尝试针对 Web 服务器进行 XpoLog 日志分析，它提供日志分析平台来分析多个 Web 和应用程序服务器以进行集中定位，并创建自动报告和应用程序运行状况监控。 可以在XpoLog日志分析找到它
Try out XpoLog log analysis for web servers it provide log analysis platform to anlyze multiple web and application servers for centrelized location and create automatic reports and monitors for applications health. find it at XpoLog log analysis
I typically do a search every 30 or so days for new projects for better stats. I currently (still) use AWStats (and JAWStats as I mentioned in another thread).
One of the best things about AWStats when compared to it counterparts is ability to break up your datafiles to create reports by day, week, month, year or even hour using the databasebreak feature.
Why people are still using Webalizer and Analog (well, speed aside) is beyond me. At least in my experience they tend to bury as much information as they expose and I end up reading raw logs.
My old company always used WebLog Expert. There is a free 'lite' version. Its still has on-going development and can be combined with geo-location databases if you use one of the paid versions.
如果您正在寻找旨在提供给客户的统计信息并向他们提供真实的数据（而不是基于每个文件的点击次数），那么请查看 Google Analytics。 免费而且看起来很漂亮。
If you are looking for stats that are meant to be given to a customer and provide them with realistic data (not number of hits based on every file), then check out Google Analytics. Free and looks pretty.
AWStats and Webalizer are both good and free (I think both free speech as well as free beer). I generally prefer the look of AWStats - it has a nice modern look whereas Webalizer looks like something created in about 1992.
They both give roughly the same information which includes:
Most frequently accessed pages
Which hosts (IPs and Domain Names) visitors come from
Proportion of users using different browsers
Proportion of downloads of different file types
All of this information is usually viewable on a hour by hour, day by day, month by month and year by year basis. Normally the raw data is available but also with bar charts and pie charts. Both AWStats and Webalizer will (I think) try and work out where your visitors come from by using services such as GeoIP, although I never bothered to set this up. Some also try to work out what order people have visited pages in and things like that - but that is very difficult to do so the results are guesses at the best.
I generally find them both useful - even if just to get an overview of what is going on with my server and who is accessing it. They are both relatively easy to install - although I seem to remember Webalizer being a little easier than AWStats, and they both have varied configuration options to let you decide exactly what you want to get out of them.
我使用 Analog 因为它是免费的，但它现在已经过时了（哇，上次发布是 4 年前！）而且我'我确信它没有新产品那么多的奇特功能。
I use Analog because it's free, but it is rather dated now (wow, last release was 4 years ago!) and I'm sure it doesn't have as many fancy features as newer ones.
Splunk > is great, and free. It allows you to visualize and search all of your logs in real time. And it's all web based, so you can view your logs from just about anywhere.
I'd go for awstats. I was getting my site usage reports from awstats for a while and then turned on Google Analytics to do this job as well. And, surprisingly, Google turned out to be rather unreliable.
I get usually have no visits from a country like Finland and once I knew for sure a friend of mine visited the site from Finland and what happend? Awstats says - hey, you had a visit from Finland! And Google Analytics? I move my mouse over Finland and the bubble says "visits: 0". After that I could never quite make myself trust it again.
It seems that as javascript page-tagging becomes the more popular choice as a way of processing web stats, there's not as much work being done on log-based analysis tools anymore in the marketplace. My office used to use a product called LiveStats.XSP. It wasn't the greatest tool by any means, but it did have some nice features. It was recently bought by Microsoft and is no longer supported however. It abandoned log analysis turned into a proposed Google Analytics killer called Microsoft Gatineau, which supposedly is good at determining the demographics of your visitors, including age and gender (yeah sure...)
When I was looking for log analysis software a while ago, I wanted to avoid anything that looked overly bloated and enterprisey, which is what most stuff seemed to be, focusing more on the marketing and advertising aspects of reports.
One thing you may want to look at is the new version of Urchin, Urchin6 (see features here). Urchin I believe was bought by Google a few years ago. It's offered as a locally installed solution, and with it you have the option to use either page-tagging or log file analysis for any site that it monitors. There also seems to be some interface ties between Google's own web-based Google Analytics and Urchin. It's not free though, unfortunately, and I think you can only get it through authorized partners.
