刚刚安装了LaunchBar，但我无法将其设置为 Option + Space 来“启动”，我无法处理它不使用它，我太使用聚焦 Command + Space 和 Ctrl + Space 适用于 VS 2008 :P
I didn't know Quicksilver wasn't being as actively supported. It does all I need it to do at the moment though.
Just installed LaunchBar but I can't set it to be Option + Space to "launch", I can't deal with it not using that, I'm too use to Spotlight on Command + Space and Ctrl + Space is for VS 2008 :P
Quicksilver is still alive and well. There are at least a couple of endeavours to keep it going, up to date and restructure and clean up the code base. Check out the code from Google Code.
As for launching apps, not even Spotlight comes close to how fast it is in Quicksilver.
Of course the real joy of Quicksilver is past just launching apps and using triggers, scripts and the many plugins. My workflow goes to a new level with Quicksilver. I'd be lost without it.
Update: Since posting this I switched and use LaunchBar for a while. This was during the time that QuickSilver seemed to be almost close to death. Loved LaunchBar and didn't need to switch back to QuickSilver. Recently though, I have left LaunchBar and have been using Alfred. I would highly recommend it. For me, LaunchBar and Alfred are pretty close. But, aesthetically and operationally, Alfred suits my tastes more than LaunchBar.
It still runs stably for me. I would be miserable without it.
And yeah, I would recommend switching if you only use it for an "app launcher", but launching apps is like white belt Quicksilver. I don't know of any program that lets you simply tell your computer what to do in such a simple way. And even Spotlight won't remember the keys you usually type to identify an object or action.
Ubiquity for Firefox is pretty good, but it's locked inside a browser...
当与 Parallels/VMWare Fusion 集成来启动 Windows 应用程序时，QuickSilver 也非常棒。 您无法像各种 OSX 插件那样进行深度集成，但它肯定有助于双操作系统的可用性。
I also gave up on QuickSilver for a while when Leopard came out. I tried Spotlight. I gave up on that and returned. QuickSilver is much faster, and it does so much more that I missed.
I have not noticed any instability (Leopard) running B54 (3815) - it looks like the open-source version is B56A3 though.
QuickSilver is awesome when integrated with Parallels/VMWare Fusion to launch Windows apps too. You don't get the deep integration as with the various OSX plugins, but it definitely helps the dual-OS usability.
我已经有一段时间没有使用 OS X 了，但我得到的印象是 Spotlight 从一开始就很大程度上否定了使用启动器的原因。 Quicksilver 有一些很酷的东西，比如内置的直接对象，但总的来说，它主要用于启动应用程序，而 Spotlight 现在可以同样快地做到这一点。
I haven't used OS X in a while, but the impression I get is that Spotlight has largely negated the reason for using a launcher in the first place. Quicksilver has some cool things like direct objects built in, but by and large it was mostly used for launching apps, and Spotlight can now do that just as fast.
I use quicksilver all day (on latest version of OSX); and no spotlight doesn't negate it... quicksilver is still much faster for launching applications.
I love QS and agree that it is so productive that I am willing to put up with its flaws. I usually have to launch it several times before it gets up and running, though. To fix that issue I created a little quicksilver launcher app.
After Quicksilver stopped being updated for a while, I migrated to LaunchBar. Quicksilver had some occasional crashes and could be very resource intensive. LaunchBar has largely the same functionality without these problems. It is not free though.
There are a couple branches out there that are active, I think I'm currently running B56 and loving it. I have too many scripts, triggers, objects that I rely on daily...I would be lost without it.
The one thing I do miss was using QS to quickly send attachments via email to people in my address book. Highlighting the file, activate QS, Current Selection tab Mail to.. tab Person's name was just awesome.
After the 10.5.5 update, I find Spotlight to solve 99% of the things I originally used Quicksilver for and the speed is nearly identical now. Spotlight is invaluable for finding information you may not remember where or when you last saw it. Unless a major rewrite of QS causes me to reevaluate it again, I suspect Spotlight will be all I need and use.
