您使用什么作为团队系统的良好替代方案?

发布于 2024-07-04 05:17:41 字数 124 浏览 13 评论 0原文

我想了解其他人采用了哪些解决方案来获得团队系统功能。 我们都知道团队系统对于我们中的一些人来说可能很昂贵。 我知道他们提供了一个小型团队版本,包含五个许可证和 MSDN 订阅,但是如果您的团队超过五个或者您不想使用团队系统怎么办?

I would like to gauge what solutions other people put in place to get Team System functionality. We all know that Team System can be pricey for some of us. I know they offer a small team edition with five licenses with a MSDN subscription, but what if your team is bigger than five or you don't want to use Team System?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(12

乜一 2024-07-11 05:17:41

我很惊讶没有人提到免费并且优秀的TeamCity 来自 JetBrains 的产品。 它包括:

  • 持续集成
  • 软件构建管理
  • 项目管理、监控和统计报告
  • 与许多 IDE、源代码控制系统和测试框架的集成

对于项目管理/错误跟踪/Git 或 Subversion 存储库,我还使用 Unfuddle(小型个人项目免费!)

I'm stunned that nobody has mentioned the free and excellent TeamCity product from JetBrains. It includes:

  • Continous Integration
  • Software Build management
  • Project Management, Monitoring and Statistical Reports
  • Integration with many IDEs, Sourcecode control systems, and Testing Frameworks

For project management / bug tracking / Git or Subversion repository I also use Unfuddle (free for small personal projects!)

蓝咒 2024-07-11 05:17:41

我会选择 Trac + Subversion。 虽然没有什么是完美的,但这个组合对我来说效果很好,而且价格也合适。

即使对于我独自完成的项目,将这两者集成起来也是很好的。

I'll second Trac + Subversion. While nothing is perfect, this combination works quite well for me, and the price is right.

Even for projects I work solo on, it's nice to have both of these integrated.

酒几许 2024-07-11 05:17:41

通过 SourceGearVault 和 FogBugz 之间的良好集成,我取得了很大的成功。

用于构建自动化的 MS Build 满足了我的需求。

I've had a lot of success with the nice integration between SourceGear vault and FogBugz.

MS Build for build automation meets my needs.

缱倦旧时光 2024-07-11 05:17:41

从问题中取出我的答案并将其发布为 StackOverflow 常见问题解答的答案之一。

这是我使用的解决方案,效果很好:

Took my answer out of the question and posted it as one of the answers per the StackOverflow FAQ.

Here is the solution that I use and it works great:

简单 2024-07-11 05:17:41

Trac

它似乎是针对开源/社区类型的项目,但它只是作为内部开发人员内联网工作。 它将 Wiki、Bug 跟踪器和 SVN 源代码浏览器集成到一个漂亮的包中,并且非常容易配置。

Trac

It seems targeted for Open Source / Community type projects but it's working just find as an internal Developer intranet. It integrates a Wiki, Bug tracker and SVN Source browser into one nice package and it's very easy to configure.

遮云壑 2024-07-11 05:17:41

Sourcegear 的产品套件是一个非常好的选择。 Vault + Dragnet + Fortress 很不错,但是如果你买不起所有这些,Vault + FogBugz 是一个相当不错的选择。

Sourcegear's suite of products are a very nice alternative. Vault + Dragnet + Fortress are nice, however if you can't afford all of those, Vault + FogBugz is a pretty decent alternative.

深爱成瘾 2024-07-11 05:17:41

我在家用计算机上使用 SourceGear 的 Fortress 进行个人开发。 它对单个用户免费。

I use SourceGear's Fortress on my home computer for personal development. Its free for a single user.

花期渐远 2024-07-11 05:17:41

我使用 VisualSVN Server 进行源代码控制,Mingle 用于项目管理和错误跟踪,以及 Team City 用于持续集成。 我还在适应它,但到目前为止效果很好。 对于小型团队来说,这是一个很好的免费设置。 对于较大的团队来说,获得 Mingle 和 Team City 的许可需要花费金钱。

I use VisualSVN Server for source control, Mingle for project management and bug tracking, and Team City for continous integration. I'm still getting used to it, but it's working great so far. This is a good free setup for small teams. Licensing Mingle and Team City will cost money for larger teams.

倾城花音 2024-07-11 05:17:41

Seapine CM - 跨平台问题管理和版本控制

http://www.seapine.com

Seapine CM - Cross platform issue management and version control

http://www.seapine.com

凡间太子 2024-07-11 05:17:41

对于轻量级和 完全免费的选项,您可以使用与 Basecamp(+ SVN 客户端)集成的 Springloops。

注意:SpringLoops 与Basecamp 不提供免费设置。

For a lightweight & completely free option, you can use Springloops integrated with Basecamp (+ an SVN client).

Note: SpringLoops integration with Basecamp is not available in their free setup.

扎心 2024-07-11 05:17:41

我也在 Linux 上进行开发,这是我提出解决方案的原因之一。 我想知道 SourceGear 选项在这方面是如何工作的? 我以前使用过 Vault,根据我的经验,这并不算太糟糕,但我知道它主要是基于 Windows 的。 我想我曾经读到过他们有一个可以在 Linux 上运行的客户端,但我从未使用过它。 我只是想进一步展开对话,这样提出这个问题的人就可以根据自己的需求找到最好的答案。

如果 Vault 客户端可以在 Linux 和 Mac 上运行并且运行良好,那么使用 Vault 和 Fortress 肯定会成为公认的答案,作为 Team System 的良好低成本替代方案。

I develop on Linux also, which is one reason I came up with the solution I have. I was wondering how the SourceGear options work in this respect? I have used Vault before, which in my experience wasn't too bad, but I know it is mostly Windows based. I think I read at one point that they have a client that can work on Linux, but I have never used it. I just want to open the conversation up a little more, so people who come to this question can hopefully find the best answer for them, based on their wants.

If the Vault client can run on Linux and Mac and run well, then using Vault and Fortress will definitely be the accepted answer as a good low cost alternative to Team System.

烂柯人 2024-07-11 05:17:41

带有 TortoiseSVN 附加组件的 SVN 提供了一个可靠且易于使用的界面。 WinMerge 也是一个很好的混合工具。

SVN with the TortoiseSVN add-on makes for a solid and easy to use interface. WinMerge is a great tool to thrown in that mix as well.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文