是否可以使用 Rhino Mocks 生成部分存根?

发布于 2024-07-10 12:53:02 字数 1006 浏览 3 评论 0原文

一般来说,我对单元测试和模拟很陌生,我正在尝试为我的一个类设置测试,我想确保从同一类中的另一个方法调用特定方法。 因此,我想使用具体的实现,但模拟其中的一部分。 这可能吗?

public class MyClass
{
  public Accounts[] GetAccounts()
  {
      return GetAccounts(null);
  }

  public Accounts[] GetAccounts(CustomerId id)
  {
      if(id == null)
      {
          // Get all accounts
      }
  }
}

因此,我尝试设置一个存根来调用 GetAccounts() (我想使用具体实现),但我想检查该方法是否调用 GetAccounts(null)。

[Test]
public void GetAccountsTest()
{
  MockRepository mocks = new MockRepository();
  MyClass stub = mocks.Stub();
  using(mocks.Record())
  {
     Expect.Call(() => stub.GetAccounts()).CallOriginalMethod();
     Expect.Call(() => stub.GetAccounts(null));
  }
  mocks.ReplayAll();
  stub.GetAccounts();
  mocks.VerifyAll();
}

问题是,具体类在 CallOriginalMethod() 行上被调用,我希望在调用 Stub.GetAccounts() 时在重放期间调用该类。 因此,在录制期间以及在执行测试时,当我只是想模拟它们时,就会调用实现的具体方法 - 部分正如我所解释的那样。 这是我的误解吗? 我是否应该无法模拟/存根具体类和接口?

我是否需要将 virtual 关键字添加到我想要模拟的方法中?

这可能吗? 我该怎么做呢?

I am new to unittesting and mocking in general and am trying to set up tests for one of my classes where I want to make sure that a particular method is called from another method within the same class. I would therefore like to use the concrete implementation but mock out parts of it. Is this possible?

public class MyClass
{
  public Accounts[] GetAccounts()
  {
      return GetAccounts(null);
  }

  public Accounts[] GetAccounts(CustomerId id)
  {
      if(id == null)
      {
          // Get all accounts
      }
  }
}

I therefore am trying to set up a stub that will get GetAccounts() called (which I want to use the concrete implementation) but I would like to check if that method calls GetAccounts(null).

[Test]
public void GetAccountsTest()
{
  MockRepository mocks = new MockRepository();
  MyClass stub = mocks.Stub();
  using(mocks.Record())
  {
     Expect.Call(() => stub.GetAccounts()).CallOriginalMethod();
     Expect.Call(() => stub.GetAccounts(null));
  }
  mocks.ReplayAll();
  stub.GetAccounts();
  mocks.VerifyAll();
}

Problem is that the concrete class gets called on the CallOriginalMethod() line which I am expecting to get called during the replay when I call stub.GetAccounts().
So both during the recording as well as when I am performing the tests the concrete methods of the implementation are called when I simply want to mock them out - well partially as I have explained. Is this a misunderstanding on my part? Should I not be able to mock/stub concrete classes as well as interfaces?

Do I need to add virtual keyword to the methods I want to be able to mock out?

Is this even possible? How would I do it?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

晨曦÷微暖 2024-07-17 12:53:02

看起来您可能想使用 PartialMock。 它将允许您模拟虚拟方法。

Looks like you might want to use a PartialMock. It will allow you to mock virtual methods.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文