如果您想使用相同的安装，您应该认真考虑远程桌面服务器/客户端解决方案，该解决方案捆绑到 XP 的每个 Windows 操作系统中。 基本上，这个应用程序使用高度压缩的图像显示从远程桌面到本地桌面的视图； 即使通过低带宽互联网连接也能正常工作 虽然 XP 版本只能同时处理一个用户，但 Windows Server 2003 中的版本（我猜还有 Windows Server 2008）可以处理多个用户（最多达到一定限制）。
缺点和副作用包括：
通过 RDC 的虚拟 PC 速度很慢
任何使用 3D 加速的东西都会很慢（至少使用 XP/2003）
If you want to work with the same installation, you should seriously consider the Remote Desktop Server/Client solution, bundled into every windows OS from XP. Basically, this app displays the view from your remote desktop to your local one, using highly compressed images; this works even via low-bandwidth internet connections While the XP version can only handle one user simultaneously, the one in Windows Server 2003 (and in Windows Server 2008, I presume) can handle multiple users (up to a certain limit).
Disadvantages, and side-effects include:
virtual pc via RDC is slow
anything using the 3d acceleration will be slow (at least using XP/2003)
VMWare 的性能非常好，我可以在笔记本电脑上同时运行 SQL Server 切片、Web 服务器切片和开发。 VM 切片驻留在 USB 2 便携式驱动器上，可以轻松在笔记本电脑和台式机之间移植。
VM 控制台非常适合访问每个环境，并且根据您使用 NAT 与桥接设置的配置，您可以 UNC 到切片上的共享。
这样做的一个很好的副产品是，如果您的主机急剧下降，您可以快速恢复您的开发环境。
Performance of VMWare is very good, and I can run a SQL Server slice, a web server slice and develop on my laptop simultaneously. The VM slices reside on a USB 2 portable drive and make it easy to port between my laptop and desktop.
VM Console works well for accessing each environment, and depending on the configuration you set up with NAT vs. Bridging you can UNC to shares on slice.
The nice by-product of this is that should you host machine take a nose dive you can quickly recover your development environment.
Well, you don't say what OSs are involved, so.....
For windows, I find that Remote Desktop works as well or better than anything else, although if you pay for the RealVNC version with the mirror driver, that's supposed to be as good. For off site access for windows, www.logmein.com (the free version) works very well.
If Unixes are involved, then VNC is definitely the way to go, there are various solutions for doing this remotely. Everything from redirection servers, to just forwarding a port in your firewall to an ssh server and setting up the various tunnels.
Personally, I would go down the route of using a virtual workstation with some remote logon software. The network performance of VMWare has always been good in my experience, and depending on the OS, there may be a decent remote logon provided.
就性能而言，使用 Linux 作为 VMWare 的主机可以提供非常好的系统资源管理。 基于 Windows 的虚拟机不仅能够吞噬内存，而且仍然可以在需要时获取内存。
我整天在 Visual Studio 2008 上的虚拟 Vista 工作站上进行 C# 开发，并且一次打开 3-4 个不同的解决方案以及通过无线 VPN 连接的另一台计算机上的 RDP 上的正常内容，绝对没有任何问题。
我可以切换到主机操作系统，它甚至根本不会触及交换空间。 就我而言，这是一种很好的工作方式。
I am a consultant and tend to work in a variety of environments. I carry a Thinkpad running VMWare Server over Ubuntu64 with 4GB of RAM. I've got a 320GB secondary hard drive that I use just for VM's and have 25 or so different virtual machines that I boot up as the circumstances demand.
They're a mix of Linux servers and workstations, Vista workstations and XP Workstations. I rarely use the VMWare server console. I access every one of them via one of the remote access methods.
For Linux, I usually install FreeNX or NXServer for desktop access and just SSH for commandline. On Windows, I always use Remote Desktop (RDP), but, on XP, that only works on the "Pro" versions, not the "Home" versions. If all else fails, I install VNC and use that. VNC is at the bottom of my list because it really is a last resort. The only thing it's better than is not actually being able to use the machine.
