您如何管理和组织您的文件? (脚本、存储库、下载、pdf 等)

发布于 2024-07-11 01:40:22 字数 1542 浏览 5 评论 0原文

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(6

戏剧牡丹亭 2024-07-18 01:40:22

我采用深层层次结构方法。 最大的问题是我的电子邮件存档,其中许多邮件需要多个分类,但只能存储在一个地方。 我们迁移到 Notes,这意味着长期记忆会丢失 - 我讨厌这一点。

我尝试按照项目来组织内容——从最宽松的意义上来说。 我有顶级目录,例如:

  • bin - 可执行命令
  • inc - 标头(我经常用 C 编程)
  • lib - 库(带有不同库源的子目录)
  • src - 主源代码存档(无数的子目录,大约两到三层深,忽略像 RCS 子目录这样的人工制品)
  • 等 - 主要是配置文件和相关脚本
  • tmp - 名义上是临时文件(最古老的居民已经过了十年,但那是从其他地方导入的;我创建的最古老的居民或从 2000 年底下载的日期)

然后我有一个半目的子目录的杂项,例如:

  • 工作 - 充满与工作相关的子目录
  • pdf - 子目录中充满 PDF 文件
  • 论文 - 充满非 PDF file
  • doc - 更多文档(需要处理这一点)

由于这台机器距离我 1500 英里,并且运行 Solaris 10,我不确定如何使用 Google Desktop 等工具来管理它。

在我使用的 Windows 笔记本电脑上,我有一个 C:\Fileing Cabinet\ 目录,该目录下有一个子目录层次结构。 我不喜欢 Windows 将文件分散的方式; 我更喜欢按照我想要的方式负责分散我自己的文件。

我家里的 Mac 与我的主要工作机器类似 - 减去工作特定的东西。

I go for the deep hierarchy approach. The biggest problem was my email archive, where many messages needed more than one classification, but could only be stored in one place. We got migrated to Notes, which means that long-term memory is lost - I hate that.

I try to keep stuff organized by projects - in the loosest sense of the term. I have top-level directories like:

  • bin - executable commands
  • inc - headers (I program in C a lot)
  • lib - libraries (with sub-directories for the source of different libraries)
  • src - main source archive (a myriad sub-directories, some two or three levels deep, ignoring artefacts like RCS sub-directories)
  • etc - mainly configuration files and associated scripts
  • tmp - nominally temporary files (the oldest resident has passed the decade mark, but that was imported from elsewhere; the oldest residents I created or downloaded date from late 2000)

I then have a miscellany of semi-purposeful sub-directories, such as:

  • work - laden with sub-directories related to work
  • pdf - full of PDF files in sub-directories
  • papers - full of non-PDF file
  • doc - more documentation (need to work on this bit)

Since this machine is physically 1500 miles from me, and is running Solaris 10, I'm not sure how I'd use a tool such as Google Desktop to manage it.

On the Windows laptop I use, I have a C:\Filing Cabinet\ directory which has a hierarchy of sub-directories under it. I don't like the way Windows scatters my files around; I much prefer to be in charge of scattering my own files around the way I want to.

My Mac at home parallels my main work machine - minus the work-specific stuff.

坏尐絯 2024-07-18 01:40:22

我强烈推荐 PersonalBrain(参见 thebrain.com),以获取不易适应严格层次结构的参考资料、URL、注释等(就我而言,这是大多数事情 - 我讨厌深层层次结构)。 它可以在 MacOS、Windows 和 Linux 上运行,而且免费版本的功能非常强大(尽管我确实选择了“核心”版本,因为它具有我喜欢的附加功能)。

它还可以链接到操作系统文件夹和操作系统管理的文件,因此您可以将旧式文件夹与您在 PersonalBrain 本身中归档的内容混合和匹配。 然而,它对命令行事情并没有真正的帮助。

我还不知道如何处理的东西,我会以一种名为“未归档”的想法进行归档,然后时不时地对在那里找到的东西进行分类。

我还在 Mac OS X 上使用 voodopad(一种桌面 wiki),但任何桌面 wiki 都可以(tomboy、tiddlywiki 等)...PersonalBrain 也可以被视为一种 wiki。

I highly recommend PersonalBrain (see thebrain.com) for references, URLs, notes etc that don't easily fit into rigid hierarchies (which in my case is most things - I hate deep hierarchies). It runs on MacOS, Windows and Linux, and the free version is pretty functional (though I did cough up for the 'core' version as it has additional features that I like).

