我是用于管理软件项目的 http://trac.edgewall.org/'>trac 的忠实粉丝。 它通过集成的 wiki 和源代码控制提供任务和错误管理。
I'm a big fan of http://trac.edgewall.org/'>trac for managing software projects. It provides task and bug management with integrated wiki and source control.
We have been using FogBugz for managing several projects (10+) and clients (20+) for more than 4 years.
We have a project for each product and another project for each client. In this way I can control the requirements for each product and the pending activities related to each client.
Try Omniplan if you're on a Mac. I find it just makes sense. I also find I don't end up fighting the interface and instead concentrate on using it to help me plan better.
Edit: It goes well with OmniFocus and no, I don't work for the Omni Group :)
Trac（正如 Mark Roddy 提到的）也很好，因为它集成了 wiki、任务和缺陷管理，因此如果您还没有这些工具，那么它可能是一个有趣的工具。
If you are into Agile methods (or even if not) you could try some of the Agile tools out there. Look in http://www.agile-tools.net/ for some comparisons. I use xplanner at work where we coordinate requirements and work over iterations among several teams. It has its quirks but it generaly gets the work done and allows for some useful agile structure. I am sure some other will have preferences for more mature tools.
Trac (as Mark Roddy mentioned) is also nice, because it integrates a wiki, task and defect management, so it can be an interesting tool if you have none of those already in place.
I should say that we use Mantis now, but I wish it was better. I wish I could use it for customer-facing queries, I with I could open and assign issues by email.
ScrumWorks Pro looks promising, but amazingly expensive for me, with 15 developers.
I'm using the customer support, project planning and issue management portions of OpenERP. Having your issues and feature requests, along with the tasks required to get them done on the same CRM that allows you to manage your customers is a big benefit.
I have used SourceGear Vault to manage all our software projects. Our business nature is very much driven by project basis - typically I have 5 active projects running at one period of time.
tools are not the answer, unless you already have the knowledge, organization, and self-discipline to use them well. i highly recommend Getting Things Done
This may sound really old-tech, but a different set of notepads for each project. Now, hear me out.
I know that notepads aren't searchable, and they aren't indexed, etc. But they will have meeting dates and times (if you've been taking notes during meetings, even on the phone), they have the ability of never crashing, and they're future proof in the event of wondering what you did a few years back but can't remember if the old project files made it to your new hard drive.
But the biggest reason is CYA-- logbooks and notepads can be used in the event of someone suing you as legal documents, especially if you've been diligent about dates. It might also work during patent discussions as well, showing a clear date and time of ideas being made. During another life, I worked in biology labs, and electronic record keeping, because it's so fickle, wasn't allowed for the legal reasons of being able to show that the work you did was your own. That attitude has permeated my own project notetaking, and helping to keep track of everything I need to get done.
发布评论
评论（10）
我是用于管理软件项目的 http://trac.edgewall.org/'>trac 的忠实粉丝。 它通过集成的 wiki 和源代码控制提供任务和错误管理。
I'm a big fan of http://trac.edgewall.org/'>trac for managing software projects. It provides task and bug management with integrated wiki and source control.
我们已经使用 FogBugz 来管理多个项目 (10+) 和客户 (20+) 超过4年。
我们为每种产品都有一个项目，为每个客户都有另一个项目。 通过这种方式，我可以控制每个产品的需求以及与每个客户相关的待处理活动。
We have been using FogBugz for managing several projects (10+) and clients (20+) for more than 4 years.
We have a project for each product and another project for each client. In this way I can control the requirements for each product and the pending activities related to each client.
如果您使用的是 Mac，请尝试 Omniplan。 我觉得这很有道理。 我还发现我最终不会与界面作斗争，而是专注于使用它来帮助我更好地计划。
编辑：它与 OmniFocus 配合良好，不，我不为 Omni Group 工作:)
Try Omniplan if you're on a Mac. I find it just makes sense. I also find I don't end up fighting the interface and instead concentrate on using it to help me plan better.
