在 RoR 2.x 中使用 respond_to 通过 ajax 实现优雅降级

发布于 2024-07-07 11:04:47 字数 532 浏览 6 评论 0原文

我正在阅读有关使用 ruby on Rails 进行 Web 开发的 AWDR 书籍，旧代码的问题之一是它没有使用 respond_to 来确保使用的视图是 javascript 视图。现在，在一些更新的示例中，我看到人们稍后提到，在实现优雅降级时，使用 request.xhr？判断用户是否启用了 javascript，如果没有，则重定向用户。

我想知道您是否可以使用 respond_to 来获得相同的行为，如果可以，这是否被认为是好的形式，为什么？

所以我想做的是这样的：

def function
  respond_to do |format|
    format.js do
      basic_stuff
    end
    format.html do
      basic_stuff
      user_redirect
    end
  end
end

它似乎确实有点违反了 DRY 原则，而且我可能错过了有关用户和服务器如何交互的一些信息。说实话，API 文档并没有让我完全清楚。

原文

I was going through the AWDR book on web development with ruby on rails and one of the issues with the old code was it didn't use respond_to to make sure the view used would be the javascript view. Now in some updated examples I've seen people mention they later, when implementing graceful degradation, use request.xhr? to tell if the user has javascript enabled, and if not they redirect the user.

I was wondering if you could use respond_to to get the same behaviour and if so, if this is considered good form or not and why?

So what I'm thinking of doing is something like:

def function
  respond_to do |format|
    format.js do
      basic_stuff
    end
    format.html do
      basic_stuff
      user_redirect
    end
  end
end

It does seem to sorta violate the DRY principle, and I'm probably missing something about how the user and the server are interacting here. To be honest the API documentation did not make it entirely clear to me.

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

凉城凉梦凉人心 2024-07-14 11:04:48

那么您可以像这样重构：

def function
  basic_stuff # executed regardless of the mime types accepted
  respond_to do |format|
    format.html do
      user_redirect
    end
  end
  # will fall back rendering the default view - which you should ensure will be js
end

request.xhr? 查看请求的 X-Requested-With 标头（以查看它是否包含“XMLHttpRequest”）。 respond_to 查看接受的 mime 类型。

您可以使用其中任何一个来实现某种优雅的降级。

但是除非您的 ajax 调用设置该标头（Prototype 自动执行此操作），否则您将无法使用 xhr? 进行优雅的降级。

此外，respond_to 提供了更大的灵活性，即发送 xml、json、js，无论它来自同一个块。

所以我在这里推荐respond_to。

Well you can refactor like this:

def function
  basic_stuff # executed regardless of the mime types accepted
  respond_to do |format|
    format.html do
      user_redirect
    end
  end
  # will fall back rendering the default view - which you should ensure will be js
end

request.xhr? looks at the request‘s X-Requested-With header (to see whether it contains "XMLHttpRequest"). respond_to looks at the mime types accepted.

You can use either to implement some sort of graceful degredation.

BUT You won't be able to use xhr? for graceful degredation unless your ajax calls are setting that header (Prototype does this automatically).

Moreover, respond_to gives more flexibility i.e. sending xml, json, js, whatever it might be from the same block.

So I'd recommend respond_to here.

回复收藏 0 原文

~没有更多了~