发布评论
评论（13）
不。它回来了，宝贝。
No. It's back, baby.
我不知道 Quicksilver 没有得到如此积极的支持。
不过，它已经完成了我目前需要它做的所有事情。
刚刚安装了LaunchBar，但我无法将其设置为 Option + Space 来“启动”，我无法处理它不使用它，我太使用聚焦 Command + Space 和 Ctrl + Space 适用于 VS 2008 :P
I didn't know Quicksilver wasn't being as actively supported.
It does all I need it to do at the moment though.
Just installed LaunchBar but I can't set it to be Option + Space to "launch", I can't deal with it not using that, I'm too use to Spotlight on Command + Space and Ctrl + Space is for VS 2008 :P
快银还活着，而且活得很好。 至少有一些努力来保持它的运行、更新、重组和清理代码库。 查看 Google 代码中的代码。
至于启动应用程序，即使是 Spotlight 也比不上 Quicksilver 的速度。
当然，Quicksilver 的真正乐趣不仅仅是启动应用程序和使用触发器、脚本和许多插件。 Quicksilver 使我的工作流程达到了一个新的水平。 没有它我就会迷路。
更新：自从发布此内容后，我切换并使用 LaunchBar 一段时间。 这是快银看起来快要死掉的时候了。 喜欢 LaunchBar，不需要切换回 QuickSilver。 不过最近，我离开了 LaunchBar，开始使用 Alfred。 我会极力推荐它。 对我来说，LaunchBar 和 Alfred 非常接近。 但是，从美观和操作上来说，Alfred 比 LaunchBar 更适合我的口味。
Quicksilver is still alive and well. There are at least a couple of endeavours to keep it going, up to date and restructure and clean up the code base. Check out the code from Google Code.
As for launching apps, not even Spotlight comes close to how fast it is in Quicksilver.
Of course the real joy of Quicksilver is past just launching apps and using triggers, scripts and the many plugins. My workflow goes to a new level with Quicksilver. I'd be lost without it.
Update: Since posting this I switched and use LaunchBar for a while. This was during the time that QuickSilver seemed to be almost close to death. Loved LaunchBar and didn't need to switch back to QuickSilver. Recently though, I have left LaunchBar and have been using Alfred. I would highly recommend it. For me, LaunchBar and Alfred are pretty close. But, aesthetically and operationally, Alfred suits my tastes more than LaunchBar.
对我来说它仍然运行稳定。 没有它我会很痛苦。
是的，如果您只将其用于“应用程序启动器”，我建议您切换，但启动应用程序就像白带 Quicksilver。 我不知道有哪个程序可以让您以如此简单的方式告诉计算机要做什么。 甚至 Spotlight 也不会记住您通常键入的用于识别对象或操作的按键。
Firefox 的普及性相当不错，但它被锁定在浏览器中......
It still runs stably for me. I would be miserable without it.
And yeah, I would recommend switching if you only use it for an "app launcher", but launching apps is like white belt Quicksilver. I don't know of any program that lets you simply tell your computer what to do in such a simple way. And even Spotlight won't remember the keys you usually type to identify an object or action.
Ubiquity for Firefox is pretty good, but it's locked inside a browser...
当 Leopard 出现时，我也一度放弃了 QuickSilver。 我尝试过聚光灯。 我放弃了，然后回来了。 QuickSilver 速度更快，而且它的功能比我错过的要多得多。
我没有注意到运行 B54（3815）有任何不稳定（Leopard）——不过看起来开源版本是 B56A3。
当与 Parallels/VMWare Fusion 集成来启动 Windows 应用程序时，QuickSilver 也非常棒。 您无法像各种 OSX 插件那样进行深度集成，但它肯定有助于双操作系统的可用性。
I also gave up on QuickSilver for a while when Leopard came out. I tried Spotlight. I gave up on that and returned. QuickSilver is much faster, and it does so much more that I missed.
I have not noticed any instability (Leopard) running B54 (3815) - it looks like the open-source version is B56A3 though.