Edit: It goes well with OmniFocus and no, I don't work for the Omni Group :)
如果您喜欢敏捷方法（或者即使不喜欢），您可以尝试一些敏捷工具。 请查看 http://www.agile-tools.net/ 进行一些比较。 我在工作中使用 xplanner，协调需求并在多个团队之间进行迭代。 它有其怪癖，但通常可以完成工作并允许一些有用的敏捷结构。 我确信其他人会偏好更成熟的工具。
Trac（正如 Mark Roddy 提到的）也很好，因为它集成了 wiki、任务和缺陷管理，因此如果您还没有这些工具，那么它可能是一个有趣的工具。
If you are into Agile methods (or even if not) you could try some of the Agile tools out there. Look in http://www.agile-tools.net/ for some comparisons. I use xplanner at work where we coordinate requirements and work over iterations among several teams. It has its quirks but it generaly gets the work done and allows for some useful agile structure. I am sure some other will have preferences for more mature tools.
Trac (as Mark Roddy mentioned) is also nice, because it integrates a wiki, task and defect management, so it can be an interesting tool if you have none of those already in place.
我应该说我们现在使用 Mantis，但我希望它更好。 我希望我可以将它用于面向客户的查询，我可以通过电子邮件打开和分配问题。
ScrumWorks Pro 看起来很有前途，但对我来说却贵得惊人，因为我有 15 名开发人员。
AccuNote 可能是一个选择，但对我来说是新的
I should say that we use Mantis now, but I wish it was better. I wish I could use it for customer-facing queries, I with I could open and assign issues by email.
ScrumWorks Pro looks promising, but amazingly expensive for me, with 15 developers.
AccuNote may be an option, but it is new to me
我正在使用 OpenERP 的客户支持、项目规划和问题管理部分。 在同一个 CRM 上处理您的问题和功能请求，以及完成这些问题所需的任务，让您能够管理客户，这是一个很大的好处。
I'm using the customer support, project planning and issue management portions of OpenERP. Having your issues and feature requests, along with the tasks required to get them done on the same CRM that allows you to manage your customers is a big benefit.
我使用 SourceGear Vault 来管理我们所有的软件项目。 我们的业务性质很大程度上是由项目基础驱动的 - 通常我会同时运行 5 个活跃项目。
I have used SourceGear Vault to manage all our software projects. Our business nature is very much driven by project basis - typically I have 5 active projects running at one period of time.
您应该看看 No Kahuna 易于使用； 免费和付费版本； 积极、反应灵敏的开发团队。
You should have a look at No Kahuna Easy to use; Free and Pay versions; active, responsive development team.
工具并不是答案，除非您已经具备良好使用工具的知识、组织和自律。 我强烈推荐把事情做好
tools are not the answer, unless you already have the knowledge, organization, and self-discipline to use them well. i highly recommend Getting Things Done
这听起来可能确实是老技术，但每个项目都有一套不同的记事本。 现在，听我说完。
我知道记事本不可搜索，也无法索引等。但它们会有会议日期和时间（如果您在会议期间记笔记，甚至在电话上记笔记），它们具有永远不会崩溃的能力，如果您想知道几年前您做了什么但不记得旧项目文件是否已保存到您的新硬盘驱动器，它们将成为未来的证明。
但最大的原因是 CYA——日志和记事本可以在有人起诉你的情况下用作法律文件，特别是如果你一直在注意日期的话。 它也可能在专利讨论期间发挥作用，显示提出想法的明确日期和时间。 在另一生中，我在生物实验室工作，电子记录保存，因为它是如此变化无常，出于法律原因不允许使用电子记录来证明你所做的工作是你自己的。 这种态度已经渗透到我自己的项目笔记中，并帮助跟踪我需要完成的一切。
This may sound really old-tech, but a different set of notepads for each project. Now, hear me out.
I know that notepads aren't searchable, and they aren't indexed, etc. But they will have meeting dates and times (if you've been taking notes during meetings, even on the phone), they have the ability of never crashing, and they're future proof in the event of wondering what you did a few years back but can't remember if the old project files made it to your new hard drive.
But the biggest reason is CYA-- logbooks and notepads can be used in the event of someone suing you as legal documents, especially if you've been diligent about dates. It might also work during patent discussions as well, showing a clear date and time of ideas being made. During another life, I worked in biology labs, and electronic record keeping, because it's so fickle, wasn't allowed for the legal reasons of being able to show that the work you did was your own. That attitude has permeated my own project notetaking, and helping to keep track of everything I need to get done.