JavaScript 中的原型继承

发布于 2024-07-10 00:25:52 字数 424 浏览 7 评论 0原文

我一直在 YUI Theater 观看 Douglas Crockford 的演讲,我有一个关于 JavaScript 继承的问题...

Douglas 给出了这个例子来表明“Hoozit”继承自“Gizmo”:

function Hoozit(id) {
    this.id = id;
}
Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo();
Hoozit.prototype.test = function (id) {
    return this.id === id;
};

为什么他写 Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo() 而不是 Hoozit.prototype = Gizmo.prototype

这两者有什么区别吗?

I've been watching Douglas Crockford's talks at YUI Theater, and I have a question about JavaScript inheritance...

Douglas gives this example to show that "Hoozit" inherits from "Gizmo":

function Hoozit(id) {
    this.id = id;
}
Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo();
Hoozit.prototype.test = function (id) {
    return this.id === id;
};

Why does he write Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo() instead of Hoozit.prototype = Gizmo.prototype?

Is there any difference between these two?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(4

木有鱼丸 2024-07-17 00:25:52

原因是使用 Hoozit.prototype = Gizmo.prototype 意味着修改 Hoozit 的原型对象也会修改 Gizmo 类型的对象,这不是预期的行为。

Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo() 继承自 Gizmo,然后单独保留 Gizmo。

The reason is that using Hoozit.prototype = Gizmo.prototype would mean that modifying Hoozit's prototype object would also modify objects of type Gizmo, which is not expected behavior.

Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo() inherits from Gizmo, and then leaves Gizmo alone.

怪异←思 2024-07-17 00:25:52

其他答案解决了这个问题,但如果你确实想继承原型,你可以使用一些寄生魔法:

Object.prototype.inherit = function(p) {
    NewObj = function(){};
    NewObj.prototype = p;
    return new NewObj(); 
};

// Paraphrasing of Nicholas Zakas's Prototype Inheritance helper
function inheritPrototype(subType, superType) {
    var prototype = Object.inherit(superType.prototype);
    prototype.constructor = subType;
    subType.prototype = prototype;
};

现在你可以替换:

Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo();

inheritPrototype(Hoozit, Gizmo);

它可能不值得麻烦,除非你有一个真正的大Gizmo构造函数(唯一的胜利我的建议是你不必调用 Gizmo 的构造函数来连接原型)。 我在 TDD JavaScript Examples

The other answers address this, but if you DO want to inherit the prototype, you can use some parasitic magic:

Object.prototype.inherit = function(p) {
    NewObj = function(){};
    NewObj.prototype = p;
    return new NewObj(); 
};

// Paraphrasing of Nicholas Zakas's Prototype Inheritance helper
function inheritPrototype(subType, superType) {
    var prototype = Object.inherit(superType.prototype);
    prototype.constructor = subType;
    subType.prototype = prototype;
};

Now you can replace the:

Hoozit.prototype = new Gizmo();

with

inheritPrototype(Hoozit, Gizmo);

It might not be worth the trouble unless you have a real big Gizmo constructor (the only win in my suggestion is that you don't have to call Gizmo's constructor to hook up the prototype). I have examples of many of these types of patterns in TDD JavaScript Examples.

单身狗的梦 2024-07-17 00:25:52

如果他写成 Hoozit.prototype = Gizmo.prototype ,那么他以后对 Hoozit 原型所做的任何修改都会反映在 Gizmo 原型中。

If he writes Hoozit.prototype = Gizmo.prototype any modfication he makes later to the prototype of Hoozit will be reflected in the prototype of Gizmo.

小姐丶请自重 2024-07-17 00:25:52

除了 Triptych 的回答之外:Hoozit 实例还将继承 Gizmo 的所有实例属性,而不仅仅是原型中定义的属性; 例如:

function Gizmo() {
    this.foo = 'bar'; // foo is visible in every Hoozit instance
}

In addition to Triptych's answer: Hoozit instances will also inherit all instance properties of Gizmo, not only the ones defined in the prototype; eg:

function Gizmo() {
    this.foo = 'bar'; // foo is visible in every Hoozit instance
}
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文