MySQL - 从数字列表中选择在表的 id 字段中没有对应项的数字
我有一个数字列表,例如 {2,4,5,6,7} 我有一个表 foos,带有 foos.ID,包括 {1,2,3,4,8,9}
我想获取我的数字列表,并找到那些在我的表的 ID 字段中没有对应项的数字。
实现此目的的一种方法是创建一个表格栏,在 ID 字段中加载 {2,4,5,6,7}。 然后,我会做
SELECT bars.* FROM bars LEFT JOIN foos ON bars.ID = foos.ID WHERE foos.ID IS NULL
但是,我想在没有临时表的情况下完成这个任务。
有人对它如何发生有任何意见吗?
I have a list of numbers, say {2,4,5,6,7}
I have a table, foos, with foos.ID, including say, {1,2,3,4,8,9}
Id like to take my list of numbers, and find those without a counterpart in the ID field of my table.
One way to achieve this would be to create a table bars, loaded with {2,4,5,6,7} in the ID field.
Then, I would do
SELECT bars.* FROM bars LEFT JOIN foos ON bars.ID = foos.ID WHERE foos.ID IS NULL
However, I'd like to accomplish this sans temp table.
Anyone have any input on how it might happen?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(6)
这是一个非常常见的问题:动态生成关系而不创建表。 对于这个问题的 SQL 解决方案非常尴尬。 一个使用派生表的示例:
但这并不能很好地扩展,因为您可能有很多值,而不仅仅是六个。 构造一个长列表,其中每个值都需要一个
UNION
,这可能会变得很烦人。另一种解决方案是手头保留一个十位数字的通用表格,并将其重复用于多种目的。
我显示了内部查询生成从 0..99 开始的值,尽管对于本例来说这不是必需的。 但列表中的值可能大于 10。 要点是,使用一个表
num
,您可以生成大量数字,而不必求助于每个值一个UNION
的很长的链。 此外,您可以在一处指定所需值的列表,这样更方便且更具可读性。This is a problem that is pretty common: generating a relation on the fly without creating a table. SQL solutions for this problem are pretty awkward. One example using a derived table:
But this doesn't scale very well, because you might have many values instead of just six. It can become tiresome to construct a long list with one
UNION
needed per value.Another solution is to keep a general-purpose table of ten digits on hand, and use it repeatedly for multiple purposes.
I show the inner query generating values from 0..99 even though this isn't necessary for this case. But you might have values greater than 10 in your list. The point is that with one table
num
, you can generate large numbers without having to resort to very long chains with oneUNION
per value. Also, you can specify the list of desired values in one place, which is more convenient and readable.我找不到不使用临时表的精确问题的解决方案,但是使用子选择而不是联接进行查询的另一种方法是:
像我最初写的其他海报一样:
但后来我意识到这会产生与你想要的相反的结果。
I can't find a solution to your precise problem that doesn't use a temporary table, but an alternate way of doing your query using a sub-select instead of a join is:
Like the other posters I originally wrote:
but then I realised that this is producing the opposite to what you want.
如果您使用 PHP,则无需创建任何临时表即可完成此工作。
您可以使用 PHP 的 array_diff() 函数将其转换为所需的结果。 如果您的列表 (2,4,5,6,7) 位于名为 $list 的数组中,并且上面查询的结果位于数组 $result 中,那么
...将返回列表中的所有数字,没有对应项在你的数据库表中。 虽然此解决方案不会在查询中执行整个操作,但您需要在 PHP 中执行的后处理是最少的,以获得您想要的结果,并且避免创建临时表可能是值得的。
If you use PHP, you can make this work without creating any temporary tables.
You can use PHP's array_diff() function to convert this to the desired result. If your list (2,4,5,6,7) is in an array called $list and the result of the query above is in an array $result, then
...will return all the numbers in your list with no counterpart in your database table. While this solution doesn't perform the entire operation within the query, the post-processing you need to do in PHP is minimal to get what you want, and it may be worthwhile to avoid having to create a temporary table.
我有类似的问题。 我有一个范围,其中自动递增主键有一些缺失值,所以首先我发现有多少个值:
从 nid > 的节点中选择 count(*) 1962 年。
将此数字与最高值进行比较,我发现该数字丢失了。 然后我运行了这个查询:
从节点 n1 中选择 n2.nid 在 n1.nid = (n2.nid - 1) 上右连接节点 n2,其中 n1.nid 为 null 并且 n2.nid > 1962
这将找到非连续缺失记录的数量。 它不会显示连续的,而且我不完全确定如何做到这一点,除了更改 ON 子句以允许更大的纬度(这将使 JOIN 表变得更大)。
无论如何,这给了我总共七个缺失结果中的五个结果,另外两个保证至少与五个结果之一相邻。 如果失踪人数较多,您可能需要其他方法来查找剩余的失踪人员。
I had a similar problem. I had a range where the auto-incrementing primary key had some missing values, so first I found how many there were:
select count(*) from node where nid > 1962
.Comparing this number against the highest value, I got the number missing. Then I ran this query:
select n2.nid from node n1 right join node n2 on n1.nid = (n2.nid - 1) where n1.nid is null and n2.nid > 1962
This will find the number of non-consecutive missing records. It won't show consecutive ones, and I'm not entirely certain how to do that, beyond changing the ON clause to allow greater latitude (which would make the JOIN table substantially larger).
In any case, this gave me five results out of the total seven missing, and the other two were guaranteed to be next to at least one of the five. If you have a larger number missing, you'll probably need some other way of finding the remaining missing.
Alnitak 的(和你的)解决方案应该可以工作,我无法想象其他只能在 SQL 语言中工作的解决方案。
但问题来了——如何传递值列表? 在调用代码中处理这个问题不是更好吗 - 即请求 ID 并在排序代码中进行比较,排序代码可能采用更适合这种操作的语言。
Alnitak's (and yours) solution should work, and I can not thing about anything else which can work only in SQL language.
But here comes the question - how do you pass the list of values? Isn't it better to handle this in the calling code - i.e. request the ID's and compare it in the colling code, which may be in a language better suited for this kind of manipulations.
碰巧来到这里寻找答案。 之前的帖子是 MySQL 8 之前的文章。由于 MySQL 从 8.0.19 版本开始就有
value
语句,因此可以使用value
语句和CTE
非常优雅地解决这个问题。 code> 从 MySQL 8.0 开始也可用第 1 步:
将 CTE 和 value 语句结合起来,创建一组行,其中包含需要与表(此处表为
foo
)进行比较的值。第 2 步:
过滤 CTE 中具有空值的行,
将 CTE 与表
foo
进行外连接,并在外连接后使用foo
Trail或者使用IN 子句
Happened to reach here searching for an answer. Earlier posts are pre MySQL 8. Since MySQL has
value
statement since version 8.0.19 , the question can be very elegantly solved usingvalue
statement along withCTE
which is also available since MySQL 8.0Step 1:
Combine CTE and value statement to create a set of rows with the values that needs to be compared to the table (here the table is
foo
).Step 2:
Outer join the CTE with the table
foo
and filter the rows which has the null values from the CTE after the outer join withfoo
Trail
Or using IN clause