当前位置： 文江博客话题详情

Erlang 中的埃拉托斯特尼筛法

发布于 2024-07-07 09:36:41 字数 1450 浏览 7 评论 0原文

原文

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论， 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论（12）

深海少女心 2024-07-14 09:36:42

这是我的样本

S = lists:seq(2,100),
lists:foldl(fun(A,X) -> X--[A] end,S,[Y||X<-S,Y<-S,X<math:sqrt(Y)+1,Y rem X==0]).

:-)

Here is my sample

S = lists:seq(2,100),
lists:foldl(fun(A,X) -> X--[A] end,S,[Y||X<-S,Y<-S,X<math:sqrt(Y)+1,Y rem X==0]).

:-)

回复 原文
风吹雪碎 2024-07-14 09:36:42

到目前为止，我最快的代码（比 Andrea 的更快）是使用数组：

-module(seed4).
-export([get/1]).

get(N) -> WorkList = array:new([{size, N}, {default, empty}]),
          get(2, N, WorkList, []).

get(thats_the_end, _N, _WorkList, ResultList) -> lists:reverse(ResultList);
get(CurrentPrime, N, WorkList, ResultList) -> ModWorkList = markAsPrime(CurrentPrime, N, WorkList),
                                              NextPrime = findNextPrime(CurrentPrime + 1, N, WorkList),
                                              get(NextPrime, N, ModWorkList, [CurrentPrime|ResultList]).


markAsPrime(CurrentPrime, N, WorkList) when CurrentPrime =< N -> WorkListMod = replace(CurrentPrime, WorkList, prime),
                                                                 markAllMultiples(CurrentPrime, N, 2*CurrentPrime, WorkListMod).

markAllMultiples(_ThePrime, N, TheCurentMark, WorkList) when TheCurentMark > N -> WorkList;
markAllMultiples(ThePrime, N, TheCurrentMark, WorkList) -> WorkListMod = replace(TheCurrentMark, WorkList, marked),
                                                           markAllMultiples(ThePrime, N, TheCurrentMark + ThePrime, WorkListMod).

findNextPrime(Iterator, N, _WorkList) when Iterator > N -> thats_the_end;
findNextPrime(Iterator, N, WorkList) -> I = array:get(Iterator - 1, WorkList),
                                        if
                                          I =:= empty -> Iterator;
                                          true -> findNextPrime(Iterator + 1, N, WorkList)
                                        end.

replace(N, L, New) -> array:set(N - 1, New, L).

my fastest code so far (faster than Andrea's) is with using array:

-module(seed4).
-export([get/1]).

get(N) -> WorkList = array:new([{size, N}, {default, empty}]),
          get(2, N, WorkList, []).

get(thats_the_end, _N, _WorkList, ResultList) -> lists:reverse(ResultList);
get(CurrentPrime, N, WorkList, ResultList) -> ModWorkList = markAsPrime(CurrentPrime, N, WorkList),
                                              NextPrime = findNextPrime(CurrentPrime + 1, N, WorkList),
                                              get(NextPrime, N, ModWorkList, [CurrentPrime|ResultList]).


markAsPrime(CurrentPrime, N, WorkList) when CurrentPrime =< N -> WorkListMod = replace(CurrentPrime, WorkList, prime),
                                                                 markAllMultiples(CurrentPrime, N, 2*CurrentPrime, WorkListMod).

markAllMultiples(_ThePrime, N, TheCurentMark, WorkList) when TheCurentMark > N -> WorkList;
markAllMultiples(ThePrime, N, TheCurrentMark, WorkList) -> WorkListMod = replace(TheCurrentMark, WorkList, marked),
                                                           markAllMultiples(ThePrime, N, TheCurrentMark + ThePrime, WorkListMod).

findNextPrime(Iterator, N, _WorkList) when Iterator > N -> thats_the_end;
findNextPrime(Iterator, N, WorkList) -> I = array:get(Iterator - 1, WorkList),
                                        if
                                          I =:= empty -> Iterator;
                                          true -> findNextPrime(Iterator + 1, N, WorkList)
                                        end.

replace(N, L, New) -> array:set(N - 1, New, L).
回复 原文
柠栀 2024-07-14 09:36:41

这是一个简单（但不是非常快）的筛子实现：

-module(primes).
-export([sieve/1]).
-include_lib("eunit/include/eunit.hrl").

sieve([]) ->
    [];
sieve([H|T]) ->          
    List = lists:filter(fun(N) -> N rem H /= 0 end, T),
    [H|sieve(List)];
sieve(N) ->
    sieve(lists:seq(2,N)).

