当您在名称后添加点时显示成员的 IDE 弹出窗口的通用术语是什么?

发布于 2024-07-11 18:20:00 字数 254 浏览 6 评论 0原文

我正在写一篇学术论文,我需要参考大多数 OO 语言的 IDE 中存在的一项功能,您可以在源代码中键入对象名称,添加点,然后会弹出一些内容并让您选择成员。

我正在寻找一个通用的(不是 IDE 特定术语,尽管我也有兴趣了解这些),它特指此功能和弹出窗口,而不是所有支持功能(例如,“内容辅助”或类似的东西) 。 该术语应与大多数 IDE 中的成员列表或大纲视图区分开来。

我的论文涉及 Eclipse 和 Java,但我想知道是否有一个被广泛接受的术语。

I am writing an academic paper and I need to refer to a feature that exists in most IDEs for OO languages, where you type an objects name in the source code, add the dot, and something pops up and lets you pick members.

I am looking for a general (not IDE specific term, though I am also interested in knowing those), and that refers specifically to this functionality and popup rather than to all the support features (e.g., "Content assist" or something like that). The term should be distinguishable from the member list or outline views in most IDEs.

My paper is concerned with Eclipse and Java, but I am wondering if there is a well-accepted term.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(6

三寸金莲 2024-07-18 18:20:00

intellisense 是您要查找的内容的 Microsoft 采用名称:)

AutoComplete 是在非 Microsoft 财产的其他程序中使用的术语

intellisense is the microsoft adopted name for what you are looking for :)

AutoComplete is the term that is used in other programs non-Microsoft property

药祭#氼 2024-07-18 18:20:00

Intellisense 是 Microsoft 的称呼,而且似乎已得到普遍使用。 “自动完成”也很好用。

Intellisense is what Microsoft calls it, and that seems to be in general use. "Autocomplete" works fine too.

謸气贵蔟 2024-07-18 18:20:00

“自动完成”是更通用的术语。 我会避免使用特定于供应商的术语。

(此外,在不太可能发生的情况下,不知道该术语的读者更有可能从上下文中弄清楚“自动完成”的含义。“Intellisense”就像“Tide”或“Pledge”;你'永远不会从名字中猜出它是什么;-)

"Autocompletion" is the more generic term. I'd avoid vendor-specific jargon.

(In addition, in the unlikely event, a reader who doesn't know the term is more likely to be able to figure out what "autocompletion" means from context. "Intellisense" is like "Tide" or "Pledge"; you'd never guess what it is from the name. ;-)

葬シ愛 2024-07-18 18:20:00

我认为自动完成功能并没有完全捕捉到这一点。 请参阅 Joel 关于软件的讨论:

http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/ default.asp?joel.3.457350.17

我认为“内容辅助”或类似的内容在学术论文中是可以接受的。 正如该论坛的另一位发帖者指出的那样,我认为 Intellisense 正变得很像 Kleenex 或“google”(动词形式)。

I don't think AutoComplete quite captures it. See this discussion on Joel on Software:

http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?joel.3.457350.17

I think "content assistance" or something like that would be acceptable in an academic paper. As another poster in that forum pointed out, I think Intellisense is becoming much like Kleenex or perhaps "google" (verb form).

无需解释 2024-07-18 18:20:00

我认为“Intellisense”这个术语可能是传播最广泛的,只需几分钟就可以理解。 我会同意的。

在使用 Visual Studio 之前,我最熟悉的术语是“代码洞察”,它也很容易理解。

I think the term "Intellisense" is probably the most wide spread and only takes a couple of ticks to understand. I'd go with that.

Until I worked with Visual Studio, the term I was most familiar with was "Code Insight", which again is easy to understand.

风吹短裙飘 2024-07-18 18:20:00

如果您指的是弹出的小列表,我通常将其称为自动建议弹出菜单。

If you are referring to the small list that pops up, I usually refer to it as the autosuggest popup menu.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文