虽然我从未特别使用过 Manco，但我使用过其他许可选项，我唯一的建议是，如果您决定添加许可，请坚持最低限度 - 在这种情况下，只需密钥解锁，或者他们的基本套餐。 当您开始添加激活 Web 服务，然后不允许客户将其软件从一台 PC 移动到另一台 PC 时，您就会开始给已经为您的软件付费的普通用户带来不便，这绝不是一件好事。
Is the choice between some kind of enforcement and no enforcement, or are you looking for experience with that particular product?
Though I've never used Manco in particular, I've used other licensing options, and my only suggestion would be that if you decide to add licensing at all, you stick to the bare minimum - in this case, just key unlocking, or their basic package. When you start to add an activation web service, and then you don't let customers move their software from one PC to another, you start to inconvenience regular users who've already paid for your software, and that's never a good thing.
You're right that it will always be cracked anyway, and in the end, you have to do a cost benefit analysis to determine if adding licensing is really worthwhile. The formula looks like this:
If (Purchases from people who wouldn't have paid for the software if you didn't have licensing) - (Lost sales from people who are scared off or have problems and demand a refund because of your licensing) - $80 > 0
then add licensing. If it's not (i.e. sales/customers lost > additional purchases), then release it without enforcement, since you're better off that way (you can still release both a time-limited demo, as well as a special purchase-only download on your website)
It looks like they offer a 15-day trial for this product - if it works, it's worth the $80 to you as a developer, but only if it doesn't inconvenience your users at all. If you run into any problems during your trial, you can be sure they'll run into problems too, and it's not worth it.
We are using version 3.3 of this .net licensing product during half of year. I'm not sure how good is the low-price edition ($80). It seems that some features are disabled in it. We are using "Standard Edtion" and "Activation Web Service". This pair work good for us. It's quite stable and guys provide pretty good support. Manco Software announced new version some time ago. We are testing new features currently having in mind to upgrade.
发布评论
评论（2）
是在某种强制执行和不强制执行之间进行选择，还是您正在寻找该特定产品的经验？
虽然我从未特别使用过 Manco，但我使用过其他许可选项，我唯一的建议是，如果您决定添加许可，请坚持最低限度 - 在这种情况下，只需密钥解锁，或者他们的基本套餐。 当您开始添加激活 Web 服务，然后不允许客户将其软件从一台 PC 移动到另一台 PC 时，您就会开始给已经为您的软件付费的普通用户带来不便，这绝不是一件好事。
你是对的，无论如何它总是会被破解，最后，你必须进行成本效益分析，以确定添加许可是否真的值得。 公式如下所示：
如果（如果您没有许可，则不会为软件付费的人购买）-（由于您的许可而被吓跑或遇到问题并要求退款的人造成的销售损失） - 80 美元> 0
然后添加许可。 如果不是（即销售/客户流失>额外购买），则在不强制执行的情况下发布它，因为这样你会更好（你仍然可以发布限时演示，以及仅限特殊购买的下载）在你的网站上）
看起来他们为这个产品提供了 15 天的试用 - 如果它有效，那么对于作为开发人员的你来说 80 美元是值得的，但前提是它根本不会给你的用户带来不便。 如果你在试用过程中遇到任何问题，你可以肯定他们也会遇到问题，这是不值得的。
PS：埃里克·辛克在他的书中谈到了这一点。
Is the choice between some kind of enforcement and no enforcement, or are you looking for experience with that particular product?
Though I've never used Manco in particular, I've used other licensing options, and my only suggestion would be that if you decide to add licensing at all, you stick to the bare minimum - in this case, just key unlocking, or their basic package. When you start to add an activation web service, and then you don't let customers move their software from one PC to another, you start to inconvenience regular users who've already paid for your software, and that's never a good thing.
You're right that it will always be cracked anyway, and in the end, you have to do a cost benefit analysis to determine if adding licensing is really worthwhile. The formula looks like this:
If (Purchases from people who wouldn't have paid for the software if you didn't have licensing) - (Lost sales from people who are scared off or have problems and demand a refund because of your licensing) - $80 > 0
then add licensing. If it's not (i.e. sales/customers lost > additional purchases), then release it without enforcement, since you're better off that way (you can still release both a time-limited demo, as well as a special purchase-only download on your website)
It looks like they offer a 15-day trial for this product - if it works, it's worth the $80 to you as a developer, but only if it doesn't inconvenience your users at all. If you run into any problems during your trial, you can be sure they'll run into problems too, and it's not worth it.
PS: Eric Sink talks about this in his book.
我们在半年中使用了该 .net 许可产品的 3.3 版本。 我不确定低价版（80 美元）有多好。 似乎有些功能被禁用了。 我们使用“标准版”和“激活网络服务”。 这对组合对我们来说很有用。 它非常稳定，人们提供了很好的支持。 Manco Software 不久前发布了新版本。 我们正在测试新功能，目前正在考虑升级。
We are using version 3.3 of this .net licensing product during half of year. I'm not sure how good is the low-price edition ($80). It seems that some features are disabled in it. We are using "Standard Edtion" and "Activation Web Service". This pair work good for us. It's quite stable and guys provide pretty good support. Manco Software announced new version some time ago. We are testing new features currently having in mind to upgrade.