Here's a simple (but not terribly fast) sieve implementation:

-module(primes).
-export([sieve/1]).
-include_lib("eunit/include/eunit.hrl").

sieve([]) ->
    [];
sieve([H|T]) ->          
    List = lists:filter(fun(N) -> N rem H /= 0 end, T),
    [H|sieve(List)];
sieve(N) ->
    sieve(lists:seq(2,N)).
回复 原文
鞋纸虽美，但不合脚ㄋ〞 2024-07-14 09:36:41

这是我的筛子实现，它使用列表理解并尝试尾递归。 我在最后颠倒了列表，以便对素数进行排序：

primes(Prime, Max, Primes,Integers) when Prime > Max ->
    lists:reverse([Prime|Primes]) ++ Integers;
primes(Prime, Max, Primes, Integers) ->
    [NewPrime|NewIntegers] = [ X || X <- Integers, X rem Prime =/= 0 ],
    primes(NewPrime, Max, [Prime|Primes], NewIntegers).

primes(N) ->
    primes(2, round(math:sqrt(N)), [], lists:seq(3,N,2)). % skip odds

在我的 2ghz mac 上计算最多 200 万个素数大约需要 2.8 毫秒。

Here's my sieve implementation which uses list comprehensions and tries to be tail recursive. I reverse the list at the end so the primes are sorted:

primes(Prime, Max, Primes,Integers) when Prime > Max ->
    lists:reverse([Prime|Primes]) ++ Integers;
primes(Prime, Max, Primes, Integers) ->
    [NewPrime|NewIntegers] = [ X || X <- Integers, X rem Prime =/= 0 ],
    primes(NewPrime, Max, [Prime|Primes], NewIntegers).

primes(N) ->
    primes(2, round(math:sqrt(N)), [], lists:seq(3,N,2)). % skip odds

Takes approx 2.8 ms to calculate primes up to 2 mil on my 2ghz mac.

回复 原文
南汐寒笙箫 2024-07-14 09:36:41

我之前的帖子格式不正确。 这是代码的重新发布。 抱歉，乱发垃圾邮件...


-module(test).

%%-export([sum_primes/1]).
-compile(export_all).

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%Sum of all primes below Max. Will use sieve of Eratosthenes 
sum_primes(Max) ->
    LastCheck = round(math:sqrt(Max)),
    All = lists:seq(3, Max, 2), %note are creating odd-only array
    %%Primes = sieve(noref,All, LastCheck),
    Primes = spawn_sieve(All, LastCheck),
    lists:sum(Primes) + 2. %adding back the number 2 to the list


%%sieve of Eratosthenes
sieve(Ref,All, LastCheck) ->
    sieve(Ref,[], All, LastCheck).

sieve(noref,Primes, All = [Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    lists:reverse(Primes, All); %all known primes and all remaining from list (not sieved) are prime    
sieve({Pid,Ref},Primes, All=[Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    Pid ! {Ref,lists:reverse(Primes, All)}; 
sieve(Ref,Primes, [Cur|All2], LastCheck) ->
    %%All3 = lists:filter(fun(X) -> X rem Cur =/= 0 end, All2),
    All3 = lists_filter(Cur,All2),
    sieve(Ref,[Cur|Primes], All3,  LastCheck).


lists_filter(Cur,All2) ->
    lists_filter(Cur,All2,[]).

lists_filter(V,[H|T],L) ->
    case H rem V of
    0 ->
        lists_filter(V,T,L);
    _ ->
        lists_filter(V,T,[H|L])
    end;
lists_filter(_,[],L) ->
    lists:reverse(L).


