适当使用DL和DD吗？
我最近有一些为我设计的网站模板。 我得到了最终的 HTML 代码，该代码已验证，但文档的结构是使用 DL-DD 对进行布局的：
<dl>
<dd class="some-class">
Some text.
</dd>
</dl>
我对这些标签不是特别熟悉，因为我从未经常使用它们，但它们似乎并不是有意的用于文档结构。 我对吗？ 设计师为什么要这么做？
I had some site templates designed for me recently. I got the final HTML code, which validates, but the structure of the document is laid out using DL-DD pairs:
<dl>
<dd class="some-class">
Some text.
</dd>
</dl>
I'm not especially familiar with those tags as I've never used them much, but they don't seem intended for document structure. Am I right? Why would a designer do this?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
来自 WC3：http://www.w3.org/TR /html401/struct/lists.html#h-10.3
因此，根据您的示例，这些类型的结构应用于特定类型的内容，而不是构建不适合此上下文的数据。
From WC3: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#h-10.3
So given your example, these types of structures should be used for a specific type of content and not structuring of data that does not fit within this context.
你是对的，不应该这样使用它。 我能想到的设计者使用它们的唯一原因是
标签在大多数浏览器中都是缩进的。 如果它们覆盖了它们的填充/边距，那么您的猜测和我的一样好。You're right in that it shouldn't be used like that. The only reason I can think of for the designer using them is that the
<dd>tag is indented in most browsers. If they're overriding the padding/margins on them, then your guess is as good as mine.DL标签与UL标签大致相同，它启动一个无序列表。不同之处在于，
DL/DD对中基本上没有项目符号。但大多数时候，它用于实际用途，即D定义列表，并与
DT和DD，即Definition Term和Definition Description，它们将看起来像 :默认情况下，该术语会缩进一点，并进一步缩进它的定义。
A
DLtag is about the same as aULtag, it starts an unordered list.The difference being that there basically is no bullet in a
DL/DDcouple.Most of the time, though, it's used for it's real use, that is, a Definition List, and is used with
DTandDD, which are Definition Term and Definition Description which would look like :which will, by default, indent the term a bit, and indent it's definition a bit more.