It does all the standard logfile analysis stuff, everything is browser-based, the reports it offers are pretty deep and comprehensive, and it also seems to have a few bells and whistles that other services don't offer. For example, I remember it being able to present a view of a web page it tracks with colored hot spots overlayed on top of it, based on how often users click on items on that area of the page. Worth checking out the demo of it anyways.
I get Awstats and Webalizer with my web hosting account and I find that neither is accurate or very useful. The reported numbers are inflated by up to 1000%, because the tools don't properly identify bots and spiders. Here is a comparison of the Visits metric between three tools over the past 3 weeks (I think Awstats has only partial data for 3/23, and no data for today 3/24, which is why I did not include the numbers).
Google Woopra Awstats
Sunday, March 1, 2009 10 11 69
Monday, March 2, 2009 13 14 85
Tuesday, March 3, 2009 13 14 96
Wednesday, March 4, 2009 21 28 91
Thursday, March 5, 2009 19 25 107
Friday, March 6, 2009 12 10 88
Saturday, March 7, 2009 12 14 100
Sunday, March 8, 2009 10 11 65
Monday, March 9, 2009 13 14 78
Tuesday, March 10, 2009 17 13 96
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 18 16 87
Thursday, March 12, 2009 19 18 87
Friday, March 13, 2009 12 13 66
Saturday, March 14, 2009 11 7 52
Sunday, March 15, 2009 11 12 57
Monday, March 16, 2009 13 15 92
Tuesday, March 17, 2009 24 22 102
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 18 16 79
Thursday, March 19, 2009 17 18 73
Friday, March 20, 2009 16 11 70
Saturday, March 21, 2009 24 26 67
Sunday, March 22, 2009 103 114 216
Monday, March 23, 2009 232 223 117
I personally prefer Woopra over Google. While it is still in Beta, it can take a long time for your site to get approved, and it will probably be a paid service at some point, the real-time monitoring capabilities are amazing. The new custom reporting capabilities on Google Analytics are superior to Woopra, though. Woopra does not have any capabilties to produce printed reports
发布评论
评论（10）
尝试针对 Web 服务器进行 XpoLog 日志分析，它提供日志分析平台来分析多个 Web 和应用程序服务器以进行集中定位，并创建自动报告和应用程序运行状况监控。 可以在XpoLog日志分析找到它
Try out XpoLog log analysis for web servers it provide log analysis platform to anlyze multiple web and application servers for centrelized location and create automatic reports and monitors for applications health. find it at XpoLog log analysis
我通常每 30 天左右就会搜索一次新项目以获得更好的统计数据。 我目前（仍然）使用 AWStats（以及我在另一个线程中提到的 JAWStats）。
与同类产品相比，AWStats 的最大优点之一是能够使用 数据库中断 功能。
为什么人们仍在使用 Webalizer 和 Analog（好吧，抛开速度不谈）我无法理解。 至少根据我的经验，他们倾向于隐藏与暴露的信息一样多的信息，而我最终会阅读原始日志。
I typically do a search every 30 or so days for new projects for better stats. I currently (still) use AWStats (and JAWStats as I mentioned in another thread).
One of the best things about AWStats when compared to it counterparts is ability to break up your datafiles to create reports by day, week, month, year or even hour using the databasebreak feature.
Why people are still using Webalizer and Analog (well, speed aside) is beyond me. At least in my experience they tend to bury as much information as they expose and I end up reading raw logs.
我以前的公司一直使用WebLog Expert。 有一个免费的“精简”版本。 它仍在不断开发中，如果您使用付费版本之一，则可以与地理位置数据库结合使用。
My old company always used WebLog Expert. There is a free 'lite' version. Its still has on-going development and can be combined with geo-location databases if you use one of the paid versions.
如果您正在寻找旨在提供给客户的统计信息并向他们提供真实的数据（而不是基于每个文件的点击次数），那么请查看 Google Analytics。 免费而且看起来很漂亮。
If you are looking for stats that are meant to be given to a customer and provide them with realistic data (not number of hits based on every file), then check out Google Analytics. Free and looks pretty.