%% This is a sloppy implementation ;)
spawn_sieve(All,Last) ->
    %% split the job
    {L1,L2} = lists:split(round(length(All)/2),All),
    Filters = filters(All,Last),
    L3 = lists:append(Filters,L2),
    Pid = self(),
    Ref1=make_ref(),
    Ref2=make_ref(),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref1},L1,Last]),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref2},L3,Last]),
    Res1=receive
         {Ref1,R1} ->
         {1,R1};
         {Ref2,R1} ->
         {2,R1}
     end,
    Res2= receive
          {Ref1,R2} ->
          {1,R2};
          {Ref2,R2} ->
          {2,R2}
      end,
    apnd(Filters,Res1,Res2).


filters([H|T],Last) when H 
    [H|filters(T,Last)];
filters([H|_],_) ->
    [H];
filters(_,_) ->
    [].


apnd(Filters,{1,N1},{2,N2}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters));
apnd(Filters,{2,N2},{1,N1}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters)).



subtract([H|L],[H|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L=[A|_],[B|_]) when A > B ->
    L;
subtract(L,[_|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L,[]) ->
    L.

My previous post did not get formatted correctly. Here is a repost of the code. Sorry for spamming...


-module(test).

%%-export([sum_primes/1]).
-compile(export_all).

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%Sum of all primes below Max. Will use sieve of Eratosthenes 
sum_primes(Max) ->
    LastCheck = round(math:sqrt(Max)),
    All = lists:seq(3, Max, 2), %note are creating odd-only array
    %%Primes = sieve(noref,All, LastCheck),
    Primes = spawn_sieve(All, LastCheck),
    lists:sum(Primes) + 2. %adding back the number 2 to the list


%%sieve of Eratosthenes
sieve(Ref,All, LastCheck) ->
    sieve(Ref,[], All, LastCheck).

sieve(noref,Primes, All = [Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    lists:reverse(Primes, All); %all known primes and all remaining from list (not sieved) are prime    
sieve({Pid,Ref},Primes, All=[Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    Pid ! {Ref,lists:reverse(Primes, All)}; 
sieve(Ref,Primes, [Cur|All2], LastCheck) ->
    %%All3 = lists:filter(fun(X) -> X rem Cur =/= 0 end, All2),
    All3 = lists_filter(Cur,All2),
    sieve(Ref,[Cur|Primes], All3,  LastCheck).


lists_filter(Cur,All2) ->
    lists_filter(Cur,All2,[]).

lists_filter(V,[H|T],L) ->
    case H rem V of
    0 ->
        lists_filter(V,T,L);
    _ ->
        lists_filter(V,T,[H|L])
    end;
lists_filter(_,[],L) ->
    lists:reverse(L).


%% This is a sloppy implementation ;)
spawn_sieve(All,Last) ->
    %% split the job
    {L1,L2} = lists:split(round(length(All)/2),All),
    Filters = filters(All,Last),
    L3 = lists:append(Filters,L2),
    Pid = self(),
    Ref1=make_ref(),
    Ref2=make_ref(),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref1},L1,Last]),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref2},L3,Last]),
    Res1=receive
         {Ref1,R1} ->
         {1,R1};
         {Ref2,R1} ->
         {2,R1}
     end,
    Res2= receive
          {Ref1,R2} ->
          {1,R2};
          {Ref2,R2} ->
          {2,R2}
      end,
    apnd(Filters,Res1,Res2).


filters([H|T],Last) when H 
    [H|filters(T,Last)];
filters([H|_],_) ->
    [H];
filters(_,_) ->
    [].


apnd(Filters,{1,N1},{2,N2}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters));
apnd(Filters,{2,N2},{1,N1}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters)).



subtract([H|L],[H|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L=[A|_],[B|_]) when A > B ->
    L;
subtract(L,[_|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L,[]) ->
    L.
回复 原文
梦一生花开无言 2024-07-14 09:36:41

我通过使用并发处理来解决这个问题。

来源

I approached the problem by using concurrent processing.

