什么是好的非所见即所得 HTML 编辑器?

发布于 2024-07-07 09:43:30 字数 214 浏览 8 评论 0原文

我不喜欢所见即所得的编辑器,我想负责每个标签和属性的选择和放置! 是否有一个好的编辑器可以让您完全控制 HTML,但提供有用的功能,例如:

  • 语法突出显示(当然)
  • 标签、属性的建议等,例如下拉列表
  • 验证和可访问性检查
  • 预览 HTML

目前我使用 TextPad带有语法突出显示,但感觉我可以做得更好。

I don't like WYIWYG editors, I want to be responsible for the selection and placement of each tag and attribute! Is there a good editor out there that allows you complete control over the HTML but offers useful features such as:

  • syntax highlighting (of course)
  • suggestions of tags, attributes etc. e.g. as dropdown lists
  • validation and accessibility checking
  • previewing the HTML

Currently I use TextPad with syntax highlighting, but feel I could do better.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(13

遇见了你 2024-07-14 09:43:31

我真的很喜欢 Mac 上的 Coda http://www.panic.com/coda/

I really like Coda on the Mac http://www.panic.com/coda/.

笑着哭最痛 2024-07-14 09:43:31

HTMLKit 相当不错并且免费。

HTMLKit is reasonably decent and free.

陪你搞怪i 2024-07-14 09:43:31

我非常喜欢 Microsoft Expression Web 2.0 或 Microsoft SharePoint Designer 2007,具体取决于我的需要。

具体来说,Microsoft Expression Web 2.0 支持基础知识(HTML、CSS 等)的开发,同时包括针对 ASP.NET 和 PHP 的 Intellisense。

Microsoft SharePoint Designer 2007 包括对SharePoint Services 和MOSS 的支持。

我听人们说他们喜欢 Dreamweaver,但就我的口味而言,它有点臃肿。 我上面提到的这两个工具都允许进行所见即所得编辑,但它们也支持您列出的所有功能。 它们还允许文档类型支持和可访问性验证等。

I really like Microsoft Expression Web 2.0 or Microsoft SharePoint Designer 2007, depending on my needs.

Specifically, Microsoft Expression Web 2.0 supports development of the basics (HTML, CSS, etc.) while including Intellisense for ASP.NET and PHP.

Microsoft SharePoint Designer 2007 includes support for SharePoint Services and MOSS.

I've heard people say that they like Dreamweaver, but it's a little on the bloated side for my taste. Both the tools I mentioned above allow for WYSIWYG editing, but they support all the features you listed as well. They also allow for doctype support and validation for accessibility, etc.

月下伊人醉 2024-07-14 09:43:31

我推荐程序员记事本进行轻量级代码编辑,但我有偏见:)

公平地说,这些也都是同样有好处:
Notepad++,
SciTE
Notepad2

然而,这些(包括 PN)都无法实现您所要求的预览等功能。 对于这些功能,您需要一些功能更齐全的东西,例如已经推荐的优秀的 Expression Web,甚至可能是 Visual Web Developer。

我还应该指出,已经有大量关于 SO 的编辑器讨论:

https://stackoverflow.com/search?q= html+编辑器

I recommend Programmer's Notepad for lightweight code editing, but then I'm biased :)

To be fair, these are all also good for the same:
Notepad++,
SciTE,
Notepad2.

None of these (including PN) do the big extras you're asking for with previews and the like, however. For those features you need something more full featured like the already recommended and excellent Expression Web or perhaps even Visual Web Developer.

I should point out also that there are loads of editor discussions on SO already:

https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=html+editor

匿名。 2024-07-14 09:43:31

我仍然使用旧版本 (4.0) 的 Homesite,它几乎可以满足我的所有需求和需要。 它最初是由 Nick Bradbury 编写的,不太重,具有正确的功能集,并且很受欢迎。

尼克把Homesite卖给了阿莱尔,然后它被越来越大的鱼吃掉了。 但它仍然得到维护,并且现在与 Dreamweaver 一起作为文本出售 - Macromedia(现在是 Adob​​e)基于 HTML 的替代方案。

他们收费 99 美元。

我本想升级,但他们只有 4.5 及更高版本的升级定价。 对于以下情绪化的评论感到抱歉,但我说软件供应商不应该忽视其程序的早期采用者。 排在第一位的人应该得到特殊的终身待遇。 如果您允许的话,他们将成为您软件的最佳客户和最佳代言人。

I still use an old version (4.0) of Homesite and it does just about all I want and need. It was originally written by Nick Bradbury and was not too heavy, had just the right set of features, and was very popular.

Nick sold Homesite to Allaire and then it was eaten by bigger and bigger fish. But it is still maintained and now being sold alongside Dreamweaver as a text-based HTML alternative by Macromedia (and now Adobe).

They charge $99 USD for it.

I would have upgraded, but they only have upgrade pricing for version 4.5 and after. Sorry for the following emotional comment, but I say Software vendors should not ignore early adopters of their programs. People who were first in line deserve special and lifetime treatment. They will become your best customers and best spokesmen for your software, if you let them.