AWStats 和 Webalizer 都很好而且免费（我认为言论自由和免费啤酒一样）。 我通常更喜欢 AWStats 的外观 - 它具有漂亮的现代外观，而 Webalizer 看起来像是 1992 年左右创建的东西。
它们都提供大致相同的信息，其中包括：
所有这些信息通常可以按小时、按天、按月、按年查看。 通常可以使用原始数据，但也可以使用条形图和饼图。 AWStats 和 Webalizer 都会（我认为）尝试使用 GeoIP 等服务来确定访问者来自哪里，尽管我从来没有费心去设置它。 有些人还尝试计算出人们访问页面的顺序以及类似的事情 - 但这非常困难，因此结果最多只是猜测。
我通常发现它们都很有用 - 即使只是为了了解我的服务器正在发生什么以及谁正在访问它。 它们都相对容易安装 - 尽管我似乎记得 Webalizer 比 AWStats 更容易一些，而且它们都有不同的配置选项，让您可以准确地决定您想要从中获得什么。
有关更多信息，请参阅他们的网站 awstats.sourceforge.net/ 和 http://www.webalizer.org/。
希望有帮助。
罗宾
AWStats and Webalizer are both good and free (I think both free speech as well as free beer). I generally prefer the look of AWStats - it has a nice modern look whereas Webalizer looks like something created in about 1992.
They both give roughly the same information which includes:
All of this information is usually viewable on a hour by hour, day by day, month by month and year by year basis. Normally the raw data is available but also with bar charts and pie charts. Both AWStats and Webalizer will (I think) try and work out where your visitors come from by using services such as GeoIP, although I never bothered to set this up. Some also try to work out what order people have visited pages in and things like that - but that is very difficult to do so the results are guesses at the best.
I generally find them both useful - even if just to get an overview of what is going on with my server and who is accessing it. They are both relatively easy to install - although I seem to remember Webalizer being a little easier than AWStats, and they both have varied configuration options to let you decide exactly what you want to get out of them.
For more information see their sites at awstats.sourceforge.net/ and http://www.webalizer.org/.
Hope that helps.
Robin
我使用 Analog 因为它是免费的，但它现在已经过时了（哇，上次发布是 4 年前！）而且我'我确信它没有新产品那么多的奇特功能。
I use Analog because it's free, but it is rather dated now (wow, last release was 4 years ago!) and I'm sure it doesn't have as many fancy features as newer ones.
Splunk > 很棒，而且免费。 它允许您实时可视化和搜索所有日志。 而且它全部基于网络，因此您几乎可以从任何地方查看日志。
Splunk > is great, and free. It allows you to visualize and search all of your logs in real time. And it's all web based, so you can view your logs from just about anywhere.
我会去awstats。 我从 awstats 获取网站使用报告有一段时间了，然后也使用 Google Analytics 来完成这项工作。 令人惊讶的是，谷歌被证明相当不可靠。
我通常没有来自芬兰这样的国家的访问，一旦我确定我的一个朋友从芬兰访问了该网站，发生了什么？ Awstats 说 - 嘿，您来自芬兰！ 还有谷歌分析？ 我将鼠标移到芬兰上，气泡显示“访问次数：0”。 从那以后，我再也无法让自己完全相信它了。
I'd go for awstats. I was getting my site usage reports from awstats for a while and then turned on Google Analytics to do this job as well. And, surprisingly, Google turned out to be rather unreliable.
I get usually have no visits from a country like Finland and once I knew for sure a friend of mine visited the site from Finland and what happend? Awstats says - hey, you had a visit from Finland! And Google Analytics? I move my mouse over Finland and the bubble says "visits: 0". After that I could never quite make myself trust it again.