Source

回复 原文
九厘米的零° 2024-07-14 09:36:41

我没有详细研究这些，但我在下面测试了我的实现（我为欧拉项目挑战编写的），它比上述两个实现快几个数量级。 它非常慢，直到我消除了一些自定义函数并转而寻找列表：可以执行相同操作的函数。 学习这个教训是很好的，总是看看是否有一个库实现了你需要做的事情 - 它通常会更快！ 在 2.8GHz iMac 上，这可以在 3.6 秒内计算出最多 200 万个素数之和...

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%Sum of all primes below Max. Will use sieve of Eratosthenes 
sum_primes(Max) ->
    LastCheck = round(math:sqrt(Max)),
    All = lists:seq(3, Max, 2), %note are creating odd-only array
    Primes = sieve(All, Max, LastCheck),
    %io:format("Primes: ~p~n", [Primes]),
    lists:sum(Primes) + 2. %adding back the number 2 to the list

%sieve of Eratosthenes
sieve(All, Max, LastCheck) ->
    sieve([], All, Max, LastCheck).

sieve(Primes, All, Max, LastCheck) ->
    %swap the first element of All onto Primes 
    [Cur|All2] = All,
    Primes2 = [Cur|Primes],
    case Cur > LastCheck of 
        true ->
            lists:append(Primes2, All2); %all known primes and all remaining from list (not sieved) are prime
        false -> 
            All3 = lists:filter(fun(X) -> X rem Cur =/= 0 end, All2),
            sieve(Primes2, All3, Max, LastCheck)

    end.

I haven't studied these in detail, but I've tested my implementation below (that I wrote for a Project Euler challenge) and it's orders of magnitude faster than the above two implementations. It was excruciatingly slow until I eliminated some custom functions and instead looked for lists: functions that would do the same. It's good to learn the lesson to always see if there's a library implementation of something you need to do - it'll usually be faster! This calculates the sum of primes up to 2 million in 3.6 seconds on a 2.8GHz iMac...

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%Sum of all primes below Max. Will use sieve of Eratosthenes 
sum_primes(Max) ->
    LastCheck = round(math:sqrt(Max)),
    All = lists:seq(3, Max, 2), %note are creating odd-only array
    Primes = sieve(All, Max, LastCheck),
    %io:format("Primes: ~p~n", [Primes]),
    lists:sum(Primes) + 2. %adding back the number 2 to the list

%sieve of Eratosthenes
sieve(All, Max, LastCheck) ->
    sieve([], All, Max, LastCheck).

sieve(Primes, All, Max, LastCheck) ->
    %swap the first element of All onto Primes 
    [Cur|All2] = All,
    Primes2 = [Cur|Primes],
    case Cur > LastCheck of 
        true ->
            lists:append(Primes2, All2); %all known primes and all remaining from list (not sieved) are prime
        false -> 
            All3 = lists:filter(fun(X) -> X rem Cur =/= 0 end, All2),
            sieve(Primes2, All3, Max, LastCheck)

    end.
回复 原文
慕烟庭风 2024-07-14 09:36:41

我有点喜欢这个主题，即素数，所以我开始稍微修改 BarryE 的代码，并通过制作我自己的 Lists_filter 函数，设法使其速度提高了 70% 左右，并且可以利用我的两个 CPU。 我还使两个版本之间的切换变得容易。 测试运行显示：

61> timer:tc(test,sum_primes,[2000000]).
{2458537,142913970581}

代码：

-module(test).

%%-export([sum_primes/1]).
-compile(export_all).

