Eclipse 可视化编辑器死了吗？
Eclipse Visual Editor 项目似乎已经死了，没有提交，没有更新。 有人知道发生了什么事吗？
The Eclipse Visual Editor project seems to be dead, no commits, no updates. Any one know what is happening?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（10）
更新 2： 该项目自 6 月以来已存档（即已死亡）又是2011年。
更新：项目已恢复 现在再次积极开发。
由于缺乏开发人员支持，它几乎已经死了。 这里是一些 最近 他们的邮件列表中的帖子谈论了该项目缺乏进展。
Update 2: The project has been archived (i.e. dead) since June 2011 again.
Update: The project has been revived and is now under active development again.
Its pretty much dead due to a lack of developer support. Here are some recent posts from their mailing list talking about a lack of movement on the project.
发生了什么？ 它被称为 NetBeans，而且它已经发生了。
我会因此被否决，但他们知道这是真的。 我喜欢 eclipse，并且自从我开始使用 Java 以来就一直虔诚地使用它。 我并不是说我喜欢 Netbeans，只是每当提起 Java 可视化编辑器的概念时我听到的都是这个。
What's happening? It's called NetBeans, and it's already happened.
I'm going to get voted down for this but they know it's true. I love eclipse and have used it religiously since I started Java. I'm not saying I like Netbeans, it's just all I hear whenever the concept of a Java visual editor is brought up.
用于 Eclipse 的 Jigloo 插件是可视化编辑器的一个非常好的替代品。 虽然仍然不如 Netbeans GUI 编辑器那么好，但它相当强大且功能齐全，特别是与可视化编辑器插件中提供的功能相比。 绝对应该尝试一下。
The Jigloo plug-in for Eclipse is a pretty great alternative to the Visual Editor. Though still not quite as nice as the Netbeans GUI editor it is fairly robust and fully featured, especially compared to what was available in the Visual Editor plug-in. Definitely should give it a shot.
事实上，NetBeans 已经变得更好了。 我已经使用 Eclipse、Netbeans 和 IntelliJ 各有几年了，现在 NetBeans 至少和其他的一样好（性能、可用性和功能）。
它的进步也比其他人更快。
他们有专人全职致力于替代语言支持，因此您会发现他们拥有业界最好的 Ruby 支持，而且我相信 Python 也将变得如此出色。
当然，Eclipse 仍然有那个非常酷的待办事项列表，它会记住您处理每个错误的文件，并且可以带您返回到您处理过的任何错误的文件/编辑集，这使用起来真的很棒，我不认为它可以在其他任何平台上使用。
--- 未来几年的修订 ---
我更多地使用了 Netbeans，真的必须把这个奖颁给 Eclipse。 差异在于垂直编程环境——大多数将针对 Eclipse 而忽略 netbeans。 您很少需要这些，但是当您需要它们时通常没有办法绕过它们。 如果 Netbeans 确实有类似的功能，那么它通常会出现问题，甚至无法使用，通常最大的问题是模拟器支持。
除非您在特定行业工作，否则您不会遇到这些问题——Android 开发就是其中之一，主要驱动力是支持 Eclipse，NB 似乎落后了。 我从事的另一个工作是电视/有线电视行业。
然而，对于原始 Java 开发，我仍然会给 Netbeans 一点优势，因为它是 sun 的目标和支持的环境。
Actually NetBeans has gotten MUCH MUCH better. I've used Eclipse, Netbeans and IntelliJ for a few years each, and NetBeans is at least as good (performance, usability & features) as the others now.
It's also improving more quickly than the others are.
They have people working full time on alternate language support, so you'll find they have the best Ruby support in the industry, and I believe Python is about to become that good as well.
Of course, Eclipse still has that crazy-cool todo list that remembers which files you worked on for each bug and can take you back to the set of files/edits for any bug you've worked on, that's really amazing to use and I don't think it's available on either of the other platforms.
--- Revision from years in the future ---
I have used Netbeans more and really have to give the award to Eclipse. The difference has been in vertical programming environments--most will target Eclipse and ignore netbeans. You rarely need these, but when you need them there is often no way around them. If Netbeans does have an equivalent, it's often buggy to the point of not being usable, generally the biggest issue is emulator support.
You won't run into these unless you are working in a specific industry--Android development is one, the primary drive was to support Eclipse, NB seems to trail. Another I've worked on is in the TV/Cable industry.
For raw java development, however, I'd still give Netbeans a little edge because it's the environment that was targeted and supported by sun.
Visual Editor 将于 9 月 16 日发布新版本 1.4。RC 的安装说明位于：
http: //wiki.eclipse.org/VE/Update
FWIW，该项目确实停滞了一段时间。 但又有一个新的、相对多样化的团队再次致力于此。 最近的大部分工作都涉及使新版本与 Eclipse Galileo 兼容。
Visual Editor is doing a new release, 1.4, on September 16. Installation instructions for the RC are here:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/VE/Update
FWIW, the project did stall for a while. But there is a new, and relatively diverse group of folks working on it again. Most of the recent work is concerned with making the new release compatible with Eclipse Galileo.
截至 2011 年 5 月，它已正式停止使用。它已存档于此处，但下载速度很慢且安装起来也很棘手。 相反，有一个新的编辑器 WindowBuilder Pro。
It's officially dead as of May 2011. It's archived here, but slow to download and tricky to install. Instead, there's a new editor, WindowBuilder Pro.
目前，Google 已开源 Windows Builder Pro。 看起来不错
Currentlty Google have Open Sourced the Windows Builder Pro. It seems nice
是的，
http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/t91368.html< /a>
yeap,
http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/t91368.html
是的，遗憾的是，它已经死了。 看看前面提到的关于它的复兴的电子邮件线程，我有一种感觉，即使它确实被采纳，它也会在一些新要求的重压下迅速崩溃（“使其通用，编辑从 SWT 到 HTML 的所有内容”）。
Yes, sadly, it is dead. Looking at the aforementioned email threads regarding it's revival I get the feeling that even if it does get picked up it will quickly collapse under the weight of some new requirements ("make it universal, edit everything from SWT to HTML").
WindowBuilder 可能是一个不错的选择。 我在使用 VE 时遇到了一些问题，最后我选择了 WindowBuilder，它非常适合我。
http://www.eclipse.org/windowbuilder/
WindowBuilder can be a good alternative. I had several problems with VE and I end up with WindowBuilder who worked for me perfectly.
http://www.eclipse.org/windowbuilder/