似乎随着 JavaScript 页面标记作为处理 Web 统计数据的一种更流行的选择，市场上已经没有那么多关于基于日志的分析工具的工作了。 我的办公室曾经使用一种名为 LiveStats.XSP 的产品。 无论如何，它都不是最好的工具，但它确实有一些不错的功能。 它最近被微软收购，但不再受支持。 它放弃了日志分析，变成了一个名为 Microsoft 的 Google Analytics 杀手。 Gatineau，据说它擅长确定访问者的人口统计数据，包括年龄和性别（是的......）
当我不久前在寻找日志分析软件时，我想避免任何看起来过于臃肿的东西进取心，这就是大多数东西似乎的样子，更多地关注报告的营销和广告方面。
您可能想要查看的一件事是新版本的 Urchin，Urchin6 (在此处查看功能）。 我相信 Urchin 几年前就被谷歌收购了。 它作为本地安装的解决方案提供，通过它，您可以选择对其监控的任何站点使用页面标记或日志文件分析。 Google 自己的基于网络的 Google Analytics 和 Urchin 之间似乎也存在一些接口联系。 不幸的是，它不是免费的，我认为你只能通过授权合作伙伴获得它。
它执行所有标准日志文件分析工作，一切都是基于浏览器的，它提供的报告非常深入和全面，而且它似乎还具有其他服务不提供的一些花哨功能。 例如，我记得它能够根据用户单击页面该区域上的项目的频率来呈现其跟踪的网页视图，并在其顶部覆盖彩色热点。 无论如何，值得一看它的演示。
It seems that as javascript page-tagging becomes the more popular choice as a way of processing web stats, there's not as much work being done on log-based analysis tools anymore in the marketplace. My office used to use a product called LiveStats.XSP. It wasn't the greatest tool by any means, but it did have some nice features. It was recently bought by Microsoft and is no longer supported however. It abandoned log analysis turned into a proposed Google Analytics killer called Microsoft Gatineau, which supposedly is good at determining the demographics of your visitors, including age and gender (yeah sure...)
When I was looking for log analysis software a while ago, I wanted to avoid anything that looked overly bloated and enterprisey, which is what most stuff seemed to be, focusing more on the marketing and advertising aspects of reports.
One thing you may want to look at is the new version of Urchin, Urchin6 (see features here). Urchin I believe was bought by Google a few years ago. It's offered as a locally installed solution, and with it you have the option to use either page-tagging or log file analysis for any site that it monitors. There also seems to be some interface ties between Google's own web-based Google Analytics and Urchin. It's not free though, unfortunately, and I think you can only get it through authorized partners.
It does all the standard logfile analysis stuff, everything is browser-based, the reports it offers are pretty deep and comprehensive, and it also seems to have a few bells and whistles that other services don't offer. For example, I remember it being able to present a view of a web page it tracks with colored hot spots overlayed on top of it, based on how often users click on items on that area of the page. Worth checking out the demo of it anyways.
我通过我的网络托管帐户获取 Awstats 和 Webalizer，但发现两者都不准确或非常有用。 报告的数字被夸大了 1000%，因为这些工具无法正确识别机器人和蜘蛛。 这是过去 3 周内三种工具的访问量指标的比较（我认为 Awstats 只有 3/23 的部分数据，并且没有今天 3/24 的数据，这就是为什么我没有包含这些数字）。
我个人更喜欢 Woopra 而不是 Google。 虽然它仍处于测试阶段，但您的网站可能需要很长时间才能获得批准，并且在某个时候它可能会成为付费服务，实时监控功能令人惊叹。 不过，Google Analytics 上的新自定义报告功能优于 Woopra。 Woopra 没有能力生成打印报告
I get Awstats and Webalizer with my web hosting account and I find that neither is accurate or very useful. The reported numbers are inflated by up to 1000%, because the tools don't properly identify bots and spiders. Here is a comparison of the Visits metric between three tools over the past 3 weeks (I think Awstats has only partial data for 3/23, and no data for today 3/24, which is why I did not include the numbers).
I personally prefer Woopra over Google. While it is still in Beta, it can take a long time for your site to get approved, and it will probably be a paid service at some point, the real-time monitoring capabilities are amazing. The new custom reporting capabilities on Google Analytics are superior to Woopra, though. Woopra does not have any capabilties to produce printed reports