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%Sum of all primes below Max. Will use sieve of Eratosthenes 
sum_primes(Max) ->
    LastCheck = round(math:sqrt(Max)),
    All = lists:seq(3, Max, 2), %note are creating odd-only array
    %%Primes = sieve(noref,All, LastCheck),
    Primes = spawn_sieve(All, LastCheck),
    lists:sum(Primes) + 2. %adding back the number 2 to the list


%%sieve of Eratosthenes
sieve(Ref,All, LastCheck) ->
    sieve(Ref,[], All, LastCheck).

sieve(noref,Primes, All = [Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    lists:reverse(Primes, All); %all known primes and all remaining from list (not sieved) are prime    
sieve({Pid,Ref},Primes, All=[Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    Pid ! {Ref,lists:reverse(Primes, All)}; 
sieve(Ref,Primes, [Cur|All2], LastCheck) ->
    %%All3 = lists:filter(fun(X) -> X rem Cur =/= 0 end, All2),
    All3 = lists_filter(Cur,All2),
    sieve(Ref,[Cur|Primes], All3,  LastCheck).


lists_filter(Cur,All2) ->
    lists_filter(Cur,All2,[]).

lists_filter(V,[H|T],L) ->
    case H rem V of
    0 ->
        lists_filter(V,T,L);
    _ ->
        lists_filter(V,T,[H|L])
    end;
lists_filter(_,[],L) ->
    lists:reverse(L).



%% This is a sloppy implementation ;)
spawn_sieve(All,Last) ->
    %% split the job
    {L1,L2} = lists:split(round(length(All)/2),All),
    Filters = filters(All,Last),
    %%io:format("F:~p~n",[Filters]),
    L3 = lists:append(Filters,L2),
    %%io:format("L1:~w~n",[L1]),
    %%    io:format("L2:~w~n",[L3]),
    %%lists_filter(Cur,All2,[]).
    Pid = self(),
    Ref1=make_ref(),
    Ref2=make_ref(),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref1},L1,Last]),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref2},L3,Last]),
    Res1=receive
         {Ref1,R1} ->
         {1,R1};
         {Ref2,R1} ->
         {2,R1}
     end,
    Res2= receive
          {Ref1,R2} ->
          {1,R2};
          {Ref2,R2} ->
          {2,R2}
      end,
    apnd(Filters,Res1,Res2).


filters([H|T],Last) when H 
    [H|filters(T,Last)];
filters([H|_],_) ->
    [H];
filters(_,_) ->
    [].


apnd(Filters,{1,N1},{2,N2}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters));
apnd(Filters,{2,N2},{1,N1}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters)).



subtract([H|L],[H|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L=[A|_],[B|_]) when A > B ->
    L;
subtract(L,[_|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L,[]) ->
    L.

I kind of like this subject, primes that is, so I started to modify BarryE's code a bit and I manged to make it about 70% faster by making my own lists_filter function and made it possible to utilize both of my CPUs. I also made it easy to swap between to two version. A test run shows:

61> timer:tc(test,sum_primes,[2000000]).
{2458537,142913970581}

Code:


-module(test).

%%-export([sum_primes/1]).
-compile(export_all).

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%Sum of all primes below Max. Will use sieve of Eratosthenes 
sum_primes(Max) ->
    LastCheck = round(math:sqrt(Max)),
    All = lists:seq(3, Max, 2), %note are creating odd-only array
    %%Primes = sieve(noref,All, LastCheck),
    Primes = spawn_sieve(All, LastCheck),
    lists:sum(Primes) + 2. %adding back the number 2 to the list


%%sieve of Eratosthenes
sieve(Ref,All, LastCheck) ->
    sieve(Ref,[], All, LastCheck).

sieve(noref,Primes, All = [Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    lists:reverse(Primes, All); %all known primes and all remaining from list (not sieved) are prime    
sieve({Pid,Ref},Primes, All=[Cur|_], LastCheck) when Cur > LastCheck ->
    Pid ! {Ref,lists:reverse(Primes, All)}; 
sieve(Ref,Primes, [Cur|All2], LastCheck) ->
    %%All3 = lists:filter(fun(X) -> X rem Cur =/= 0 end, All2),
    All3 = lists_filter(Cur,All2),
    sieve(Ref,[Cur|Primes], All3,  LastCheck).


lists_filter(Cur,All2) ->
    lists_filter(Cur,All2,[]).

lists_filter(V,[H|T],L) ->
    case H rem V of
    0 ->
        lists_filter(V,T,L);
    _ ->
        lists_filter(V,T,[H|L])
    end;
lists_filter(_,[],L) ->
    lists:reverse(L).



