For structure and look+feel, consider using a framework such as DocBook.
DocBook uses an XML markup schema that makes you think about how your document should be arranged. There are XSL transformations to convert it to common formats like HTML and PDF with a whole load of config options to make it look the way you want. And it's open-source (free). There are downsides of course: the schema's pretty big, and editing can be hard work without a good XML editor.
发布评论
评论（2）
这个链接有一些优点。 每个观点都以清晰的语言和内在的理由提出。
http://www.klariti.com/ Technical-writing/User-Guides-Tutorial.shtml
以下是上述文章所涵盖主题的完整列表：
This link has some strong points. Each point is presented with clear speech and with inline justifications.
http://www.klariti.com/technical-writing/User-Guides-Tutorial.shtml
Here is the complete list of the topics covered on the aforementioned article:
对于结构和外观+感觉，请考虑使用 DocBook 等框架。
DocBook 使用 XML 标记模式，让您思考应该如何排列文档。 有 XSL 转换可以将其转换为常见格式，例如 HTML 和 PDF，并带有大量配置选项，使其看起来像您想要的那样。 而且它是开源的（免费）。 当然也有缺点：模式相当大，如果没有好的 XML 编辑器，编辑工作可能会很困难。
示例： http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/WhoUsesDocBook
For structure and look+feel, consider using a framework such as DocBook.
DocBook uses an XML markup schema that makes you think about how your document should be arranged. There are XSL transformations to convert it to common formats like HTML and PDF with a whole load of config options to make it look the way you want. And it's open-source (free). There are downsides of course: the schema's pretty big, and editing can be hard work without a good XML editor.
Examples: http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/WhoUsesDocBook