返回介绍

A Quick Comparison of Popular Programs

发布于 2024-10-11 20:33:53 字数 2363 浏览 0 评论 0 收藏 0

After you’ve identified a few programs that you are interested in, you could list the properties of each one to compare them. In Table 1-1 , let’s compare a few of the popular programs introduced in this chapter.

在确定了感兴趣的几个计划后,您可以列出每个计划的属性进行比较。在表 1-1 中,让我们比较本章介绍的几个热门计划。

Table 1-1 : A Comparison of Three Bug Bounty Programs: HackerOne, Facebook, and GitHub

表格 1-1:三个漏洞赏金计划的比较:HackerOne、Facebook 和 GitHub。

ProgramAsset typeIn scopePayout amountResponse time
HackerOneSocial sitehttps://hackerone.com/
https://api.hackerone.com
*.vpn.hackerone.net
https://www.hackerone.com
And more assets . . .
Any vulnerability except exclusions are in scope.
$500–$15,000+Fast. Average time to response is 5 hours. Average time to triage is 15 hours.
FacebookSocial site, nonsocial site, mobile site, IoT, and source codeInstagram
Internet.org / Free Basics
Oculus
Workplace
Open source projects by Facebook
WhatsApp
Portal
FBLite
Express Wi-Fi
Any vulnerability except exclusions are in scope.
$500 minimumBased on my experience, pretty fast!
GitHubSocial sitehttps://blog.github.com/
https://community.github.com/
http://resources.github.com/
And more assets . . .
Use of known-vulnerable software.
Clickjacking a static site.
Including HTML in Markdown content.
Leaking email addresses via .patch links.
And more issues . . .
$617–$30,000Fast. Average time to response is 11 hours. Average time to triage is 23 hours.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。
列表为空,暂无数据
    我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
    原文