%% This is a sloppy implementation ;)
spawn_sieve(All,Last) ->
    %% split the job
    {L1,L2} = lists:split(round(length(All)/2),All),
    Filters = filters(All,Last),
    %%io:format("F:~p~n",[Filters]),
    L3 = lists:append(Filters,L2),
    %%io:format("L1:~w~n",[L1]),
    %%    io:format("L2:~w~n",[L3]),
    %%lists_filter(Cur,All2,[]).
    Pid = self(),
    Ref1=make_ref(),
    Ref2=make_ref(),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref1},L1,Last]),
    erlang:spawn(?MODULE,sieve,[{Pid,Ref2},L3,Last]),
    Res1=receive
         {Ref1,R1} ->
         {1,R1};
         {Ref2,R1} ->
         {2,R1}
     end,
    Res2= receive
          {Ref1,R2} ->
          {1,R2};
          {Ref2,R2} ->
          {2,R2}
      end,
    apnd(Filters,Res1,Res2).


filters([H|T],Last) when H 
    [H|filters(T,Last)];
filters([H|_],_) ->
    [H];
filters(_,_) ->
    [].


apnd(Filters,{1,N1},{2,N2}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters));
apnd(Filters,{2,N2},{1,N1}) ->
    lists:append(N1,subtract(N2,Filters)).



subtract([H|L],[H|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L=[A|_],[B|_]) when A > B ->
    L;
subtract(L,[_|T]) ->
    subtract(L,T);
subtract(L,[]) ->
    L.
回复 原文
哆啦不做梦 2024-07-14 09:36:41

你可以向你的老板展示这个： http://www.sics.se/~joe/apachevsyaws .html。 其他一些（经典？）erlang 参数是：

-不间断操作，可以动态加载新代码。

- 易于调试，不再需要分析核心转储。

- 易于使用多核/CPU

- 易于使用集群吗？

-谁想处理指针之类的东西？ 这不是21世纪吗？ ;)

一些错误：
- 写东西可能看起来简单快捷，但性能可能很糟糕。 如果我
想要快速制作一些东西，我通常最终会编写相同的 2-4 个不同版本
功能。 通常，您需要以鹰眼的态度来解决可能会出现问题的问题。
与使用的也有点不同。

  • 在列表中查找内容> 大约 1000 个元素很慢，请尝试使用 ets 表。

  • 字符串“abc”占用的空间比 3 个字节多得多。 所以尝试使用二进制文件（这很痛苦）。

总而言之，我认为在用 erlang 编写东西时要始终牢记性能问题。 Erlang 兄弟们需要解决这个问题，我想他们会的。

you could show your boss this: http://www.sics.se/~joe/apachevsyaws.html. And some other (classic?) erlang arguments are:

-nonstop operation, new code can be loaded on the fly.

-easy to debug, no more core dumps to analyse.

-easy to utilize multi core/CPUs

-easy to utilize clusters maybe?

-who wants to deal with pointers and stuff? Is this not the 21 century? ;)

Some pifalls:
- it might look easy and fast to write something, but the performance can suck. If I
want to make something fast I usually end up writing 2-4 different versions of the same
function. And often you need to take a hawk eye aproach to problems which might be a
little bit different from what one is used too.

  • looking up things in lists > about 1000 elements is slow, try using ets tables.

  • the string "abc" takes a lot more space than 3 bytes. So try to use binaries, (which is a pain).

All in all i think the performance issue is something to keep in mind at all times when writing something in erlang. The Erlang dudes need to work that out, and I think they will.