It can also link into OS folders and OS managed files, so you can mix and match old school folders with things that you file in PersonalBrain itself. It doesn't really help with command line things, however.

Stuff I don't know what to do with yet, I file under a thought called 'unfiled', and then from time to time I categorise things I find there.

I also use voodopad on Mac OS X (a kind of desktop wiki), but any desktop wiki will do instead (tomboy, tiddlywiki, etc)...also PersonalBrain can also be looked on as a sort of wiki.

逐鹿 2024-07-18 01:40:22

来组织文件

  • 一种可能的方法是按项目(如乔纳森的建议:用于共同目的的“连贯的文件组”的宽松术语)
  • 打包类型 ,这意味着:
    • 简单的文件集合(松散且自定义的组织),或者
    • 预定义的目录结构(每个项目的结构始终相同,非常适合开发项目),或者
    • zip 文件(方便同步/备份)

我有一个区域我将所有重要文件/项目放在压缩文件中,以便在不同计算机之间将该目录与其镜像同步(压缩文件意味着要同步的文件更少,意味着同步过程更快。也适用于备份)

One possible approach is to organize your files:

  • by projects (like Jonathan's suggestion: loose term for "coherent groups of files" for a common purpose)
  • by packaging type, meaning:
    • simple collection of files (loose and custom organization), or
    • predefined structure of directories (always the same structure for every project, works well for development projects), or
    • zip files (for easy synchronization / backup)

I have a zone where I put all important files/projects in compressed file in order to synchronize that directory with its mirror between my different computers (compressed files means less files to synchronize, means a quicker synchronization process. Works for backup too)

夏日浅笑〃 2024-07-18 01:40:22

我发现计算机和硬盘驱动器的速度是如此之快,以至于我只需将所有内容都放入 c:\ 或 ~/ 中,我就不必走很远才能找到任何东西。 但这就是我。 大多数人可能会不同意。

I have found that computers and hard drives are so fast that I just throw everything in c:\ or ~/ and I never have to go far to find anything. But that's me. Most will probably disagree.

策马西风 2024-07-18 01:40:22

我没有使用庞大的文件夹层次结构,而是对文件进行分类并将它们组织到以下文件夹之一:

工作、个人、存档、杂项

,然后使用 Google 桌面 来管理我的文件。

Instead of having a huge hierarchies of folders, I categorize my files and organize them in either one of the following folders:

Work, Personal, Archive, Misc

And then use Google Desktop to manage my files.

满栀 2024-07-18 01:40:22

我不确定这是否能完全解决您的问题,但我希望它能在很大程度上为您节省一些时间。

我创建了一个以类似方式工作的应用程序。 应用程序 Sorter 的功能是按扩展名(即 pdf)对文件进行分组,但与 docx 分开。 还有一个附加选项,可以将文档分组在一起,但与视频和音频分开。 对于您的情况来说,好处是您可以确定文件的目的地; 另外,它还有一个递归函数,可以检查子文件夹及其子文件夹,并相对于文件的初始位置对文件进行排序/分组。 尝试一下,看看是否有帮助。

I am not sure if this will completely solve your problem but I am hoping it will save you some time for the most part.

I have created an application which works in a similar manner. The application Sorter functions by grouping files by their extension ie pdf together but separate from docx. There is also an added option which can group documents together but separate from videos and audios. The good thing, for your case, is that you can determine the destination of the files; plus it has a recursive function which checks into subfolders and their subfolders and sorts/groups the files relative to their initial location. Try it out and see if it can help.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文