955
请注意,我尝试了 Rand(ID) 但结果只是排序。 显然 Rand(n) < 兰特(n+1)
I would like to randomly sort a result in a repeatable fashion for purposes such as paging. For this NEWID() is too random in that the same results cannot be re-obtained. Order by Rand(seed) would be ideal as with the same seed the same random collection would result. Unfortunately, the Rand() state resets with every row, does anyone have a solution?
declare @seed as int;
set @seed = 1000;
create table temp (
id int,
date datetime)
insert into temp (id, date) values (1,'20090119')
insert into temp (id, date) values (2,'20090118')
insert into temp (id, date) values (3,'20090117')
insert into temp (id, date) values (4,'20090116')
insert into temp (id, date) values (5,'20090115')
insert into temp (id, date) values (6,'20090114')
-- re-seeds for every item
select *, RAND(), RAND(id+@seed) as r from temp order by r
--1 2009-01-19 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732224964471124
--2 2009-01-18 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732243597442382
--3 2009-01-17 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.73226223041364
--4 2009-01-16 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732280863384898
--5 2009-01-15 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732299496356156
--6 2009-01-14 00:00:00.000 0.277720118060575 0.732318129327415
-- Note how the last column is +=~0.00002
drop table temp
-- interestingly this works:
select RAND(@seed), RAND()
--0.732206331499865 0.306382810665955
Note, I tried Rand(ID) but that just turns out to be sorted. Apparently Rand(n) < Rand(n+1)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(7)
基于 gkrogers 哈希建议,这非常有效。 对性能有什么想法吗?
编辑:注意,如果使用动态 SQL,则在查询中使用的 @seed 声明可以替换为参数或常量 int。 (不需要以 TSQL 方式声明 @int)
Building off of gkrogers hash suggestion this works great. Any thoughts on performance?
EDIT: Note, the declaration of @seed as it's use in the query could be replace with a parameter or with a constant int if dynamic SQL is used. (declaration of @int in a TSQL fashion is not necessary)
您可以使用每行中的值来重新计算 rand 函数:
添加 ID 可确保为每行重新播种 rand。 但对于种子值,您将始终返回相同的行序列(前提是表不更改)
You can use a value from each row to re-evaluate the rand function:
adding the ID ensures that the rand is reseeded for each row. But for a value of seed you will always get back the same sequence of rows (provided that the table does not change)
创建哈希可能比创建种子随机数更耗时。
为了获得 RAND([seed]) 输出的更多变化,您还需要使 [seed] 发生显着变化。 可能比如......
使用常量可以确保您所要求的可复制性。 但如果您希望表变得足够大,请小心 (id * 9999) 导致溢出的结果......
Creating a hash can be much more time consuming than creating a seeded random number.
To get more variation in the ourput of RAND([seed]) you need to make the [seed] vary significantly too. Possibly such as...
Using a constant ensures the replicability you asked for. But be careful of the result of (id * 9999) causing an overflow if you expect your table to get big enough...
这种作品。 尽管 checksum() 的输出对我来说看起来并不那么随机。 MSDN 文档 指出:
但可能会更快。
This kind of works. Although the output from checksum() does not look all that random to me. The MSDN Documentation states:
But may be it faster.
经过一些阅读后,这是一种可以接受的方法。
表达式中包含 id 会导致每一行都重新计算。 但将其乘以 0 可确保它不会影响 rand 的结果。
这是多么可怕的做事方式啊!
After doing some reading this is an accepted method.
Having id in the expression causes it to be reevaluated every row. But multiplying it by 0 ensures that it doesnt not affect the outcome of rand.
What a horrible way of doing things!
这在过去对我来说效果很好,它可以应用于任何表(只需添加 ORDER BY 子句):
This has worked well for me in the past, and it can be applied to any table (just bolt on the ORDER BY clause):