暖心男生 2024-07-14 09:43:31

我知道你在 Windows 上(从你描述的工具中),但是,对于下一个 Mac 人员阅读这个问题:

TextMate 真的不适合编辑各种东西,尤其是东西的集合(比如 C 的项目, ruby、java、html、perl、bash 等)如果它具有 SubEthaEdit 进行协作编辑的能力,那么它将是我使用过的唯一编辑器。

TextMate

I realize you're on Windows (from the tools you describe) but, for the next Mac guy to read this question:

TextMate seriously does-not-suck for editing all sorts of things, especially collections of things (like projects of C, ruby, java, html, perl, bash, etc.) If it had SubEthaEdit's ability to do cooperative editing, it'd be the only editor I ever use.

TextMate

画离情绘悲伤 2024-07-14 09:43:31

根据您将使用的代码(ASP、php、ruby 等),我建议使用 Dreamweaver。 它是所见即所得的,但您会发现许多最好的编辑器都是如此,包括 VS 2008。当然,这并不意味着您必须使用它! 我在上一份工作中经常使用 Dreamweaver,它非常适合编辑代码和快速预览。

编辑:我应该提到 Dreamweaver 最适合 html、css、javascript、coldfusion 和 php。 这些是我使用过的技术。

Depending on what code you will be using (ASP v. php v. ruby, etc), I would suggest Dreamweaver. It is WYSIWYG, but many of the best editors you would find are, including VS 2008. Of course, that doesn't mean you have to use it! I used Dreamweaver quite often at my last job and it was great for editing code and quickly previewing.

Edit: I should mention that Dreamweaver would be best for html, css, javascript, coldfusion, and php. Those are the technologies I have used it with.

白龙吟 2024-07-14 09:43:31

我真的很喜欢 Kate,而且由于它是一个 KPart,其他 KDE 程序都使用它作为编辑器,所以它无处不在!

(为什么其他人都假设你使用 Windows?)

I really like Kate, and since it's a KPart, other KDE programs use it as the editor, so it's goodness everywhere!

(why is everybody else assuming you use windows?)

梨涡少年 2024-07-14 09:43:31

你可能想看看 Bluefish - 这是我在家使用的 php。 它对许多语言的语法突出显示提供了很好的支持,并且在 HTML 方面还有很多其他好处。

我在工作中使用 Eclipse 来处理 J2EE 内容。 它附带了一些很棒的工具和 html/css/等的语法突出显示。

You might want to look into Bluefish - it's what I use for php at home. It has nice support for syntax highlighting for many languages and quite a bit of other goodies HTML-wise.

I use Eclipse here at work, for J2EE stuff. It comes with some great tools and syntax highlighting for html/css/etc.

2024-07-14 09:43:30

我非常喜欢 Aptana 进行通用 HTML/CSS/Javascript 编辑。 基于 Eclipse,但可用性更好。 自动格式化、代码建议(原生支持 jQuery 和 ExtJs)以及用于检查您的工作的嵌入式浏览器选项卡。

它也是跨平台的,支持 Windows Mac 和 Windows 操作系统。 Linux。

I'm a big fan of Aptana for generic HTML/CSS/Javascript editing. Based on Eclipse, but nicer usability. Automatic formatting, code suggestion (with native support for jQuery & ExtJs) and embedded browser tabs for checking your work.

It's also cross-platform, supports Windows Mac & Linux.

傲娇萝莉攻 2024-07-14 09:43:30

我喜欢记事本++; 它没有嵌入式预览,但它很轻量级,具有良好的 UI、可靠的语法突出显示...

I like Notepad++; it doesn't have embedded preview, but it's lightweight, has a good UI, syntax-highlights reliably...

塔塔猫 2024-07-14 09:43:30

Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 可能会满足您的需求(并且有免费下载的“express”版本)。

Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 might suit your needs (and there's a free download "express" version).

习ぎ惯性依靠 2024-07-14 09:43:30

其他人提到了 Visual Studio 和 HTML Kit。 您还可以考虑 DreamWeaverMicrosoft Expression Web。 从技术上讲,这两者(甚至 Visual Studio)都具有所见即所得模式,但它们也提供拆分源/所见即所得和仅纯源模式。 所有这些都具有验证、标准检查和全部九个功能。 如果您想要的话,所有这些都可以轻松地完全控制代码。 Expression 和 DreamWeaver 支持语法突出显示,而不仅仅是 HTML/ASP; 两者都本身支持 PHP。

这是Visual Web Developer Express 的链接(Brian 提到的免费 Visual Studio)。

Others have mentioned Visual Studio and HTML Kit. You might also consider DreamWeaver or Microsoft Expression Web. Technically, both of these (and even Visual Studio) have WYSIWYG modes, but they also offer split source/WYSIWYG and total source-only modes. All have validation, standards checking and the whole nine. All allow complete control over code with no fuss nor muss, if that's what you want. Expression and DreamWeaver support syntax highlighting for more than just HTML/ASP; both also support PHP natively.

Here's a link to Visual Web Developer Express (the free Visual Studio Brian mentioned).

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文