However, NX on Linux and RDP on Windows work WAY better than VNC. Other than little things like font smoothing and fancy desktop effects, the only big glitch would be if you are doing much with video or audio or DirectX-based stuff. Things like YouTube or other video do NOT like to work with any remote desktop protocol that I know of.
As far as performance, using Linux as a host for VMWare provides really good management of system resources. The Windows-based VM's aren't able to just gobble up memory, but still get it when they need to.
I do C# development all day in a virtual Vista workstation on Visual Studio 2008 and have absolutely no problems having 3-4 different solutions all open at once along with the normal stuff alongside over RDP on another machine, connected via wireless VPN.
I can flip over to the host OS and it won't even be touching swap space at all. As far as I'm concerned, it's a great way to work.
发布评论
评论（6）
如果您想使用相同的安装，您应该认真考虑远程桌面服务器/客户端解决方案，该解决方案捆绑到 XP 的每个 Windows 操作系统中。 基本上，这个应用程序使用高度压缩的图像显示从远程桌面到本地桌面的视图； 即使通过低带宽互联网连接也能正常工作
虽然 XP 版本只能同时处理一个用户，但 Windows Server 2003 中的版本（我猜还有 Windows Server 2008）可以处理多个用户（最多达到一定限制）。
缺点和副作用包括：
If you want to work with the same installation, you should seriously consider the Remote Desktop Server/Client solution, bundled into every windows OS from XP. Basically, this app displays the view from your remote desktop to your local one, using highly compressed images; this works even via low-bandwidth internet connections
While the XP version can only handle one user simultaneously, the one in Windows Server 2003 (and in Windows Server 2008, I presume) can handle multiple users (up to a certain limit).
Disadvantages, and side-effects include:
VMWare 的性能非常好，我可以在笔记本电脑上同时运行 SQL Server 切片、Web 服务器切片和开发。 VM 切片驻留在 USB 2 便携式驱动器上，可以轻松在笔记本电脑和台式机之间移植。
VM 控制台非常适合访问每个环境，并且根据您使用 NAT 与桥接设置的配置，您可以 UNC 到切片上的共享。
这样做的一个很好的副产品是，如果您的主机急剧下降，您可以快速恢复您的开发环境。
Performance of VMWare is very good, and I can run a SQL Server slice, a web server slice and develop on my laptop simultaneously. The VM slices reside on a USB 2 portable drive and make it easy to port between my laptop and desktop.
VM Console works well for accessing each environment, and depending on the configuration you set up with NAT vs. Bridging you can UNC to shares on slice.
The nice by-product of this is that should you host machine take a nose dive you can quickly recover your development environment.
好吧，你没有说涉及哪些操作系统，所以......
对于Windows，我发现远程桌面比其他任何东西都好用，甚至更好，尽管如果你支付带有镜像驱动程序的RealVNC版本，那应该是一样好。
对于 Windows 的异地访问，www.logmein.com（免费版本）效果很好。
如果涉及 Unix，那么 VNC 绝对是最佳选择，有多种解决方案可以远程执行此操作。 从重定向服务器到将防火墙中的端口转发到 ssh 服务器以及设置各种隧道，一切都应有尽有。
Well, you don't say what OSs are involved, so.....
For windows, I find that Remote Desktop works as well or better than anything else, although if you pay for the RealVNC version with the mirror driver, that's supposed to be as good.
For off site access for windows, www.logmein.com (the free version) works very well.
If Unixes are involved, then VNC is definitely the way to go, there are various solutions for doing this remotely. Everything from redirection servers, to just forwarding a port in your firewall to an ssh server and setting up the various tunnels.
