云计算需要一些法规吗？
我最近参与了几个云计算平台。
首先请注意，我并不是要批评任何平台。
云计算涉及面很广，但为了让我的观点简单易懂。 让我想出一个非常简单的场景，那就是托管在云上的数据存储服务。 如果您使用任何存储服务，例如 Amazon EC2、SQL Data Service(SDS)、Salesforce.com 服务。
如果您想使用任何此类数据存储服务平台，所有此类服务的目标都是相同的，那就是按需提供所请求的数据。 无需争论它如何存储、存储在何处以及谁在维护它等......（所有云好东西）
现在我关心的领域是 ANSI-SQL 监管平台供应商确保他们在所有产品中遵循类似语言的方式他们不是在各地监管类似的概念吗 服务供应商？
为什么没有这样的举措？
任何想法表示赞赏
I was involved in couple of cloud computing platform recently.
First of all please note that I am not trying to criticize any platform.
Cloud computing is large area but to make my point simple and understandable. Let me come up with very simple scenario and that is data storage services hosted on the cloud.
If you take any storage service like Amazon EC2, SQL Data Service(SDS), Salesforce.com services.
If you want to consume any of such data storage service platform goal of all such service are same and that is to serve requested data on demand. Without warring about how it store and where it stored and who is maintaining it etc... (all cloud goodies)
Now my area of concern is the way ANSI-SQL regulated platform venders to make sure they follow similar language across all the product can’t they regulate similar concept across
service providers?
Why no such initiatives??
Any thoughts appreciated
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
在我看来，您似乎担心云计算的供应商锁定。 我可能很天真，但我通常会选择技术，然后寻找能够提供这些技术的云供应商。 如果我的目标是“一次编写，随处运行”，我就必须选择能够尽可能实现这一目标的技术。
随着发展速度相当快，我真的认为标准化委员会将很难跟上。 ANSI-SQL已经有20多年的历史了。 在我看来，你在我们还不知道云的用途之前就已经要求标准化了......
It seems to me like you're worried about vendor lock-in with cloud computing. I may be naive but I would normally choose technologies and then go look for cloud vendors that'd be able to deliver these technologies. And if I was aiming for a "write once run anywhere approach" I'd have to select technology that'd make this as realistic as possible.
With the fairly rapid speed of development I really think standardization committees would struggle to keep up. ANSI-SQL has had 20 + years of history. It seems to me like you're requesting for standardization long before we even know what the cloud is up to....
我认为这个新兴的云计算计划还太年轻，还不足以制定标准。
服务提供商现在只担心冲入市场，而不是互操作性和标准。
稍后，当情况更加确定时，可能会出现一些共同的指导方针。 但还有很长的路要走。
I think that this emerging cloud computing initiative is just too young in order to have standards.
Service providers right now just worry about rushing into the market, rather than interoperability and standards.
Later on, when the situation is more established, some common guidelines may emerge. But there is still a long way to go.
您似乎专门询问云存储服务，而不是一般的云计算。 因此，您的 Amazon 示例将是 S3，而不是 EC2。
我认为 API 标准化领域还很年轻。 这些服务以排除这种情况的方式来区分自己。 例如，S3 以复杂性换取可扩展性/可靠性/性能：您无法执行复杂的 SQL LIKE 查询。 您可以基于键存储和检索数据块，仅此而已。
我认为，随着此类服务越来越成为主流的做事方式，标准将会出现。 用户希望能够自由地随心所欲地切换提供商、移动数据、测试免费本地存储等。
所使用的 API 均已基于 Web 标准。 制作一个抽象层使它们看起来相同是相当简单的。
You seem to be asking specifically about cloud storage services, rather than cloud computing in general. So your Amazon example would be S3, not EC2.
I think the field is a little young to be standardising on an API just yet. The services differentiate themselves in ways which rule this out. For example, S3 trades sophistication for scalability/reliability/performance: you can't do a complex SQL LIKE query. You can store and retrieve blobs of data based on a key, and that's about it.
I think as such services become more and more the mainstream way to do things, standards will emerge. Users will want the freedom to switch providers on a whim, move their data around, test against free local storage, etc.
The APIs used are all based on Web Standards already. Making an abstraction layer to make them look the same is fairly trivial.