Flash Builder 与 FlashDevelop 的优缺点是什么?
我想尝试一下 FLASH 来进行应用程序开发。 我正在为此寻找一个好的 IDE。 有人建议使用Flash Develop。
I want to play around a bit with FLASH for app development. I'm looking for a good IDE for that. Someone suggested Flash Develop.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(8)
Flash Builder
优点
缺点
FlashDevelop
优点
缺点
常见
优点
缺点
总结
用于调试、MXML 表单的可视化设计:Flash Builder
用于在 Windows 下编写 AS2/AS3/Haxe 项目:FlashDevelop
Flash Builder
Pros
Cons
FlashDevelop
Pros
Cons
Common
Pros
Cons
Summary
For debugging, visual design of MXML forms : Flash Builder
For coding AS2/AS3/Haxe projects under Windows : FlashDevelop
使用 FlexBuilder 的主要原因:有一个真正的调试器,您可以设置断点和单步以及监视/编辑变量。
除非FlashDevelop已经..开发了..,否则我认为它还没有做到这一点。
顺便说一句 - 如果您是学生/教师,则可以免费使用 FlexBuilder
Major reason to use FlexBuilder: has a real debugger you can set breakpoints and single step and watch/edit variables.
Unless FlashDevelop has .. developed .. don't think it got any of that yet.
BTW - if you are a student/teacher FlexBuilder can be had for free
Flex 构建器具有 MXML 设计视图,因此您可以更直观地进行构建。 另一方面,Flashdevelop 是免费的!
Flex builder has a design view for MXML so you can build more visually. Flashdevelop on the other hand is free!
我一直在使用 Flash Developer。 现在正在尝试FlashDevelop。 FlashDevelop 快速且轻便,正是因为如此,我才尝试切换。
我使用 HG + TortoiseHG 进行源代码控制。 我有 2 个屏幕,因此拥有外部源代码控制并不是一个大问题。 此外,IDE 没有所有小的源代码管理图标,因此保持了一些简洁。
DesignView 提供帮助没有集成设计。
另外,我可以使用 FlashDevelop 进行调试并查看变量。 我使用的是FD3.2.1。
I've been using Flash Developer. Trying now FlashDevelop. FlashDevelop is fast and light, and I'm trying to switch just because of that.
I'm using HG + TortoiseHG for source control. I have 2 screens, so having external source control is not a big problem. Also the IDE stays a little cleaner by not having all the little source control icons.
DesignView helps with not having integrated design.
Also, I can debug with FlashDevelop and see the variables. I'm using FD3.2.1.
除了已经提到的内容之外,Flex Builder 还有一些很好的工具,可以帮助开发人员学习如何以数据向导的形式创建支持数据的 Flex 应用程序,以及一个很好的Web 服务自省 自动为 Web 服务创建 ActionScript 3 客户端的工具。
Along with what was already mentioned, Flex Builder has some nice tools that helps a developer to learn how to create a data enabled Flex application in form of the Data Wizards and also a nice web services introspection tool that automatically creates an ActionScript 3 client for a web service.
我正在使用新的 Jetbrains IntelliJ 8,它非常棒(特别是如果您习惯于 java 开发)。 拥有比任何其他 IDE 更好的 XML/JavaScript 编辑器。
最新版本的 IntelliJ 还有一个很好的 flex/javascript 调试器。
I'm using the new Jetbrains IntelliJ 8, and it's great (especially if your used to java developement). Has a lot better XML/JavaScript editors that any other IDE.
The latest version of IntelliJ also has a good flex/javascript debugger.
以下是 FlashDevelop(使用 Flex 3 SDK)和 FlexBuilder 之间的两个客观对比。 首先,只有 FlexBuilder 包含 AdvancedDataGrid。 其次,FlashDevelop没有源代码控制集成。
AdvancedDataGrid不包含在免费或开源 Flex 3 SDK 中; 如果你想要它,你必须购买FlexBuilder。 (我认为如果您拥有 FlexBuilder,可能可以通过另一个 SDK 使用它。)
FlashDevelop 没有任何源代码控制集成,FlexBuilder 拥有 Eclipse 现有的、稳定的源代码控制选项。 这包括 Subclipse for SVN 以及许多其他东西。 作为一名长期的 Visual Studio 和 Emacs 用户,在 FlashDevelop 中,我开始对让编辑器签入感到不满意。
Here are two objective contrasts between FlashDevelop (with the Flex 3 SDK) and FlexBuilder. First, only FlexBuilder includes AdvancedDataGrid. Second, FlashDevelop has no source control integration.
AdvancedDataGrid is not included in either the free or open source Flex 3 SDKs; if you want it, you have to buy FlexBuilder. (I assume it is probably possible to use it via another SDK if you possess FlexBuilder.)
FlashDevelop doesn't have any source control integration, FlexBuilder possesses the existing, stable source control options for Eclipse. This includes Subclipse for SVN, as well as a lot of other things. As a longtime Visual Studio and Emacs user, in FlashDevelop I'm beginning to feel unsatisfied with leaving the editor to check in.
Flash Builder,即使在 4.5 版本中,也具有原始的、无用的语法着色和自定义功能。 从 700 美元的套餐中,我期望至少能用我的免费文本编辑器做些什么。
语法着色首选项中总共有6个关键字,并且不能添加任何自定义关键字。
我怎样才能编写出具有完全相同的变量名、函数调用和类的代码?
我会坚持使用 Flash Pro CS5.5 和 SciTe。
Flash Builder, even in version 4.5, has primitive, useless syntax coloring and customization features. From a 700$ package I was expecting at least what I can do with my free text editor.
In the syntax coloring preferences, there is a total of 6 keywords, and you cannot add any custom one.
How am I expected to code having variable names, function calls, and classes look exactly the same?
I will stick to Flash Pro CS5.5 and SciTe.