我想您可以接受 Logmein Free。 [如果您想要这些功能，则可以选择专业版]
I guess you can live with Logmein Free. [Or Pro if u want those features]
就我个人而言，我会选择使用虚拟工作站和一些远程登录软件。 根据我的经验，VMWare 的网络性能一直很好，并且根据操作系统的不同，可能会提供不错的远程登录功能。
Personally, I would go down the route of using a virtual workstation with some remote logon software. The network performance of VMWare has always been good in my experience, and depending on the OS, there may be a decent remote logon provided.
我是一名顾问，倾向于在各种环境中工作。 我携带一台 Thinkpad，在 Ubuntu64 上运行 VMWare Server，具有 4GB RAM。 我有一个 320GB 的辅助硬盘驱动器，仅用于虚拟机，并且有大约 25 个不同的虚拟机，我可以根据情况需要启动这些虚拟机。
它们是 Linux 服务器和工作站、Vista 工作站和 XP 工作站的混合体。 我很少使用VMWare服务器控制台。 我通过一种远程访问方法访问它们中的每一个。
对于 Linux，我通常安装 FreeNX 或 NXServer 进行桌面访问，仅安装 SSH 进行命令行。 在 Windows 上，我总是使用远程桌面 (RDP)，但是在 XP 上，它仅适用于“专业”版本，不适用于“家庭”版本。 如果一切都失败了，我会安装 VNC 并使用它。 VNC 位于我的列表的底部，因为它确实是最后的手段。 唯一比实际无法使用这台机器更好的事情。
然而，Linux 上的 NX 和 Windows 上的 RDP 比 VNC 工作得更好。 除了字体平滑和精美的桌面效果等小事情之外，唯一的大问题是您对视频、音频或基于 DirectX 的内容进行了大量处理。 YouTube 或其他视频之类的东西不喜欢与我所知道的任何远程桌面协议一起使用。
就性能而言，使用 Linux 作为 VMWare 的主机可以提供非常好的系统资源管理。 基于 Windows 的虚拟机不仅能够吞噬内存，而且仍然可以在需要时获取内存。
我整天在 Visual Studio 2008 上的虚拟 Vista 工作站上进行 C# 开发，并且一次打开 3-4 个不同的解决方案以及通过无线 VPN 连接的另一台计算机上的 RDP 上的正常内容，绝对没有任何问题。
我可以切换到主机操作系统，它甚至根本不会触及交换空间。 就我而言，这是一种很好的工作方式。
I am a consultant and tend to work in a variety of environments. I carry a Thinkpad running VMWare Server over Ubuntu64 with 4GB of RAM. I've got a 320GB secondary hard drive that I use just for VM's and have 25 or so different virtual machines that I boot up as the circumstances demand.
They're a mix of Linux servers and workstations, Vista workstations and XP Workstations. I rarely use the VMWare server console. I access every one of them via one of the remote access methods.
For Linux, I usually install FreeNX or NXServer for desktop access and just SSH for commandline. On Windows, I always use Remote Desktop (RDP), but, on XP, that only works on the "Pro" versions, not the "Home" versions. If all else fails, I install VNC and use that. VNC is at the bottom of my list because it really is a last resort. The only thing it's better than is not actually being able to use the machine.
However, NX on Linux and RDP on Windows work WAY better than VNC. Other than little things like font smoothing and fancy desktop effects, the only big glitch would be if you are doing much with video or audio or DirectX-based stuff. Things like YouTube or other video do NOT like to work with any remote desktop protocol that I know of.
As far as performance, using Linux as a host for VMWare provides really good management of system resources. The Windows-based VM's aren't able to just gobble up memory, but still get it when they need to.
I do C# development all day in a virtual Vista workstation on Visual Studio 2008 and have absolutely no problems having 3-4 different solutions all open at once along with the normal stuff alongside over RDP on another machine, connected via wireless VPN.
I can flip over to the host OS and it won't even be touching swap space at all. As far as I'm concerned, it's a great way to work.