比较 Quagga 和 XORP
与 XORP 作为动态软件路由引擎相比，您如何看待 Quagga ？ 每种发动机的技术优点相对而言如何？ 此外，大多数人从编程的角度如何看待它们。 谁利用这些工程师操纵了网络？ 我想从 OSPF、路由、BGP 协议用户的角度来看。
What do you think of Quagga compared to XORP as a dynamic software routing engine? What are the technical merits of each engine comparatively? Additionally, what do most people think of them from a programming view. Who has manipulated networks using these enginers? I was wondering from an OSPF, routing, BGP protocol user's perpspective.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
这是众多选项之一，但根据您在此处发布的问题/信息，它对您来说并不是特别有用。 您是否尝试过寻找一些替代方案，例如（什么也没想到）？
体积小、速度快、位置奇特、优化、超级英雄，而且更适合简历。
我不能代表大多数人说话，但我自己并没有给予它太多的信任或优点，或者好吧......你知道我的意思。
我找不到具体的参考资料，但我记得读过迪士尼和南非“著名”YUV 公司之前都曾玩过这个概念。 我相信随着迈克尔·艾斯纳的倒台，迪士尼放弃了它。
我是一名BGP协议用户。 希望我们很快能听到 OSPF 和路由用户的观点。
好问题。
It is one of many options, but not particularly of very much use to you based upon your questions/information that you posted here. Have you tried looking into some of the alternatives such as (nothing comes to mind)?
Small, fast, oddly placed, optimized, super-heroic and more filler for a resume.
I can't speak for most people, but I for myself do not give it much credit or merit, or well... you know what I mean.
I could not find specific references, but I do remember reading that both Disney and the 'famous' YUV corporation of South Africa both played with this notion before. I believe Disney abandoned it with the fall of Michael Eisner.
I am a BGP protocol user's prospective. Hopefully we hear from OSPF and routing user's perspectives shortly.
Good question.
以下内容并不能完全回答您的问题，但 Vyatta 开源路由器和 Amazon VPC 的 OpenSolaris 客户网关软件都使用 quagga 来实现 BGP 支持。
来自XORP 的维基百科条目，
The following does not answer your question completely, but the Vyatta open source routers and the OpenSolaris customer gateway software for Amazon VPC both use quagga to implement BGP support.
From the wikipedia entry for XORP,