在生产中运行 Apache Geronimo

发布于 2024-07-10 02:14:35 字数 329 浏览 5 评论 0原文

如果您在生产中运行 Apache Geronimo,为什么您选择它而不是其他应用程序服务器?您在生产中运行 Geronimo 的经验是什么?

您能否也分享一下您决定使用哪种 servlet 引擎(Tomcat/Jetty)以及为什么做出这个决定?

更新:到目前为止,这个问题得到了两票赞成和一颗星,但没有答案。 我开始想知道,有人使用 Apache Geronimo 吗? 我的逻辑是,如果您使用 Geronimo 进行开发,那么您也会使用它进行部署。 正确的? 那么,这是否意味着根本没有人在使用 Geronimo?

If you're running Apache Geronimo in production why did you choose it over other application servers and what are your experiences with running Geronimo in production?

Can you also please share what servlet engine you decided to use (Tomcat/Jetty) and why you made this decision?

UPDATE: So far this question got two up-votes and one star but no answer. I'm starting to wonder, is anyone using Apache Geronimo at all? My logic would be, if you use Geronimo for development you'd also use it for deployment. Right? So, does that mean that no one is using Geronimo at all?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

小镇女孩 2024-07-17 02:14:36

对您的更新的答复:这只是意味着 SO 用户没有使用 Geronimo 或者都忙于投票和发表诙谐的评论。

Geronimo 的邮件列表上似乎有相当多的活动,我想说你会在那里得到更好的结果。

Answer to your update: It just means that SO users are not using Geronimo or are all busy voting and making witty comments.

There seems to be quite a bit of acivity on Geronimo's mailing list, and I would say that you'll get better results there.

一绘本一梦想 2024-07-17 02:14:36

WebSphere 社区版是 Geronimo。 因此 IBM 选择它作为首选平台。

选择应用程序服务器时,您实际上是在选择要在应用程序中使用的 API,也许还有管理界面(但您只是偶尔使用一次)。

WebSphere community edition is Geronimo. So IBM chose it as a platform of choice.

When choosing an application server, you're really choosing the APIs you want to use in your application and maybe the administration interface (but you only use that once in a while).

不念旧人 2024-07-17 02:14:35

我们绝对会在生产中使用 Geronimo!

我们从 1.0 开始就使用 Tomcat 版本,我记得大约是四年前。 我们目前运行的主要是 2.1.1.4。

我们的一款应用程序每天获得大约 100 万次页面浏览量。 其他应用程序远未达到这一点,但它们是需要良好运行的重要应用程序。

我们的选择主要基于:

  1. 价格:当我们公司开始使用 Java 时,我们不确定我们需要从应用程序服务器中得到什么。 因此,我们决定从免费开始,并在需要时逐步提高。
  2. 基本功能:我有使用WebSphere(基本/ND)和普通旧Tomcat 的经验。 Geronimo 具有我们想要的 J2EE 功能,所有这些功能都包含在一个轻量级包中。
  3. 开源:我们的主要客户,我们使用 Java 来获取所需的开源。
  4. 熟悉程度:作为基于 Apache 的服务器,我们已经熟悉 Tomcat、OpenJPA、Axis Web 服务等。 此外,就错误跟踪和其他小事情而言,我们对 Apache 社区感到满意。
  5. 支持:我们预计主要依靠我们自己,但了解 Apache 社区的活跃非常重要。 正如 IBM 提供的商业支持一样,我们是 IBM 业务合作伙伴。

总的来说,我们的经历很棒。 服务器非常可靠。 我偶尔会搜索我们的日志,有时会看到数据库连接、EJB 调用方面的奇怪错误,但这些错误非常罕见(很可能是我们的代码的错误)。

表现令人印象深刻。 我开玩笑说,我们可以从我的笔记本电脑上运行 Geronimo,而客户不会看到任何差异。 给它任何像样的服务器,它就会咕咕叫几个月。

我不确定有多少人实际运行 Geronimo。 我对此很困惑。 我(几年前)看过一些幻灯片,其中列出了 eBay 等一些大公司正在使用它。 邮件列表是活跃的,但有时似乎只有 Geronimo 团队在相互通信。

我遇到的唯一严重错误是这个。 这对我们来说是一件大事,但当然 Geronimo 是免费的,我不希望他们修复对我来说很重要的错误。

我一直想检查一下 Apache TomEE 服务器,想知道它是否被更积极地或公开地使用。 只是为了看看社区和使用情况与 Geronimo 相比如何。

We definitely use Geronimo in production!

We have used the Tomcat version since 1.0, about four years ago as I recall. We are currently running mostly 2.1.1.4.

One of our apps gets about 1 million page views per day. The others are nowhere near that, but they are important apps that need to work well.

Our choice was based primarily on:

  1. Price: At the time our company started using Java, we weren't sure what we needed out of an app server. So we decided to start at free and work our way up, if needed.
  2. Basic features: I had experience with WebSphere (base/ND) and plain old Tomcat. Geronimo had the J2EE features we wanted, all within a lightweight package.
  3. Open Source: Our primary client that we use Java for required Open Source.
  4. Familiarity: Being an Apache-based server, we were already comfortable with Tomcat, OpenJPA, Axis web services, and others. Furthermore, we were comfortable with the Apache community as far as bug tracking and other minor things.
  5. Support: We expected to be mostly on our own, but knowing that the Apache community was active was important. As was the availability of commercial support from IBM, as we are an IBM Business Partner.

Our experience has been great overall. The servers are very reliable. I search our logs once in awhile and sometimes see weird errors with a database connection, an EJB call, but those are pretty rare (and quite possibly our code's fault).

Performance is impressive. I joke that we could run Geronimo from my laptop and the clients wouldn't see a difference. Give it any decent server and it will purr along for months.

I'm not sure how many people actual run Geronimo. I'm rather confused about that. I've seen slides (years ago) that listed some big names like eBay using it. The mailing list is active but sometimes seems like only the Geronimo team communicating with each other.

The only serious bug I've run into is this one. It is a big deal to us, but of course Geronimo is free and I don't expect them to fix bugs that are important just to me.

I've been meaning to check out Apache TomEE server, wondering if it is more actively or openly used. Just to see how the community and usage compares to Geronimo.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文