回复 原文
凉薄对峙 2024-07-14 09:36:41

在这里查看 4 种不同的实现，用于在 Erlang 中查找素数（其中两个是“真正的”筛子）和性能测量结果：

http:// /caylespandon.blogspot.com/2009/01/in-euler-problem-10-we-are-asked-to.html

Have a look here to find 4 different implementations for finding prime numbers in Erlang (two of which are "real" sieves) and for performance measurement results:

http://caylespandon.blogspot.com/2009/01/in-euler-problem-10-we-are-asked-to.html

回复 原文
蓬勃野心 2024-07-14 09:36:41

足够简单，准确实现算法，并且不使用库函数（仅模式匹配和列表理解）。
确实不是很强大。 我只是试图让它尽可能简单。

-module(primes).
-export([primes/1, primes/2]).

primes(X) -> sieve(range(2, X)).
primes(X, Y) -> remove(primes(X), primes(Y)).

range(X, X) -> [X];
range(X, Y) -> [X | range(X + 1, Y)].

sieve([X]) -> [X];
sieve([H | T]) -> [H | sieve(remove([H * X || X <-[H | T]], T))].

remove(_, []) -> [];
remove([H | X], [H | Y]) -> remove(X, Y);
remove(X, [H | Y]) -> [H | remove(X, Y)].

Simple enough, implements exactly the algorithm, and uses no library functions (only pattern matching and list comprehension).
Not very powerful, indeed. I only tried to make it as simple as possible.

-module(primes).
-export([primes/1, primes/2]).

primes(X) -> sieve(range(2, X)).
primes(X, Y) -> remove(primes(X), primes(Y)).

range(X, X) -> [X];
range(X, Y) -> [X | range(X + 1, Y)].

sieve([X]) -> [X];
sieve([H | T]) -> [H | sieve(remove([H * X || X <-[H | T]], T))].

remove(_, []) -> [];
remove([H | X], [H | Y]) -> remove(X, Y);
remove(X, [H | Y]) -> [H | remove(X, Y)].
回复 原文
傲鸠 2024-07-14 09:36:41

这是我的eratophenes实施C&C的筛子，请：

    -module(sieve).
    -export([find/2,mark/2,primes/1]).

    primes(N) -> [2|lists:reverse(primes(lists:seq(2,N),2,[]))].

    primes(_,0,[_|T]) -> T;
    primes(L,P,Primes) -> NewList = mark(L,P),
        NewP = find(NewList,P),
        primes(NewList,NewP,[NewP|Primes]).

    find([],_) -> 0;
    find([H|_],P) when H > P -> H;
    find([_|T],P) -> find(T,P). 


    mark(L,P) -> lists:reverse(mark(L,P,2,[])).

    mark([],_,_,NewList) -> NewList;
    mark([_|T],P,Counter,NewList) when Counter rem P =:= 0 -> mark(T,P,Counter+1,[P|NewList]);
    mark([H|T],P,Counter,NewList) -> mark(T,P,Counter+1,[H|NewList]).

Here is my sieve of eratophenes implementation C&C please:

    -module(sieve).
    -export([find/2,mark/2,primes/1]).

    primes(N) -> [2|lists:reverse(primes(lists:seq(2,N),2,[]))].

    primes(_,0,[_|T]) -> T;
    primes(L,P,Primes) -> NewList = mark(L,P),
        NewP = find(NewList,P),
        primes(NewList,NewP,[NewP|Primes]).

    find([],_) -> 0;
    find([H|_],P) when H > P -> H;
    find([_|T],P) -> find(T,P). 


    mark(L,P) -> lists:reverse(mark(L,P,2,[])).

    mark([],_,_,NewList) -> NewList;
    mark([_|T],P,Counter,NewList) when Counter rem P =:= 0 -> mark(T,P,Counter+1,[P|NewList]);
    mark([H|T],P,Counter,NewList) -> mark(T,P,Counter+1,[H|NewList]).
回复 原文
~没有更多了~

关于作者

相守太难

暂无简介

0 文章
0 评论
22 人气
发私信

相关话题

更多

热门标签

操作系统 程序设计 IT运维 Linux系统管理 JavaScript 服务器应用 solaris C/C++ PHP Shell BSD Vue.js aix Oracle Python HTML 系统管理 HTML5 CSS 前端
更多

推荐作者

linfzu01

文章 0 评论 0

§对你不离不弃

文章 0 评论 0

可遇━不可求

文章 0 评论 0

枕梦

文章 0 评论 0

qq_3LFa8Q

文章 0 评论 0

JP

文章 0 评论 0

更多

友情链接

文江博客
    我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站，即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
    原文