QuickSilver is awesome when integrated with Parallels/VMWare Fusion to launch Windows apps too. You don't get the deep integration as with the various OSX plugins, but it definitely helps the dual-OS usability.
我已经有一段时间没有使用 OS X 了，但我得到的印象是 Spotlight 从一开始就很大程度上否定了使用启动器的原因。 Quicksilver 有一些很酷的东西，比如内置的直接对象，但总的来说，它主要用于启动应用程序，而 Spotlight 现在可以同样快地做到这一点。
I haven't used OS X in a while, but the impression I get is that Spotlight has largely negated the reason for using a launcher in the first place. Quicksilver has some cool things like direct objects built in, but by and large it was mostly used for launching apps, and Spotlight can now do that just as fast.
我整天使用 Quicksilver（在最新版本的 OSX 上）； 任何聚光灯都不能否定它...quicksilver 启动应用程序的速度仍然快得多。
I use quicksilver all day (on latest version of OSX); and no spotlight doesn't negate it... quicksilver is still much faster for launching applications.
我喜欢 QS，并且同意它非常高效，因此我愿意忍受它的缺陷。 不过，在它启动并运行之前，我通常必须启动它几次。 为了解决这个问题，我创建了一个quicksilver启动器应用程序< /a>.
I love QS and agree that it is so productive that I am willing to put up with its flaws. I usually have to launch it several times before it gets up and running, though. To fix that issue I created a little quicksilver launcher app.
Quicksilver 停止更新一段时间后，我迁移到 LaunchBar。 Quicksilver 偶尔会发生一些崩溃，并且可能会占用大量资源。 LaunchBar 具有大致相同的功能，但没有这些问题。 但它不是免费的。
After Quicksilver stopped being updated for a while, I migrated to LaunchBar. Quicksilver had some occasional crashes and could be very resource intensive. LaunchBar has largely the same functionality without these problems. It is not free though.
QuickSilver 还活着，而且活得很好。
您可以在 http://qsapp.com/
找到所有活动的中心网站
GitHub（用于源代码和问题跟踪）位于 https://github.com/quicksilver/Quicksilver
最新版本 B58 (3841) 在 Snow Leopard (10.6.6) 上相当稳定。
QuickSilver is still alive, and well.
You can find the hub-website for all activities at http://qsapp.com/
GitHub (used for source code and issues tracking) is at https://github.com/quicksilver/Quicksilver
The latest version, B58 (3841) is quite stable on Snow Leopard (10.6.6).
有几个分支是活跃的，我想我目前正在运行 B56 并且喜欢它。 我有太多每天依赖的脚本、触发器、对象……没有它们我会迷失方向。
There are a couple branches out there that are active, I think I'm currently running B56 and loving it. I have too many scripts, triggers, objects that I rely on daily...I would be lost without it.
现在已经201了，而且仍然强劲！
It's 201 and it's still running strong!
我确实怀念的一件事是使用 QS 通过电子邮件快速将附件发送给我地址簿中的人。 突出显示该文件，激活 QS，当前选择选项卡 邮件到.. 选项卡 人名非常棒。
10.5.5 更新后，我发现 Spotlight 可以解决我最初使用 Quicksilver 解决的 99% 的问题，而且现在速度几乎相同。 Spotlight 对于查找您可能不记得上次在何处或何时看到的信息非常有用。 除非 QS 的重大重写导致我再次重新评估它，否则我怀疑 Spotlight 将是我所需要和使用的全部。
The one thing I do miss was using QS to quickly send attachments via email to people in my address book. Highlighting the file, activate QS, Current Selection tab Mail to.. tab Person's name was just awesome.
After the 10.5.5 update, I find Spotlight to solve 99% of the things I originally used Quicksilver for and the speed is nearly identical now. Spotlight is invaluable for finding information you may not remember where or when you last saw it. Unless a major rewrite of QS causes me to reevaluate it again, I suspect Spotlight will be all I need and use.